BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/159645-scalia-supports-duck-dynasty-star.html)

F.O.A.D. December 21st 13 06:02 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
On 12/21/13, 12:45 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:18:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 12/21/13, 10:46 AM,
wrote:

By your $tandard$ Paris Hilton is more successful, because your
$tandard$ only involve $$$.


What is the Harry standard of excellence?

Vincent Van Gogh



As I said, *you* judge $ucce$$ only by money. Mozart, arguably the
greatest composer of all time, never made very much money, and, of
course, neither did van Gogh. Both Mozart and van Gogh died in their
prime. Paris Hilton is an overexposed talentless slut but, of course,
she has lotsa buck$, so, to you, she's a success.


Perhaps you did not have a dictionary at that college you went to.

Webster says
success
favorable or desired outcome; also : the attainment of wealth, favor,
or eminence.

I have a degree of respect for Paris Hilton because she is making her
own money, when it would be just as easy to just live off of hotel
money for the rest of her life. (like the Kennedy, Rockefeller and
Heinz heirs)


My point was that to you, the only success that qualifies as success is
financial success. That's really sad.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

Califbill December 21st 13 08:07 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous.

This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest.

As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his
degrees,
but I do enjoy some of your leaps.

He has been far more successful than you.


By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola
Tesla, who
died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist
homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which
I doubt.

Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to
slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more
successful,
there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly
neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire
Hitler?




You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a
terrorist
against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to
Harry.
Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian.


Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny
nonetheless.

The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco?




Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian.
Neither
wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by
submitting.



"Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term.


So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White,
Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native
Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh?

The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed
with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe
around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the
"taboo" words and phrases change monthly.

What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American",
"African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right.
None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there
are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not
originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward.

People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as
being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better.



Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show
says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he
wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences.

Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do
with Mr. Duck's current problems.


It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the
roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel.

Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies
violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more
concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some
goofy reality show actor says.




The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says
hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok.

If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows,
but it isn't up to me.


And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence
against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage?
Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must
follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N
word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do
you think of?



I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here
before the white man arrived and destroyed them.



Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived?


I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American
Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians,"
unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage.

What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians."
I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads.



I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the
two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday.
And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian.

F.O.A.D. December 21st 13 08:18 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
On 12/21/13, 3:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous.

This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest.

As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his
degrees,
but I do enjoy some of your leaps.

He has been far more successful than you.


By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola
Tesla, who
died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist
homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which
I doubt.

Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to
slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more
successful,
there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly
neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire
Hitler?




You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a
terrorist
against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to
Harry.
Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian.


Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny
nonetheless.

The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco?




Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian.
Neither
wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by
submitting.



"Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term.


So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White,
Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native
Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh?

The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed
with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe
around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the
"taboo" words and phrases change monthly.

What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American",
"African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right.
None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there
are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not
originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward.

People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as
being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better.



Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show
says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he
wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences.

Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do
with Mr. Duck's current problems.


It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the
roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel.

Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies
violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more
concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some
goofy reality show actor says.




The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says
hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok.

If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows,
but it isn't up to me.


And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence
against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage?
Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must
follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N
word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do
you think of?



I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here
before the white man arrived and destroyed them.


Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived?


I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American
Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians,"
unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage.

What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians."
I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads.



I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the
two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday.
And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian.


So, some of your best friends are Indians, eh?

I have a few friends from India. None of them have bindi marks. So, in
your mind, they would be "dotless Indians"?

Life must be very confusing for you righties, eh?

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

BAR[_2_] December 21st 13 08:25 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
In article , says...

On 12/21/13, 10:41 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:28:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 12/21/13, 12:45 AM,
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:44:36 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he
says hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such
behavior is ok.


You have no problem saying hateful things about anyone with religious
beliefs and you can't stand anyone expressing those beliefs in public
places.
That also seems to be a common thread through the "liberal" community.

If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows, but
it isn't up to me.

Nor is it up to you to decide what these people say when answering a
direct question, designed to get this guy to say what he did.
I was amused watching the lefties try to explain why Alex Baldwin
calling a guy he was mad at a "****ing faggot" was OK and this was
bad. The excuse basically came down to "he is one of us" (a flaming
liberal).


Baldwin lost his show.


Huh? What show? 30 Rock was leaving before that comment.


Baldwin had a show on MSNBC and lost it after about two weeks or
so...after making his idiotic comments.


Who knew he had a show on MSNBC? He must not have had much of a audience.

I'm sorry Bashir lost his show...his comments about Snowbilly Sarah were
on the mark.


Therein lies your biggest problem.

BAR[_2_] December 21st 13 08:27 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
In article , says...

On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:17:39 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:20:11 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

"Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term.

You obviously don't know anything about the ancient peoples, medieval
history, or 19th and 20th Century history of that part of the Middle East.

There were at least two times when Partition, or the creation of two
separate nations, was offered to the self-described Palestinians...about
100 years ago and right after World War II. They turned it down both
times and in 1948, the Arab nations initiated a war against Israel. The
Israelis fought back and the Arabs lost.


