Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/12/13 8:43 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:48:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/12/13 5:30 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:26:45 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/12/13 4:25 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:03:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What is cruel or unusual about executing someone? Why is him being "deranged" a factor? It sounds like the perfect candidate. Whoosh. Exactly, flush that scum out of the gene pool. In civilized countries, capital punishment is a thing of the past. In the backwards states of the United States, it exists to give conservatrash a woody. Those countries don't have nearly the number of crimes that would draw a death penalty or the alternative, life without parole. At a certain point we are going to have to face the reality of thousands of geriatric prisoners demanding nursing home care, in custody. That $40,000 we have been paying to keep them alive will skyrocket into 6 figures (at a time when we may not even be able to give that care to productive people) These are not the people who have worked and produced economic value for the country. They are usually life time criminals who have been an economic drag on us since the day they were born. I don't have a problem killing them. We can use a drone if that eases your conscience. It seems to OK to kill anyone with a drone if we think they constitute a threat... The only problem I have is being sure you really have the right guy. If it is someone like the Aurora shooter or The Fort Hood guy, we know they did it ... spark them up. As I stated, we are pretty much the only modern western nation that still has the death penalty, and, of course, we have more crimes on the books than other countries, and the largest percentage of population in prison. You're a pretty bloodthirsty guy. Sorry to see that. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/12/13 8:43 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:48:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/12/13 5:30 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:26:45 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/12/13 4:25 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:03:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What is cruel or unusual about executing someone? Why is him being "deranged" a factor? It sounds like the perfect candidate. Whoosh. Exactly, flush that scum out of the gene pool. In civilized countries, capital punishment is a thing of the past. In the backwards states of the United States, it exists to give conservatrash a woody. Those countries don't have nearly the number of crimes that would draw a death penalty or the alternative, life without parole. At a certain point we are going to have to face the reality of thousands of geriatric prisoners demanding nursing home care, in custody. That $40,000 we have been paying to keep them alive will skyrocket into 6 figures (at a time when we may not even be able to give that care to productive people) These are not the people who have worked and produced economic value for the country. They are usually life time criminals who have been an economic drag on us since the day they were born. I don't have a problem killing them. We can use a drone if that eases your conscience. It seems to OK to kill anyone with a drone if we think they constitute a threat... The only problem I have is being sure you really have the right guy. If it is someone like the Aurora shooter or The Fort Hood guy, we know they did it ... spark them up. As I stated, we are pretty much the only modern western nation that still has the death penalty, and, of course, we have more crimes on the books than other countries, and the largest percentage of population in prison. You're a pretty bloodthirsty guy. Sorry to see that. Other countries may not need the death penalty. Their long term prisoners kill themselves. Japan has their prisoners in the cell 23 hours a day, and no talking to other prisoners. Most European countries probably do not have TV, Internet, and social programs for their inmates. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/13/2013 6:19 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/13/13 2:01 AM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:55:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: As I stated, we are pretty much the only modern western nation that still has the death penalty, and, of course, we have more crimes on the books than other countries, and the largest percentage of population in prison. You're a pretty bloodthirsty guy. Sorry to see that. So are our criminals. If you threw out every nonviolent theft, drug and financial crime we would still have more murderers, kidnappers and rapist in jail than those other countries. Are you really defending James Holmes, Ariel Castro and Maj Nidal Hasan? Give me one good reason why we should spend millions of dollars keeping them alive. Do you think any of them might be innocent? I find it interesting that the same guy who won't let us kill slimeballs like that will still support a drone strike that kills everyone in the building, guilty or innocent. I'm not defending the violent criminals who are or should be locked up. I'm simply consistent in my opposition to the death penalty. You were accused of supporting drone strikes. Does you or doesn't you? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gosh... | General | |||
Oh my Gosh | General | |||
Oh My Gosh... | General | |||
The shares should easliy be worth $100+ within a year.... | Cruising |