| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#52
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous. This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest. As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his degrees, but I do enjoy some of your leaps. He has been far more successful than you. By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla, who died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which I doubt. Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more successful, there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire Hitler? You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a terrorist against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to Harry. Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian. Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny nonetheless. The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco? Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian. Neither wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by submitting. "Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term. So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White, Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh? The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the "taboo" words and phrases change monthly. What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American", "African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right. None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward. People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better. Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences. Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do with Mr. Duck's current problems. It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel. Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some goofy reality show actor says. The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok. If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows, but it isn't up to me. And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage? Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do you think of? I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here before the white man arrived and destroyed them. Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived? I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians," unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage. What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians." I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads. I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday. And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian. |
|
#53
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
On 12/21/13, 3:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous. This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest. As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his degrees, but I do enjoy some of your leaps. He has been far more successful than you. By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla, who died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which I doubt. Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more successful, there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire Hitler? You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a terrorist against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to Harry. Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian. Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny nonetheless. The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco? Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian. Neither wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by submitting. "Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term. So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White, Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh? The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the "taboo" words and phrases change monthly. What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American", "African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right. None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward. People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better. Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences. Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do with Mr. Duck's current problems. It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel. Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some goofy reality show actor says. The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok. If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows, but it isn't up to me. And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage? Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do you think of? I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here before the white man arrived and destroyed them. Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived? I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians," unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage. What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians." I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads. I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday. And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian. So, some of your best friends are Indians, eh? I have a few friends from India. None of them have bindi marks. So, in your mind, they would be "dotless Indians"? Life must be very confusing for you righties, eh? -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
|
#54
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
In article , says...
On 12/21/13, 10:41 AM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:28:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/21/13, 12:45 AM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:44:36 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok. You have no problem saying hateful things about anyone with religious beliefs and you can't stand anyone expressing those beliefs in public places. That also seems to be a common thread through the "liberal" community. If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows, but it isn't up to me. Nor is it up to you to decide what these people say when answering a direct question, designed to get this guy to say what he did. I was amused watching the lefties try to explain why Alex Baldwin calling a guy he was mad at a "****ing faggot" was OK and this was bad. The excuse basically came down to "he is one of us" (a flaming liberal). Baldwin lost his show. Huh? What show? 30 Rock was leaving before that comment. Baldwin had a show on MSNBC and lost it after about two weeks or so...after making his idiotic comments. Who knew he had a show on MSNBC? He must not have had much of a audience. I'm sorry Bashir lost his show...his comments about Snowbilly Sarah were on the mark. Therein lies your biggest problem. |
|
#55
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
In article , says...
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:17:39 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:20:11 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: "Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term. You obviously don't know anything about the ancient peoples, medieval history, or 19th and 20th Century history of that part of the Middle East. There were at least two times when Partition, or the creation of two separate nations, was offered to the self-described Palestinians...about 100 years ago and right after World War II. They turned it down both times and in 1948, the Arab nations initiated a war against Israel. The Israelis fought back and the Arabs lost. The question is how many of those "Israelis" lived in Palestine five years before that war? Virtually none of them. They were in Europe. It certainly sounds like an invasion and subjugation of the native population by europeans to me. Just another crusade. The reality is that nobody gave a **** about brown people in those days and they just ignored it. After the fall of the Ottomans in WWI and the withdrawal of the British after WWII, they thought nobody actually owned the land, at least nobody who could fight back. Conquest and subgation is a constant occurence during the history of man. Why is it any worse now than it was 200, 400, 1000, 2000 or 4000 years ago? Within the last 100 years the borders of many countries have been changed, many numerous times. Just take a look at the European continent 100 years ago vs. today. With one glaring exception WWII was the end of conquests. The European powers gave up their colonies and in the intervening years the last vestiges of European (and American) control of their conquests went away. For the US that would include Okinawa, the Philippines, Panama and some say Miami. You are deluded if your believe that WWII was the end of conquests. |
|
#56
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
On 12/21/2013 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 05:27:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/21/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:05:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla, who died in abject poverty By just about any standard Paris Hilton is more successful. Tesla may have been pretty smart but virtually everything he tried to do, failed. Financially, yes ... technically the guy was beyond genius ... which is likely why he failed financially. He literally knew just enough to be dangerous. One of the schemes that drove him into bankruptcy was trying to "beam" usable electrical power into homes with a megawatt transmitter and an antenna on your roof. Modern day experiments have proved his concept to be viable and technically achievable. He was a space shot, no question, but without him we'd have waited much longer for induction motors and the distribution of AC power. If Edison had his way, we'd be working off a horrible DC distribution system. |
|
#57
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
On 12/21/13, 4:02 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/21/2013 10:36 AM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 05:27:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/21/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:05:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla, who died in abject poverty By just about any standard Paris Hilton is more successful. Tesla may have been pretty smart but virtually everything he tried to do, failed. Financially, yes ... technically the guy was beyond genius ... which is likely why he failed financially. He literally knew just enough to be dangerous. One of the schemes that drove him into bankruptcy was trying to "beam" usable electrical power into homes with a megawatt transmitter and an antenna on your roof. Modern day experiments have proved his concept to be viable and technically achievable. He was a space shot, no question, but without him we'd have waited much longer for induction motors and the distribution of AC power. If Edison had his way, we'd be working off a horrible DC distribution system. Gregg admires Paris Hilton more because she made a lot more money than Tesla. Paris Hilton also makes a lot more money than Jonas Salk ever did, and assuredly more than Albert Einstein ever made. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