The question is how many of those "Israelis" lived in Palestine five
years before that war? Virtually none of them. They were in Europe.
It certainly sounds like an invasion and subjugation of the native
population by europeans to me. Just another crusade.
The reality is that nobody gave a **** about brown people in those
days and they just ignored it.
After the fall of the Ottomans in WWI and the withdrawal of the
British after WWII, they thought nobody actually owned the land, at
least nobody who could fight back.


Conquest and subgation is a constant occurence during the history of man. Why is it any worse
now than it was 200, 400, 1000, 2000 or 4000 years ago? Within the last 100 years the borders
of many countries have been changed, many numerous times. Just take a look at the European
continent 100 years ago vs. today.


With one glaring exception WWII was the end of conquests. The European
powers gave up their colonies and in the intervening years the last
vestiges of European (and American) control of their conquests went
away.
For the US that would include Okinawa, the Philippines, Panama and
some say Miami.


You are deluded if your believe that WWII was the end of conquests.

Mr. Luddite December 21st 13 09:02 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
On 12/21/2013 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 05:27:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/21/2013 1:43 AM,
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:05:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla,
who died in abject poverty

By just about any standard Paris Hilton is more successful. Tesla may
have been pretty smart but virtually everything he tried to do,
failed.




Financially, yes ... technically the guy was beyond genius ... which is
likely why he failed financially.


He literally knew just enough to be dangerous.
One of the schemes that drove him into bankruptcy was trying to "beam"
usable electrical power into homes with a megawatt transmitter and an
antenna on your roof.




Modern day experiments have proved his concept to be viable and
technically achievable.

He was a space shot, no question, but without him we'd have waited much
longer for induction motors and the distribution of AC power. If Edison
had his way, we'd be working off a horrible DC distribution system.



F.O.A.D. December 21st 13 09:59 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
On 12/21/13, 4:02 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/21/2013 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 05:27:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/21/2013 1:43 AM,
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:05:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola Tesla,
who died in abject poverty

By just about any standard Paris Hilton is more successful. Tesla may
have been pretty smart but virtually everything he tried to do,
failed.




Financially, yes ... technically the guy was beyond genius ... which is
likely why he failed financially.


He literally knew just enough to be dangerous.
One of the schemes that drove him into bankruptcy was trying to "beam"
usable electrical power into homes with a megawatt transmitter and an
antenna on your roof.




Modern day experiments have proved his concept to be viable and
technically achievable.

He was a space shot, no question, but without him we'd have waited much
longer for induction motors and the distribution of AC power. If Edison
had his way, we'd be working off a horrible DC distribution system.




Gregg admires Paris Hilton more because she made a lot more money than
Tesla. Paris Hilton also makes a lot more money than Jonas Salk ever
did, and assuredly more than Albert Einstein ever made.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

Califbill December 21st 13 10:08 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 3:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous.

This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest.

As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his
degrees,
but I do enjoy some of your leaps.

He has been far more successful than you.


By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola
Tesla, who
died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist
homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which
I doubt.

Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to
slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more
successful,
there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly
neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire
Hitler?




You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a
terrorist
against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to
Harry.
Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian.


Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny
nonetheless.

The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco?




Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian.
Neither
wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by
submitting.



"Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term.


So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White,
Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native
Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh?

The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed
with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe
around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the
"taboo" words and phrases change monthly.

What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American",
"African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right.
None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there
are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not
originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward.

People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as
being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better.



Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show
says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he
wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences.

Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do
with Mr. Duck's current problems.


It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the
roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel.

Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies
violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more
concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some
goofy reality show actor says.




The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says
hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok.

If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows,
but it isn't up to me.


And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence
against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage?
Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must
follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N
word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do
you think of?



I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here
before the white man arrived and destroyed them.


Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived?


I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American
Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians,"
unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage.

What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians."
I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads.



I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the
two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday.
And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian.


So, some of your best friends are Indians, eh?

I have a few friends from India. None of them have bindi marks. So, in
your mind, they would be "dotless Indians"?

Life must be very confusing for you righties, eh?



They only wear Bindi for special occasions.

F.O.A.D. December 21st 13 10:17 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
On 12/21/13, 5:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 3:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous.

This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest.

As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his
degrees,
but I do enjoy some of your leaps.

He has been far more successful than you.


By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola
Tesla, who
died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist
homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which
I doubt.

Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to
slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more
successful,
there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly
neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire
Hitler?




You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a
terrorist
against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to
Harry.
Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian.


Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny
nonetheless.

The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco?




Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian.
Neither
wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by
submitting.



"Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term.


So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White,
Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native
Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh?

The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed
with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe
around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the
"taboo" words and phrases change monthly.

What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American",
"African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right.
None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there
are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not
originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward.

People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as
being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better.



Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show
says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he
wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences.

Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do
with Mr. Duck's current problems.


It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the
roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel.

Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies
violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more
concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some
goofy reality show actor says.




The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says
hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok.

If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows,
but it isn't up to me.


And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence
against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage?
Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must
follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N
word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do
you think of?



I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here
before the white man arrived and destroyed them.


Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived?


I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American
Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians,"
unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage.

