On 9/4/13 8:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 9/3/2013 2:03 PM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 14:13:33 UTC-3, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 9/3/2013 12:21 PM, John H wrote:

On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 06:58:04 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:



There were reports last weekend that Syrian rebels admitted to Dale

Gavlak, a respected middle east correspondent for the Associated Press

and the Public Broadcasting Network, that they (the rebels) were

responsible for the chemical gas attacks on August 21st.



The rebels claim that the chemical weapons were provided by Prince

Bandar bin Sultan (the intelligence chief of Saudi Arabia) and were

the result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling and not

knowing that they were chemical weapons.



The rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to

handle the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears as

though the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the Al-Qaeda

offshoot Jabhat al-Nusra.



ï¿?They didnï¿?t tell us what these arms were or how to use them. We didnï¿?t

know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical

weapons.ï¿?





So, if true, what now?



The administration continues to state the evidence shows it was the Assad folks who employed the

weapons. The UN team was specifically *not* tasked to determine who employed the weapons. I wouldn't

be a bit surprised if this were an al Qaeda ploy to get US involvement.



John (Gun Nut) H.





You do the math.. The only logical reason for Assad to use them would be

to test the world reaction, and having found out we will do nothing, he

would be using them more and more.... After all, he is at war...



If AlQueda used them as a false flag op on their own people which we

know they do, it would be to hope to blame it on Assad, but because of

the scrutiny, they would not be able to continue to use them....



Do the math.. AlQueda did it... False Flag Operation...

Wow... too bad Johnny didn't have your brilliant military mind on his staff 40 years ago.
Things might have gone better for him and his Army.


Does it make you feel cool to dismiss the honorable service to a man's
country? Either way, me and more than half the congress are not too far
from each other on this, only difference is I can come right out and say
it. You, you have nothing to add ever but name calling. I suppose you
don't even realize that with each and every post you say a lot more
about yourself, then you say about me.... LOL!

Do you mean the way you righties dismiss the service of John Kerry?



Herring showed up. Impressive and honorable.

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


Do you mean the way you righties dismiss the service of John Kerry?

-------------------------------

John Kerry created a lot of enemies when he returned from his brief
military service. Many people, including myself, feel his service was
an arranged stint to further enable his political ambitions that he
has harbored since his teen years. He is not generally liked in MA
but has built a political base of support that keeps him being
elected, much like Ted Kennedy did.

I had a personal engagement with him and his office years ago that
further confirmed my belief that his "support" for fellow vets is (or
was) a bunch of bull****.

That all said, I am somewhat impressed so far with his performance as
Secretary of State. I think in 6 months he has grasped and has had
more positive influence in global issues than Hillary accomplished in
four years.

On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:15:33 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 9/4/13 8:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 9/3/2013 2:03 PM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 14:13:33 UTC-3, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 9/3/2013 12:21 PM, John H wrote:

On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 06:58:04 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:



There were reports last weekend that Syrian rebels admitted to Dale

Gavlak, a respected middle east correspondent for the Associated Press

and the Public Broadcasting Network, that they (the rebels) were

responsible for the chemical gas attacks on August 21st.



The rebels claim that the chemical weapons were provided by Prince

Bandar bin Sultan (the intelligence chief of Saudi Arabia) and were

the result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling and not

knowing that they were chemical weapons.



The rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to

handle the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears as

though the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the Al-Qaeda

offshoot Jabhat al-Nusra.



ï¿?They didnï¿?t tell us what these arms were or how to use them. We didnï¿?t

know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical

weapons.ï¿?





So, if true, what now?



The administration continues to state the evidence shows it was the Assad folks who employed the

weapons. The UN team was specifically *not* tasked to determine who employed the weapons. I wouldn't

be a bit surprised if this were an al Qaeda ploy to get US involvement.



John (Gun Nut) H.





