On 11/6/13, 3:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2013 2:30 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/6/13, 2:24 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2013 12:06 PM, Hank© wrote:

On 11/6/2013 9:41 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 11/6/13, 9:37 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


Rockefeller's informal summary of the Committee's findings was a
strong
endorsement of the liberal "Bush lied us into war" mantra. Only
problem is, the details of his own report do not back up his
assertion,
nor the narrative liberals have adopted. The report contends that
every claim and statement made by administration officials,
including GW
Bush during the buildup to the war was "substantiated" by available
intelligence reports at the time.







Except that the intel was "cooked..."


ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY. You're worse than Scotty.

Classic case of repeating something often enough to the point where
people actually believe it. They usually can't prove it and often
can't remember where they first heard it. But, if it fits their agenda,
why not go for it?




It was what, a decade ago? Why would I remember precisely where I heard
or saw reports that Bush et al cooked the intel?


Because as someone who constantly accuses Bush of "Lying", you should
be able to remember why you believe that.

You just joined the bandwagon.



Yeah, sure. Whatever.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.