On 10/18/13, 8:24 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:54:03 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote:
Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:19:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 10/17/13, 6:17 PM, Tim wrote:



On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:







I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I







do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for







several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a







violation of the Second Amendment.







The Second Amendment?







How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the right of

and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms?











First amendment...my mistake. Yeah, great idea...take your guns to



church, and if the preacher gets him wrong, why, just shoot him and



everyone else you can. Terrific.



Why would you encourage foul gun play?



Sarcasm,

Harry, that wasn't funny even as a joke.


We don't take gun violence seriously in this country, so what else is
there but sarcasm?

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/18/13, 8:24 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:54:03 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote:
Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:19:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 10/17/13, 6:17 PM, Tim wrote:



On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:







I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I







do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for







several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a







violation of the Second Amendment.







The Second Amendment?







How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the right of

and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms?











First amendment...my mistake. Yeah, great idea...take your guns to



church, and if the preacher gets him wrong, why, just shoot him and



everyone else you can. Terrific.



Why would you encourage foul gun play?



Sarcasm,

Harry, that wasn't funny even as a joke.


We don't take gun violence seriously in this country, so what else is there but sarcasm?

There are sick *******s like you that seem to have to own firearms and
threaten others with them.

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/18/13, 6:47 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/18/13, 5:41 PM, Califbill wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



In other words.."Dangerous"





Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:

*inappropriate* ?



Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?



inappropriate:



Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.



dangerous:



Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,

hazardous, risky, unsafe.



Do you think these words are synonyms?

What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a
building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just
might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in
you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed
appropriate.



It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist
between church and state.

What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"...

Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh?

Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the
constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no
state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding
documents.


You don't understand the 1st Amendment or the disdain many of the
founding fathers had for religion. And what has god to do with religion,
assuming for the moment there were a god?

You did not learn the 1st amendment was to prevent a state religion? Ala
Church do England?


The First Amendment is there for a number of reasons, including the
desire to prevent establishment of a state religion.

The religious clause was there for just one reason. NO STATE RELIGION!

In article 417142672403824078.069666bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



In other words.."Dangerous"





Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:

*inappropriate* ?



Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?



inappropriate:



Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.



dangerous:



Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,

hazardous, risky, unsafe.



Do you think these words are synonyms?

What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a
building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just
might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in
you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed
appropriate.



It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist
between church and state.

What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"...

Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh?

Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the
constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no
state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding
documents.

So you don't consider that a "wall" between church and state? Now, I
never, ever said that the founding fathers ever intended for there to be
no religion, no prayer etc.

In article , says...

On 10/18/13, 8:24 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:54:03 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote:
Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:19:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 10/17/13, 6:17 PM, Tim wrote:



On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:







I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I







do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for







several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a







violation of the Second Amendment.







The Second Amendment?







How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the right of

and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms?











First amendment...my mistake. Yeah, great idea...take your guns to



church, and if the preacher gets him wrong, why, just shoot him and



everyone else you can. Terrific.



Why would you encourage foul gun play?



Sarcasm,

Harry, that wasn't funny even as a joke.


We don't take gun violence seriously in this country, so what else is
there but sarcasm?

Who but the right would want everybody to own a dangerous firearm, but
be against healthcare for everybody?

In article 417142672403824078.069666bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



In other words.."Dangerous"





Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:

*inappropriate* ?



Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?



inappropriate:



Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.



dangerous:



Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,

hazardous, risky, unsafe.



Do you think these words are synonyms?

What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a
building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just
might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in
you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed
appropriate.



It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist
between church and state.

What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"...

Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh?

Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the
constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no
state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding
documents.

History isn't your strong point, as well as reading comprehension....

http://tinyurl.com/7o44m

In article , says...

On 10/18/2013 6:19 PM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 4:58:18 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
And what has god to do with religion,

assuming for the moment there were a god?



??????


It's a troll Tim...

Why is that a troll? Do you have some evidence that there is a god?

In article 1910862206403841873.295628bmckeenospam-
, says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/18/13, 6:47 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/18/13, 5:41 PM, Califbill wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



In other words.."Dangerous"





Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:

*inappropriate* ?



Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?



inappropriate:



Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.



dangerous:



Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,

hazardous, risky, unsafe.



Do you think these words are synonyms?

What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a
building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just
might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in
you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed
appropriate.



It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist
between church and state.

What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"...

Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh?

Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the
constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no
state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding
documents.


You don't understand the 1st Amendment or the disdain many of the
founding fathers had for religion. And what has god to do with religion,
assuming for the moment there were a god?

You did not learn the 1st amendment was to prevent a state religion? Ala
Church do England?


The First Amendment is there for a number of reasons, including the
desire to prevent establishment of a state religion.

The religious clause was there for just one reason. NO STATE RELIGION!

http://tinyurl.com/7o44m

On 10/19/13 6:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 1910862206403841873.295628bmckeenospam-
, says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/18/13, 6:47 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/18/13, 5:41 PM, Califbill wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



In other words.."Dangerous"





Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:

*inappropriate* ?



Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?



inappropriate:



Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.



dangerous:



Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,

hazardous, risky, unsafe.



Do you think these words are synonyms?

What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a
building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just
might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in
you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed
appropriate.



It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist
between church and state.

What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"...

Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh?

Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the
constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no
state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding
documents.


You don't understand the 1st Amendment or the disdain many of the
founding fathers had for religion. And what has god to do with religion,
assuming for the moment there were a god?

You did not learn the 1st amendment was to prevent a state religion? Ala
Church do England?


The First Amendment is there for a number of reasons, including the
desire to prevent establishment of a state religion.

The religious clause was there for just one reason. NO STATE RELIGION!

http://tinyurl.com/7o44m

Where does it say it in the Constitution? Free exercise of religion is
also supported. Harry can not stand that part. Do we have a state
religion? How many times was God invoked by the founding fathers?

On 10/19/13 6:56 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 417142672403824078.069666bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



In other words.."Dangerous"





Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:

*inappropriate* ?



Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?



inappropriate:



Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.



dangerous:



Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,

hazardous, risky, unsafe.



Do you think these words are synonyms?

What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a
building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just
might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in
you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed
appropriate.



It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist
between church and state.

What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"...

Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh?

Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the
constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no
state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding
documents.

History isn't your strong point, as well as reading comprehension....

http://tinyurl.com/7o44m

Is a strong point. Do we have a State Religion? How many religions are
allowed in Congress?