"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 9/3/13 6:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
There were reports last weekend that Syrian rebels admitted to Dale
Gavlak, a respected middle east correspondent for the Associated
Press
and the Public Broadcasting Network, that they (the rebels) were
responsible for the chemical gas attacks on August 21st.

The rebels claim that the chemical weapons were provided by Prince
Bandar bin Sultan (the intelligence chief of Saudi Arabia) and were
the
result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling and not knowing
that
they were chemical weapons.

The rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to
handle the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears
as
though the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the
Al-Qaeda
offshoot Jabhat al-Nusra.

“They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them. We
didn’t
know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were
chemical
weapons.”


So, if true, what now?




Reports from "Mint Press News..."?

In an exclusive report for Mint Press News, interviews with Syrians in
the location of the chemical attacks seems to point to direct Saudi
involvement in providing the chemical weapons for the attack.

And it doesn't rain in Indianapolis in the summertime...

--------------------------

I don't have a clue who "Mint Press News" is.
The author of the report was attributed as being Dale Gavlak.

You didn't answer the question. So, if true, what now?