You do the math.. The only logical reason for Assad to use them would be

to test the world reaction, and having found out we will do nothing, he

would be using them more and more.... After all, he is at war...



If AlQueda used them as a false flag op on their own people which we

know they do, it would be to hope to blame it on Assad, but because of

the scrutiny, they would not be able to continue to use them....



Do the math.. AlQueda did it... False Flag Operation...

Wow... too bad Johnny didn't have your brilliant military mind on his staff 40 years ago.
Things might have gone better for him and his Army.


Does it make you feel cool to dismiss the honorable service to a man's
country? Either way, me and more than half the congress are not too far
from each other on this, only difference is I can come right out and say
it. You, you have nothing to add ever but name calling. I suppose you
don't even realize that with each and every post you say a lot more
about yourself, then you say about me.... LOL!

Do you mean the way you righties dismiss the service of John Kerry?



Herring showed up. Impressive and honorable.

Thanks, Harry. Your support is appreciated also.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

True North wrote:
In your case it's more like disservice to your country.
Get a real job, pay your back taxes and creditors and then come discuss doing a service to your country.
Harry isn't interested in paying anyone back.

On 9/6/2013 10:17 PM, Earl wrote:
True North wrote:
In your case it's more like disservice to your country.
Get a real job, pay your back taxes and creditors and then come
discuss doing a service to your country.
Harry isn't interested in paying anyone back.

Why is Donnie ragging on Harry? I thought they were joined at the hip.

On Saturday, 7 September 2013 08:46:04 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 9/6/2013 10:17 PM, Earl wrote:

True North wrote:

In your case it's more like disservice to your country.

Get a real job, pay your back taxes and creditors and then come

discuss doing a service to your country.

Harry isn't interested in paying anyone back.



Why is Donnie ragging on Harry? I thought they were joined at the hip.


Ho ho ho!
Please stop... your gems of wit and humour are killing me!

On 9/7/2013 7:46 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 9/6/2013 10:17 PM, Earl wrote:
True North wrote:
In your case it's more like disservice to your country.
Get a real job, pay your back taxes and creditors and then come
discuss doing a service to your country.
Harry isn't interested in paying anyone back.

Why is Donnie ragging on Harry? I thought they were joined at the hip.

He's just ****ing on everybody.. it's ok though until someone ****es
back. don will be ok here until we hit a subject where he knows more
than "the judges" here, (not likely any time soon), once you pull the
curtain back, you have made an enemy of the control freaksss...

In article ,
says...

On 9/7/2013 7:46 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 9/6/2013 10:17 PM, Earl wrote:
True North wrote:
In your case it's more like disservice to your country.
Get a real job, pay your back taxes and creditors and then come
discuss doing a service to your country.
Harry isn't interested in paying anyone back.

Why is Donnie ragging on Harry? I thought they were joined at the hip.

He's just ****ing on everybody.. it's ok though until someone ****es
back. don will be ok here until we hit a subject where he knows more
than "the judges" here, (not likely any time soon), once you pull the
curtain back, you have made an enemy of the control freaksss...

WHAAAAAAA, shut up, little cry baby.

Hank© wrote:
On 9/6/2013 10:17 PM, Earl wrote:
True North wrote:
In your case it's more like disservice to your country.
Get a real job, pay your back taxes and creditors and then come
discuss doing a service to your country.
Harry isn't interested in paying anyone back.

Why is Donnie ragging on Harry? I thought they were joined at the hip.

They are joined in some fashion!

On 9/7/2013 10:20 PM, Earl wrote:
Hank© wrote:
On 9/6/2013 10:17 PM, Earl wrote:
True North wrote:
In your case it's more like disservice to your country.
Get a real job, pay your back taxes and creditors and then come
discuss doing a service to your country.
Harry isn't interested in paying anyone back.

Why is Donnie ragging on Harry? I thought they were joined at the hip.

They are joined in some fashion!

Wink! Got it. A slip joint. ;-)