"Boating All Out" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"thumper" wrote in message ...

On 8/12/2013 3:09 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The "banksters" didn't cause the recession. I think it would be
more
accurate to call it the "Barney Frank & Co." recession.

You keep making that assertion. I'd like to see you document and
quantify it. I think your proportion is off by an order of
magnitude
or
so. Show good accounting and I'll accept it.

----------------------------------

From various published sources:


It's really meaningless posting partisan scribblings.

I prefer facts and graphs showing facts.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...y-frank-didnt-
cause-the-housing-crisis/2011/11/28/gIQANqLH5N_blog.html

Perhaps you have actual facts showing the private market role in the
"sub-prime crisis" was not as depicted in the above link.
Probably not.

Finding a scapegoat and laying all the blame on the scapegoat is not
the
mark of a reasonable person.

There are many reasons to consider Franks a certain form of scum.
But to use him as a scapegoat to exonerate all the other the real
"culprits" reeks of a mindless partisanship.
And yet you continue.
It doesn't work.

--------------------------------

Holy Crap. You post a link to someone's opinion blog giving his
opinions and think his take is entirely accurate? In fact, the bulk
of what he wrote supports my argument.

It didn't start in 2003 through 2008 where this guy focuses his
attention. By then Frank was starting to cover his tracks. It
started back in 1992, and Frank was in the midst of it all.