On 10/18/2013 9:01 PM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 7:45:19 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/18/13, 8:32 PM, Tim wrote:

On Friday, October 18, 2013 5:22:05 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 10/18/13, 6:15 PM, Tim wrote:



On Thursday, October 17, 2013 4:53:19 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



"...born again believer in Jesus Christ," says Michelle Bachmann,







offering up her rationale for opposing the Affordable Care Act. And







Bachmann is not the only self-described Christian who uses her religion







to come out against the ACA.















Perhaps one of you "born agains" can explain what there is in







Christianity that is against helping those who need it obtain health







care insurance.







Since when was Christianity supposed to deal with insurance?















Uh, I think you missed the point. Bachmann is using her simple-minded



religious beliefs to come out against health care coverage for those who



can't otherwise get it. The question should be, why is it relevant to



use your religious belief to keep health insurance away from others?



Why are Christians in this country so adamant about pushing their



beliefs onto others who believe differently? (Not that I believe



Bachmann has any beliefs, other than the "righteousness" of sounding



really stupid)



You're statement that I was replying to was:



"Perhaps one of you "born agains" can explain what there is in

Christianity that is against helping those who need it obtain health care insurance. "



Now that you mentioned it though, why do you feel so adamant about pushing your political beliefs onto others who believe differently?





I'm not pushing anything. My political beliefs do not prevent anyone

from obtaining coverage under the ACA.

sure you are.

that would be like after a street sermon, a preacher or religious leader saying "I'm not pushing anything. My religious beliefs do not force anyone from or into accepting a religious faith"

But, if you really feel like you're not pushing any political thing, then why is it at almost every thread you make is swelled with it?


snerk

"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 10/18/2013 10:26 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 10/18/2013 8:45 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I'm not pushing anything. My political beliefs do not prevent anyone
from obtaining coverage under the ACA.

No, what prevents anyone from obtaining coverage under the ACA is an
impossible to navigate federal website and general lack of interest by the public.

I read somewhere today that the contract to develop the website was given
to a Canadian controlled company who used 10 year old technology in it's
three year development. It also has incurred cost overruns that has more
than doubled the original cost.

Eugene Robinson had it right today when he said, "A group of overly
caffeinated 20 year olds could have done a better job".

Why does the government need to pay extra when the let a contract for a
specified amount for the job? Would you hire a contractor to build a new
swimming pool and then when he gets 25% done, he says oops! I under bid the
price. You will have to pay 3 times as much to get the job finished?


Depends on the type of contract. Some are "fixed price". Many
government contracts are "cost plus" where the actual costs plus an
allowable profit are billed. Contractors to the government love these.

Yup, like the original BART rapid transit contract. The contractors said,
$700 million. Cost plus 10%. About $3.5 billion!

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:53:19 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:


YOU...are a sweaty, fat, pustule ridden ****...just like your pal DICK.

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 7:55:34 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
so if you are that

interested, get to work.

Why don't you fat ass...instead of living in that basement, picking your pustules and fantasizing about shooting a caller at your door?

On Friday, October 18, 2013 4:56:17 PM UTC-4, wrote:
What Harry saw? Who knows?

The only thing fat ass krause sees is Cockhole White swallowing his cock on a daily basis on here.

On Friday, October 18, 2013 9:01:30 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:

Politics *is* religion to some, including Harry.

Shut up asswipe and go pick your scabs.

I HOPE IT HURTS LIKE **** !!!!!!

On 10/18/13, 8:32 PM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 5:22:05 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/18/13, 6:15 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 4:53:19 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

"...born again believer in Jesus Christ," says Michelle Bachmann,



offering up her rationale for opposing the Affordable Care Act. And



Bachmann is not the only self-described Christian who uses her religion



to come out against the ACA.







Perhaps one of you "born agains" can explain what there is in



Christianity that is against helping those who need it obtain health



care insurance.



Since when was Christianity supposed to deal with insurance?







