On 10/14/2013 4:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/14/13, 4:48 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:20:54 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/14/13, 4:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
wrote:
On 14 Oct 2013 00:37:58 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:

*The* mistake was made by Dubya, who was talked into invading
Iraq and
staying there. Bush I got out in a hurry, and Clinton never went
in.

Bull****, we were bombing them weekly for 10 years. That is war, no
matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how
long?

Are you including the ones in white helmets supporting weapons
inspectors looking for those elusive WMD?

How much money for bombs, rockets, carrier combat groups for 8 years of
Clinton in charge?



What difference does that make in regard to Clinton's actions about
Iraq? What counts, or what used to count, was the number of American
lives lost.

Don't you righties care about American lives? I know you are all balled
up with fetuses, but the soldiers are here already.

Bush was bad but that does not make Clinton's wars good.



Clinton's wars in terms of U.S. casualties and involvement were blips on
the screen compared to Bush's full-scale warmongering. They are not
equivalent, no matter how many times you try to make them seem so.

So a few innocent women and children are ok to kill as long as it's a
democrat president doing it??

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:15:08 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:21:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/13/13, 12:02 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Blowing up Iraq and forcing our style of democracy on them!!

http://tinyurl.com/n4tblvd



No one with a working brain really expected Iraq to "turn out ok." The
entire exercise was a waste of American and allied lives and money, an
albatross that forever will hang around Dubya's neck.

We'll be greated with parades of flowers! We'll have access to all
their oil, the revenue from which will be used to rebuild their
country!

It won't cost us a dime.

Dick Cheney.

Seems like you guys were the ones screaming, "It's all for their oil!" Well, where's the oil?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:34:29 -0400, John H wrote:

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:02:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Blowing up Iraq and forcing our style of democracy on them!!

http://tinyurl.com/n4tblvd

Iraq was not one of Bush's finer moments. You'd think the dumb **** we've got in the White House now
would have learned something. But no, he goes for Afjhanistand, Egypt, Libya, and Syria trying to do
the same stupid thing.
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


....'Afghanistan', for those who care.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

On 10/14/2013 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:53:10 -0400, Charlemagne
wrote:

On 10/13/2013 8:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how long?


Doesn't matter, what matters in war, is how many bodies get left in
pieces on the ground..... And Clinton left his mark for sure....

Clinton engaged in more military interventions than any other
president in history.


He killed arab women and children, Progressives are cool with that...

On 10/14/2013 12:15 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/14/13, 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:55:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/14/13, 11:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:53:10 -0400, Charlemagne
wrote:

On 10/13/2013 8:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how
long?


Doesn't matter, what matters in war, is how many bodies get left in
pieces on the ground..... And Clinton left his mark for sure....

Clinton engaged in more military interventions than any other
president in history.

So? Let's talk about troop amounts and $$.....



Fretmore.

Really? you too?
Are you all 13?





In these discussions, I judge the seriousness of war from the United
States perspective of how many troops we have on the ground, how long
they are on the ground, where they are on the ground, how many United
States casualties there are, how much the war costs the United States in
money and materiel, et cetera.




When Bush was president you could care less about the American Soldiers,
only the Iraqi and other foreign fighters and their support families...

On 10/14/13, 9:09 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/14/2013 12:15 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/14/13, 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:55:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/14/13, 11:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:53:10 -0400, Charlemagne
wrote:

On 10/13/2013 8:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how
long?


Doesn't matter, what matters in war, is how many bodies get left in
pieces on the ground..... And Clinton left his mark for sure....

Clinton engaged in more military interventions than any other
president in history.

So? Let's talk about troop amounts and $$.....



Fretmore.

Really? you too?
Are you all 13?





In these discussions, I judge the seriousness of war from the United
States perspective of how many troops we have on the ground, how long
they are on the ground, where they are on the ground, how many United
States casualties there are, how much the war costs the United States in
money and materiel, et cetera.




When Bush was president you could care less about the American Soldiers,
only the Iraqi and other foreign fighters and their support families...

