On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:18:49 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 8:37 PM, Tim wrote:

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:44:21 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 10/16/13, 7:05 AM, Tim wrote:



On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:35:43 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



On 10/16/13, 1:31 AM, Tim wrote:







On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:50:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:















This is what us rightie-Christian-fundies do. If people are hungry we feed them regardless of who they are.































And you know, it seems that nobody accuses us of 'shoving' religion down their throats especially when they have their mouths full.















































No religion accompanying the meals, eh?















I didn't say that. you did.















- - -















You're proselytizing the hungry, eh?







You didn't read the article.











Sure I did. My question stands.



And my answer is... 'no'



Now the point I'm making is I'd like to know why the furloughed gov't employees aren't flocking to the gov't programs for food? Because they're not available? or maybe it takes too long and too much red tape for assistance? When people are hungry they need fed. That's what churches do. feed people. Body first and soul second.



Prov. 22:9 Happy is the generous man, the one who feeds the poor.



James 2:14- 17 Dear brothers, what's the use of saying that you have faith and are Christians if you aren't proving it by helping others? Will that kind of faith save anyone? If you have a friend who is in need of food and clothing, and you say to him, "Well, good-bye and God bless you; stay warm and eat hearty," and then don't give him clothes or food, what good does that do? So you see, it isn't enough just to have faith. You must also do good to prove that you have it. Faith that doesn't show itself by good works is no faith at all--it is dead and useless.



I'm sure you'll try to find some spiritual trade-offs for food and clothing in there, Harry But there aren't any. So, now that you've read my questions, they stand as well.





Most food banks are not operated by government agencies.

Well then, why not?



So long as

religion isn't piled on the plate with the food, I tip my hat to

religious organizations that feed the hungry.

You mean in the same way that if a church or religious institution is to be used as a polling place they should cover up any crosses or icons?

On 10/16/13, 9:36 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:18:49 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 8:37 PM, Tim wrote:

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:44:21 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 10/16/13, 7:05 AM, Tim wrote:



On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:35:43 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



On 10/16/13, 1:31 AM, Tim wrote:







On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:50:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:















This is what us rightie-Christian-fundies do. If people are hungry we feed them regardless of who they are.































And you know, it seems that nobody accuses us of 'shoving' religion down their throats especially when they have their mouths full.















































No religion accompanying the meals, eh?















I didn't say that. you did.















- - -















You're proselytizing the hungry, eh?







You didn't read the article.











Sure I did. My question stands.



And my answer is... 'no'



Now the point I'm making is I'd like to know why the furloughed gov't employees aren't flocking to the gov't programs for food? Because they're not available? or maybe it takes too long and too much red tape for assistance? When people are hungry they need fed. That's what churches do. feed people. Body first and soul second.



Prov. 22:9 Happy is the generous man, the one who feeds the poor.



James 2:14- 17 Dear brothers, what's the use of saying that you have faith and are Christians if you aren't proving it by helping others? Will that kind of faith save anyone? If you have a friend who is in need of food and clothing, and you say to him, "Well, good-bye and God bless you; stay warm and eat hearty," and then don't give him clothes or food, what good does that do? So you see, it isn't enough just to have faith. You must also do good to prove that you have it. Faith that doesn't show itself by good works is no faith at all--it is dead and useless.



I'm sure you'll try to find some spiritual trade-offs for food and clothing in there, Harry But there aren't any. So, now that you've read my questions, they stand as well.





Most food banks are not operated by government agencies.

Well then, why not?



So long as

religion isn't piled on the plate with the food, I tip my hat to

religious organizations that feed the hungry.

You mean in the same way that if a church or religious institution is to be used as a polling place they should cover up any crosses or icons?



I am absolutely opposed to any religious building being used as a
polling place, and I fought against that in Florida.

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:03:45 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 9:36 PM, Tim wrote:

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:18:49 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 10/16/13, 8:37 PM, Tim wrote:



On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:44:21 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



On 10/16/13, 7:05 AM, Tim wrote:







On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:35:43 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:







On 10/16/13, 1:31 AM, Tim wrote:















On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:50:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:































This is what us rightie-Christian-fundies do. If people are hungry we feed them regardless of who they are.































































And you know, it seems that nobody accuses us of 'shoving' religion down their throats especially when they have their mouths full.































































































No religion accompanying the meals, eh?































I didn't say that. you did.































- - -































You're proselytizing the hungry, eh?















You didn't read the article.























Sure I did. My question stands.







And my answer is... 'no'







Now the point I'm making is I'd like to know why the furloughed gov't employees aren't flocking to the gov't programs for food? Because they're not available? or maybe it takes too long and too much red tape for assistance? When people are hungry they need fed. That's what churches do. feed people. Body first and soul second.







Prov. 22:9 Happy is the generous man, the one who feeds the poor.