Uh, I think you missed the point. Bachmann is using her simple-minded

religious beliefs to come out against health care coverage for those who

can't otherwise get it. The question should be, why is it relevant to

use your religious belief to keep health insurance away from others?

Why are Christians in this country so adamant about pushing their

beliefs onto others who believe differently? (Not that I believe

Bachmann has any beliefs, other than the "righteousness" of sounding

really stupid)

You're statement that I was replying to was:

"Perhaps one of you "born agains" can explain what there is in
Christianity that is against helping those who need it obtain health care insurance. "

Now that you mentioned it though, why do you feel so adamant about pushing your political beliefs onto others who believe differently?



My question still stands...why are (some prominent) Christians in this
country using their religious beliefs to try to keep health insurance
away from others? These "objectors" mention their Christianity on one
hand and then tie it to their objections about the ACA. I understand
that some of them "object" because the ACA provides coverage for womens'
health issues that include contraception, but it seems to be if that is
the objection then it is the duty of those Christians to try to convince
their followers not to use it, but not to try to force their beliefs on
those who feel otherwise.

I'm not pushing my beliefs on anyone. I don't care whether you agree
with me or not, and I'm not interested in legislation or rule-making
that pushes my onto others who feel differently. I simply ask for the
same courtesy: keep your damned religion out of my state, as it were.

On 10/19/2013 9:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/18/13, 8:32 PM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 5:22:05 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/18/13, 6:15 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 4:53:19 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

"...born again believer in Jesus Christ," says Michelle Bachmann,



offering up her rationale for opposing the Affordable Care Act. And



Bachmann is not the only self-described Christian who uses her
religion



to come out against the ACA.







Perhaps one of you "born agains" can explain what there is in



Christianity that is against helping those who need it obtain health



care insurance.



Since when was Christianity supposed to deal with insurance?







Uh, I think you missed the point. Bachmann is using her simple-minded

religious beliefs to come out against health care coverage for those who

can't otherwise get it. The question should be, why is it relevant to

use your religious belief to keep health insurance away from others?

Why are Christians in this country so adamant about pushing their

beliefs onto others who believe differently? (Not that I believe

Bachmann has any beliefs, other than the "righteousness" of sounding

really stupid)

You're statement that I was replying to was:

"Perhaps one of you "born agains" can explain what there is in
Christianity that is against helping those who need it obtain health
care insurance. "

Now that you mentioned it though, why do you feel so adamant about
pushing your political beliefs onto others who believe differently?



My question still stands...why are (some prominent) Progressives in this
country using their religious beliefs to try to take the long standing
health insurance
away from others?

On 10/19/13, 9:58 AM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/19/2013 9:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/18/13, 8:32 PM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 5:22:05 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/18/13, 6:15 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 4:53:19 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

"...born again believer in Jesus Christ," says Michelle Bachmann,



offering up her rationale for opposing the Affordable Care Act. And



Bachmann is not the only self-described Christian who uses her
religion



to come out against the ACA.







Perhaps one of you "born agains" can explain what there is in



Christianity that is against helping those who need it obtain health



care insurance.



Since when was Christianity supposed to deal with insurance?







Uh, I think you missed the point. Bachmann is using her simple-minded

religious beliefs to come out against health care coverage for those
who

can't otherwise get it. The question should be, why is it relevant to

use your religious belief to keep health insurance away from others?

Why are Christians in this country so adamant about pushing their

beliefs onto others who believe differently? (Not that I believe

Bachmann has any beliefs, other than the "righteousness" of sounding

really stupid)

You're statement that I was replying to was:

"Perhaps one of you "born agains" can explain what there is in
Christianity that is against helping those who need it obtain health
care insurance. "

Now that you mentioned it though, why do you feel so adamant about
pushing your political beliefs onto others who believe differently?



My question still stands...why are (some prominent) Progressives in this
country using their religious beliefs to try to take the long standing
health insurance
away from others?



You took too many of your anti-psychotic pills this morning.

On 10/19/2013 9:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
keep your damned religion out of my state, as it were.

That's easy enough, since your state is intolerance and ignorance.
I hope that's accommodation enough for you.