Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

Blowing up Iraq and forcing our style of democracy on them!!

http://tinyurl.com/n4tblvd

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

On 10/13/13, 12:02 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Blowing up Iraq and forcing our style of democracy on them!!

http://tinyurl.com/n4tblvd



No one with a working brain really expected Iraq to "turn out ok." The
entire exercise was a waste of American and allied lives and money, an
albatross that forever will hang around Dubya's neck.

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

On 10/13/13, 12:59 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:21:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/13/13, 12:02 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Blowing up Iraq and forcing our style of democracy on them!!

http://tinyurl.com/n4tblvd



No one with a working brain really expected Iraq to "turn out ok." The
entire exercise was a waste of American and allied lives and money, an
albatross that forever will hang around Dubya's neck.

The real mistake was made by GHWB. He should have walked away in 1991.
Clinton made the same mistake. GW compounded it by his LBJ type "gotta
win" philosophy. Maybe it is a Texas thing.



*The* mistake was made by Dubya, who was talked into invading Iraq and
staying there. Bush I got out in a hurry, and Clinton never went in.

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

On 10/13/13 10:03 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/13/13, 12:59 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:21:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/13/13, 12:02 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Blowing up Iraq and forcing our style of democracy on them!!

http://tinyurl.com/n4tblvd



No one with a working brain really expected Iraq to "turn out ok." The
entire exercise was a waste of American and allied lives and money, an
albatross that forever will hang around Dubya's neck.

The real mistake was made by GHWB. He should have walked away in 1991.
Clinton made the same mistake. GW compounded it by his LBJ type "gotta
win" philosophy. Maybe it is a Texas thing.



*The* mistake was made by Dubya, who was talked into invading Iraq and
staying there. Bush I got out in a hurry, and Clinton never went in.
Clinton waged war also.

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:03:53 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/13/13, 12:59 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:21:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/13/13, 12:02 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Blowing up Iraq and forcing our style of democracy on them!!

http://tinyurl.com/n4tblvd



No one with a working brain really expected Iraq to "turn out ok." The
entire exercise was a waste of American and allied lives and money, an
albatross that forever will hang around Dubya's neck.

The real mistake was made by GHWB. He should have walked away in 1991.
Clinton made the same mistake. GW compounded it by his LBJ type "gotta
win" philosophy. Maybe it is a Texas thing.



*The* mistake was made by Dubya, who was talked into invading Iraq and
staying there. Bush I got out in a hurry, and Clinton never went in.

Bull****, we were bombing them weekly for 10 years. That is war, no
matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how long?

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

On Sunday, October 13, 2013 12:02:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Blowing up Iraq and forcing our style of democracy on them!!



http://tinyurl.com/n4tblvd

And now, your Economy is ****ed.

Good luck....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

On 10/13/2013 8:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how long?


Doesn't matter, what matters in war, is how many bodies get left in
pieces on the ground..... And Clinton left his mark for sure....

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

In article , says...

On 10/13/2013 8:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how long?


Doesn't matter, what matters in war, is how many bodies get left in
pieces on the ground..... And Clinton left his mark for sure....

Really? Do tell, seeing how we are comparing Clinton's war record with
Bush's, go for it!

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:53:10 -0400, Charlemagne
wrote:

On 10/13/2013 8:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how long?


Doesn't matter, what matters in war, is how many bodies get left in
pieces on the ground..... And Clinton left his mark for sure....

Clinton engaged in more military interventions than any other
president in history.

So? Let's talk about troop amounts and $$.....

Good thing Bush spent all of that money
 

On 10/14/13, 11:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:53:10 -0400, Charlemagne
wrote:

On 10/13/2013 8:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

matter how you slice it.

How many troops did Clinton put on the ground in Iraq and for how long?


Doesn't matter, what matters in war, is how many bodies get left in
pieces on the ground..... And Clinton left his mark for sure....

Clinton engaged in more military interventions than any other
president in history.

So? Let's talk about troop amounts and $$.....



Fretmore is doing his best to find false equivalencies. Funny to
read...he tries so hard.