James 2:14- 17 Dear brothers, what's the use of saying that you have faith and are Christians if you aren't proving it by helping others? Will that kind of faith save anyone? If you have a friend who is in need of food and clothing, and you say to him, "Well, good-bye and God bless you; stay warm and eat hearty," and then don't give him clothes or food, what good does that do? So you see, it isn't enough just to have faith. You must also do good to prove that you have it. Faith that doesn't show itself by good works is no faith at all--it is dead and useless.







I'm sure you'll try to find some spiritual trade-offs for food and clothing in there, Harry But there aren't any. So, now that you've read my questions, they stand as well.











Most food banks are not operated by government agencies.



Well then, why not?







So long as



religion isn't piled on the plate with the food, I tip my hat to



religious organizations that feed the hungry.



You mean in the same way that if a church or religious institution is to be used as a polling place they should cover up any crosses or icons?







I am absolutely opposed to any religious building being used as a

polling place, and I fought against that in Florida.

Now that's being a champion of a cause, I guess. So why should church's and religious institutions are 'dangerous' then why should they be allowed to feed and cloth those who are without? That is the governments job, isn't it?

BTW, my questions still stand.

On 10/16/2013 10:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 9:36 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:18:49 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 8:37 PM, Tim wrote:

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:44:21 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 10/16/13, 7:05 AM, Tim wrote:



On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:35:43 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



On 10/16/13, 1:31 AM, Tim wrote:







On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:50:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:















This is what us rightie-Christian-fundies do. If people are
hungry we feed them regardless of who they are.































And you know, it seems that nobody accuses us of 'shoving'
religion down their throats especially when they have their
mouths full.















































No religion accompanying the meals, eh?















I didn't say that. you did.















- - -















You're proselytizing the hungry, eh?







You didn't read the article.











Sure I did. My question stands.



And my answer is... 'no'



Now the point I'm making is I'd like to know why the furloughed
gov't employees aren't flocking to the gov't programs for food?
Because they're not available? or maybe it takes too long and too
much red tape for assistance? When people are hungry they need fed.
That's what churches do. feed people. Body first and soul second.



Prov. 22:9 Happy is the generous man, the one who feeds the poor.



James 2:14- 17 Dear brothers, what's the use of saying that you
have faith and are Christians if you aren't proving it by helping
others? Will that kind of faith save anyone? If you have a friend
who is in need of food and clothing, and you say to him, "Well,
good-bye and God bless you; stay warm and eat hearty," and then
don't give him clothes or food, what good does that do? So you see,
it isn't enough just to have faith. You must also do good to prove
that you have it. Faith that doesn't show itself by good works is no
faith at all--it is dead and useless.



I'm sure you'll try to find some spiritual trade-offs for food and
clothing in there, Harry But there aren't any. So, now that you've
read my questions, they stand as well.





Most food banks are not operated by government agencies.

Well then, why not?



So long as

religion isn't piled on the plate with the food, I tip my hat to

religious organizations that feed the hungry.

You mean in the same way that if a church or religious institution is
to be used as a polling place they should cover up any crosses or icons?



I am absolutely opposed to any religious building being used as a
polling place, and I fought against that in Florida.

The battle between good and evil continues. Harry, you are making a fool
of yourself. Carryon.

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:57:43 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

Harry, you are making a fool
of yourself. Carry on.

===

But you have to admire his expertise...

:=)

On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:34:36 PM UTC-4, Hank© wrote:

You know what they do when they catch folks like Harry? Let's just say,

Harry would be pecking away at his keyboard with a pencil in his mouth.


No, coward krause would try to figure out a way to say that they invaded his house so he could shoot them with his Roy Rogers Cap Gun !!

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 10:03:45 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I am absolutely opposed to any religious building being used as a

polling place, and I fought against that in Florida.


Was that after you ripped people off and went bankrupt there , or before??

On 10/17/2013 12:07 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:57:43 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

Harry, you are making a fool
of yourself. Carry on.

===

But you have to admire his expertise...

:=)

Did you mean to say acknowledge? AFAIK only Don White admires Krause the
louse.

On 10/16/13, 10:39 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:03:45 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 9:36 PM, Tim wrote:




You mean in the same way that if a church or religious institution is to be used as a polling place they should cover up any crosses or icons?







I am absolutely opposed to any religious building being used as a

polling place, and I fought against that in Florida.

Now that's being a champion of a cause, I guess. So why should church's and religious institutions are 'dangerous' then why should they be allowed to feed and cloth those who are without? That is the governments job, isn't it?

BTW, my questions still stand.


I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I
do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for
several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a
violation of the Second Amendment.

In article , says...

On 10/16/13, 1:31 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:50:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

This is what us rightie-Christian-fundies do. If people are hungry we feed them regardless of who they are.



And you know, it seems that nobody accuses us of 'shoving' religion down their throats especially when they have their mouths full.





No religion accompanying the meals, eh?

I didn't say that. you did.

- - -

You're proselytizing the hungry, eh?

It is all about choice. If those who want to be fed aren't willing to listen a little bit of
talking while they are eating then they are free to choose to go somewhere elese and get
their food. You are pro-choice aren't you? Or, are you only pro-choice when it comes to
pregnancy?