What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians."
I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have on their foreheads.


I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the
two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday.
And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian.


So, some of your best friends are Indians, eh?

I have a few friends from India. None of them have bindi marks. So, in
your mind, they would be "dotless Indians"?

Life must be very confusing for you righties, eh?



They only wear Bindi for special occasions.


"They," your friends, or people from India generally, because if you
think the latter, you are wrong. Many people from India don't bother
with it, period. My first friend from India was a reporter who was hired
by the KC Star about the same time I was. He never wore a bindi. My wife
had a colleague from India. She never wears a bindi, either.

There are many "dotfree" people from India.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

Califbill December 21st 13 10:32 PM

Scalia supports Duck Dynasty Star
 
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 5:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 3:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/21/13, 12:43 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 11:01 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 9:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 9:21 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 8:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/20/2013 7:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/20/13, 7:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 4:12 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/20/13, 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:39:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

I find your championing of the so-called Palestinians humorous.

This is the last nagging remnant of European conquest.

As for the Duckman, I was commenting on his intellect, not his
degrees,
but I do enjoy some of your leaps.

He has been far more successful than you.


By your $tandard$, Paris Hilton is more successful than Nikola
Tesla, who
died in abject poverty. I find nothing to admire about a racist
homophobe, even if he is only playing a role acting that way, which
I doubt.

Hey, Hitler was successful for many years, right? And he managed to
slaughter at least 7 million people, and if he had been more
successful,
there wouldn't have been any Jews left to hassle your friendly
neighborhood terrorist Palestinians, eh? So how much do you admire
Hitler?




You seem to think the noble Redman Indian, was okay being a
terrorist
against the whites, and even now they are down trodden according to
Harry.
Substitute Palestinian for feather Indian.


Funny stuff, Bilious. Wrong, of course, and ignorant, but funny
nonetheless.

The Redman Indian...is that a line of chewing tobacco?




Nope, that differentiates the Feather Indian from the Dot Indian.
Neither
wrong nor ignorant. You would just take being overtaken by
submitting.



"Redman" in connection with Native Americans is a derogatory term.


So, I suppose when Al Sharpton bellows, "I don't care if you're White,
Red, Black, Blue or Purple", he's being derogatory to Whites, Native
Americans, Blacks, Smurfs and Barney, huh?

The pseudo-intellectual liberals in this country have become so obsessed
with being "politically correct" that they expect everyone to tip-toe
around with words in fear of offending someone. It seems like the
"taboo" words and phrases change monthly.

What's in favor this month, "Black", "Afro-American",
"African-American" or "person of color"? I never seem to get it right.
None make too much sense except maybe "person of color" because there
are plenty of darker skinned people who's direct ancestry does not
originate in Africa. But "person of color seems a bit awkward.

People need to relax, get real and chill out. Just identify people as
being cool, a jerk or an idiot. Works much better.



Right, we should just say nothing when the TV star of a popular show
says or writes horrible things. Hey, Mr. Duck can say whatever he
wants...he just has to realize there may be consequences.

Love the morons raising First Amendment issues. They have nothing to do
with Mr. Duck's current problems.


It's a stupid TV show. That's all. Watch it's ratings go through the
roof now. Don't like it? Turn it off or change the channel.

Damn, there's a hell of a lot of much worse programing that glorifies
violence and killing in all it's gory detail. I think we should be more
concerned on the influences on society of that instead of what some
goofy reality show actor says.




The problem is the "star" has a huge following of morons who when he says
hateful things about groups of people, his followers think such behavior is ok.

If it were up to me, I'd get rid of all the moronic reality shows,
but it isn't up to me.


And we have rappers with even a larger following, that espouse violence
against women, shooting cops and other people. Where is your outrage?
Where is MSNBC and CNN outrage? Very selective in your opinions! Must
follow the DNC guidelines! Where is your outrage about Blacks using the N
word and other derogatory words? And if you say only Indian, what group do
you think of?



I don't use the term "Indian" to refer to the peoples who were here
before the white man arrived and destroyed them.


Do you use Asian immigrants, from when they first arrived?


I don't call them "Redman Indians," or "Feather Indians." American
Indians is a term acceptable to most, along with just plain "Indians,"
unless you are referring to the Alaskans, who prefer a different usage.

What was your derogatory term for people from India...ah..."Dot Indians."
I presume you are referring to the bindi some people from India have
on their foreheads.


I live in an area with both type Indians. Is used to differentiate the
two. Fact is, we were at dot Indian friends house for dinner on Tuesday.
And one of my aunt's was 1/2 Cherokee feather Indian.


So, some of your best friends are Indians, eh?

I have a few friends from India. None of them have bindi marks. So, in
your mind, they would be "dotless Indians"?

Life must be very confusing for you righties, eh?



They only wear Bindi for special occasions.


"They," your friends, or people from India generally, because if you
think the latter, you are wrong. Many people from India don't bother with
it, period. My first friend from India was a reporter who was hired by
the KC Star about the same time I was. He never wore a bindi. My wife had
a colleague from India. She never wears a bindi, either.

There are many "dotfree" people from India.



Most of the dot Indians in this area!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com