So, the L'il coward doesn't mind revealing info and photos of properties he thinks belongs to other posters, but when he's exposed he runs crying to Google to have the image of his house smudged.
Very typical of cowardly cockroaches. I've certainly done my work here... I've exposed you to all for what you are.
What did your hero Bush say..."mission accomplished"...

On 10/8/13 10:06 AM, True North wrote:
So, the L'il coward doesn't mind revealing info and photos of properties he thinks belongs to other posters, but when he's exposed he runs crying to Google to have the image of his house smudged.
Very typical of cowardly cockroaches. I've certainly done my work here... I've exposed you to all for what you are.
What did your hero Bush say..."mission accomplished"...


Google might have blocked the shot of his house as a public service.
He's got crap, tree trash, coolers, lawn mowers, barbecue grills and
other crap all over his front lawn...it's a little bit of a West
Virginia hollow, right there in northeast Connecticut.

Strange in that neighborhood...garages with absolutely flat roofs.
Certainly the code wouldn't allow that because of the potential snow loads.

In article , says...

On 10/8/13 10:06 AM, True North wrote:
So, the L'il coward doesn't mind revealing info and photos of properties he thinks belongs to other posters, but when he's exposed he runs crying to Google to have the image of his house smudged.
Very typical of cowardly cockroaches. I've certainly done my work here... I've exposed you to all for what you are.
What did your hero Bush say..."mission accomplished"...


Google might have blocked the shot of his house as a public service.
He's got crap, tree trash, coolers, lawn mowers, barbecue grills and
other crap all over his front lawn...it's a little bit of a West
Virginia hollow, right there in northeast Connecticut.

Strange in that neighborhood...garages with absolutely flat roofs.
Certainly the code wouldn't allow that because of the potential snow loads.

Flat roof can be code compliant.

On 10/8/13 10:41 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/8/13 10:06 AM, True North wrote:
So, the L'il coward doesn't mind revealing info and photos of properties he thinks belongs to other posters, but when he's exposed he runs crying to Google to have the image of his house smudged.
Very typical of cowardly cockroaches. I've certainly done my work here... I've exposed you to all for what you are.
What did your hero Bush say..."mission accomplished"...


Google might have blocked the shot of his house as a public service.
He's got crap, tree trash, coolers, lawn mowers, barbecue grills and
other crap all over his front lawn...it's a little bit of a West
Virginia hollow, right there in northeast Connecticut.

Strange in that neighborhood...garages with absolutely flat roofs.
Certainly the code wouldn't allow that because of the potential snow loads.

Flat roof can be code compliant.


On light residential frame construction in high snow load areas? Wow...

In article , says...

On 10/8/13 10:41 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/8/13 10:06 AM, True North wrote:
So, the L'il coward doesn't mind revealing info and photos of properties he thinks belongs to other posters, but when he's exposed he runs crying to Google to have the image of his house smudged.
Very typical of cowardly cockroaches. I've certainly done my work here... I've exposed you to all for what you are.
What did your hero Bush say..."mission accomplished"...


Google might have blocked the shot of his house as a public service.
He's got crap, tree trash, coolers, lawn mowers, barbecue grills and
other crap all over his front lawn...it's a little bit of a West
Virginia hollow, right there in northeast Connecticut.

Strange in that neighborhood...garages with absolutely flat roofs.
Certainly the code wouldn't allow that because of the potential snow loads.

Flat roof can be code compliant.


On light residential frame construction in high snow load areas? Wow...

Sure, as long as it's designed for the load.

On 10/8/13 11:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/8/13 10:41 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/8/13 10:06 AM, True North wrote:
So, the L'il coward doesn't mind revealing info and photos of properties he thinks belongs to other posters, but when he's exposed he runs crying to Google to have the image of his house smudged.
Very typical of cowardly cockroaches. I've certainly done my work here... I've exposed you to all for what you are.
What did your hero Bush say..."mission accomplished"...


Google might have blocked the shot of his house as a public service.
He's got crap, tree trash, coolers, lawn mowers, barbecue grills and
other crap all over his front lawn...it's a little bit of a West
Virginia hollow, right there in northeast Connecticut.

Strange in that neighborhood...garages with absolutely flat roofs.
Certainly the code wouldn't allow that because of the potential snow loads.

Flat roof can be code compliant.


On light residential frame construction in high snow load areas? Wow...

Sure, as long as it's designed for the load.


Thanks, didn't know that.

On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 10:06:10 AM UTC-4, True North wrote:


What....like the house at

6331 EDINBURGH STREET in HALIFAX NOVA SCOTIA???

Shall I re-post the picture, ****face?