And you wonder why thinking people call you psychotic...

On 10/14/2013 10:19 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:57:12 -0400, Charlemagne
wrote:

On 10/14/2013 4:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

You are being dishonest again, you are the one that was always
complaining about foreign lives and collateral damage, until your
preferred Murder in Cheif took over, now those Afghanistan and Pakistan
etc innocent women and children don't matter to you anymore??? So you
lefties don't care about women and children, we get that....

Harry only cares about the innocents that republicans kill. If a
democrat kills them, they needed killing.



Progressives in general seem to follow him there...

On 10/14/2013 8:57 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/14/2013 4:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/14/13, 4:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
wrote:
On 14 Oct 2013 00:37:58 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:

*The* mistake was made by Dubya, who was talked into invading Iraq
and
staying there. Bush I got out in a hurry, and Clinton never went in.

Bull****, we were bombing them weekly for 10 years. That is war, no
matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how
long?

Are you including the ones in white helmets supporting weapons
inspectors looking for those elusive WMD?

How much money for bombs, rockets, carrier combat groups for 8 years of
Clinton in charge?



What difference does that make in regard to Clinton's actions about
Iraq? What counts, or what used to count, was the number of American
lives lost.

Don't you righties care about American lives? I know you are all balled
up with fetuses, but the soldiers are here already.

You are being dishonest again, you are the one that was always
complaining about foreign lives and collateral damage, until your
preferred Murder in Cheif took over, now those Afghanistan and Pakistan
etc innocent women and children don't matter to you anymore??? So you
lefties don't care about women and children, we get that....

What matters to Harry doesn't matter. He has given nothing in return for
the comfort and safety he enjoys as an American.

On 10/14/2013 11:23 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/14/2013 8:57 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/14/2013 4:20 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/14/13, 4:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
wrote:
On 14 Oct 2013 00:37:58 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:

*The* mistake was made by Dubya, who was talked into invading Iraq
and
staying there. Bush I got out in a hurry, and Clinton never went
in.

Bull****, we were bombing them weekly for 10 years. That is war, no
matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how
long?

Are you including the ones in white helmets supporting weapons
inspectors looking for those elusive WMD?

How much money for bombs, rockets, carrier combat groups for 8 years of
Clinton in charge?



What difference does that make in regard to Clinton's actions about
Iraq? What counts, or what used to count, was the number of American
lives lost.

Don't you righties care about American lives? I know you are all balled
up with fetuses, but the soldiers are here already.

You are being dishonest again, you are the one that was always
complaining about foreign lives and collateral damage, until your
preferred Murder in Cheif took over, now those Afghanistan and Pakistan
etc innocent women and children don't matter to you anymore??? So you
lefties don't care about women and children, we get that....

What matters to Harry doesn't matter. He has given nothing in return for
the comfort and safety he enjoys as an American.

Got that right...

Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/14/2013 4:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/14/13, 4:48 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:20:54 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/14/13, 4:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
wrote:
On 14 Oct 2013 00:37:58 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:

*The* mistake was made by Dubya, who was talked into invading
Iraq and
staying there. Bush I got out in a hurry, and Clinton never went
in.

Bull****, we were bombing them weekly for 10 years. That is war, no
matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how
long?

Are you including the ones in white helmets supporting weapons
inspectors looking for those elusive WMD?

How much money for bombs, rockets, carrier combat groups for 8 years of
Clinton in charge?



What difference does that make in regard to Clinton's actions about
Iraq? What counts, or what used to count, was the number of American
lives lost.

Don't you righties care about American lives? I know you are all balled
up with fetuses, but the soldiers are here already.

Bush was bad but that does not make Clinton's wars good.



Clinton's wars in terms of U.S. casualties and involvement were blips on
the screen compared to Bush's full-scale warmongering. They are not
equivalent, no matter how many times you try to make them seem so.

So a few innocent women and children are ok to kill as long as it's a
democrat president doing it??

The original title referred to the cost of wars. Goal post movement by
Harry to now make war bad only if our soldiers get KIA or WIA.