|
#58
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 3:07 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous. This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest. As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his degrees, but I do enjoy some of your leaps. He has been far more successful than you. By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla, who died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which I doubt. Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more successful, there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire Hitler? You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a terrorist against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to Harry. Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian. Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny nonetheless. The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco? Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian. Neither wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by submitting. "Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term. So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White, Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh? The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the "taboo" words and phrases change monthly. What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American", "African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right. None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward. People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better. Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences. Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do with Mr. Duck's current problems. It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel. Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some goofy reality show actor says. The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok. If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows, but it isn't up to me. And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage? Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do you think of? I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here before the white man arrived and destroyed them. Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived? I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians," unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage. What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians." I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads. I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday. And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian. So, some of your best friends are Indians, eh? I have a few friends from India. None of them have bindi marks. So, in your mind, they would be "dotless Indians"? Life must be very confusing for you righties, eh? They only wear Bindi for special occasions. |
|
#59
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
On 12/21/13, 5:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/21/13, 3:07 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous. This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest. As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his degrees, but I do enjoy some of your leaps. He has been far more successful than you. By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla, who died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which I doubt. Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more successful, there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire Hitler? You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a terrorist against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to Harry. Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian. Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny nonetheless. The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco? Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian. Neither wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by submitting. "Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term. So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White, Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh? The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the "taboo" words and phrases change monthly. What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American", "African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right. None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward. People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better. Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences. Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do with Mr. Duck's current problems. It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel. Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some goofy reality show actor says. The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok. If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows, but it isn't up to me. And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage? Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do you think of? I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here before the white man arrived and destroyed them. Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived? I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians," unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage. What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians." I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads. I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday. And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian. So, some of your best friends are Indians, eh? I have a few friends from India. None of them have bindi marks. So, in your mind, they would be "dotless Indians"? Life must be very confusing for you righties, eh? They only wear Bindi for special occasions. "They," your friends, or people from India generally, because if you think the latter, you are wrong. Many people from India don't bother with it, period. My first friend from India was a reporter who was hired by the KC Star about the same time I was. He never wore a bindi. My wife had a colleague from India. She never wears a bindi, either. There are many "dotfree" people from India. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
|
#60
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 5:08 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/21/13, 3:07 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous. This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest. As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his degrees, but I do enjoy some of your leaps. He has been far more successful than you. By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla, who died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which I doubt. Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more successful, there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire Hitler? You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a terrorist against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to Harry. Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian. Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny nonetheless. The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco? Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian. Neither wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by submitting. "Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term. So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White, Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh? The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the "taboo" words and phrases change monthly. What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American", "African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right. None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward. People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better. Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences. Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do with Mr. Duck's current problems. It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel. Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some goofy reality show actor says. The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok. If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows, but it isn't up to me. And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage? Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do you think of? I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here before the white man arrived and destroyed them. Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived? I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians," unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage. What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians." I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads. I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday. And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian. So, some of your best friends are Indians, eh? I have a few friends from India. None of them have bindi marks. So, in your mind, they would be "dotless Indians"? Life must be very confusing for you righties, eh? They only wear Bindi for special occasions. "They," your friends, or people from India generally, because if you think the latter, you are wrong. Many people from India don't bother with it, period. My first friend from India was a reporter who was hired by the KC Star about the same time I was. He never wore a bindi. My wife had a colleague from India. She never wears a bindi, either. There are many "dotfree" people from India. Most of the dot Indians in this area! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Scalia drops bombshell... | General | |||
| OT Duck, duck....goosed! | General | |||
| Ot Curling dynasty over? | General | |||
| If it walks like a liberal duck and spends like a liberal duck | ASA | |||
| AUTHOR KITTY KELLEY PREPARES 'COUP DE GRACE' FOR GEORGE BUSH DYNASTY | General | |||
Linear Mode
