BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   So, can he shoot your daughter? (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/157746-so-can-he-shoot-your-daughter.html)

Eisboch[_9_] July 24th 13 02:30 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


"Common sense" would have had Zimmerman staying in his car and wait
for
the police, like the dispatcher suggested, and like the police's
representative told them at the neighborhood watch meeting, and like
the
pamphlets handed out also stated.

----------------------------------------

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do
that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car,
according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal
and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened
Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.



F.O.A.D. July 24th 13 02:32 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


"Common sense" would have had Zimmerman staying in his car and wait for
the police, like the dispatcher suggested, and like the police's
representative told them at the neighborhood watch meeting, and like the
pamphlets handed out also stated.

----------------------------------------

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car, according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

Eisboch[_9_] July 24th 13 03:08 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------

Sorry. I forgot that earlier this month you postulated the theory
that Zimmerman's wounds were self-inflicted, ostensibly to mask his
vigilante style scheme to stalk, attack and shoot a black male in his
neighborhood because of his racist hatred of blacks in general. I
suppose the protest he organized a year prior in support of the black
homeless guy mistreated by the police and his tutoring of young black
kids was all part of this master plan to get away with murder when the
opportunity presented itself. He must have also convinced his gym
trainer not to significantly improve his fighting skills and offered
help to neighbors whose houses were broken into ... all part of a
masterful, well conceived plot.

More information is becoming available to the public regarding the
backgrounds and character profiles of both Zimmerman and Martin. Of
course there are those who will never acknowledge that maybe they were
wrong in their judgments, but the truth will eventually become
unavoidable.

Zimmerman broke no laws. He was getting the crap beaten out of him
and feared for his life. Under self-defense laws he was justified in
using deadly force, a conclusion that the jury also found to be
appropriate.


iBoaterer[_3_] July 24th 13 03:08 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


"Common sense" would have had Zimmerman staying in his car and wait
for
the police, like the dispatcher suggested, and like the police's
representative told them at the neighborhood watch meeting, and like
the
pamphlets handed out also stated.

----------------------------------------

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do
that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car,
according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal
and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened
Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


Wait a second, a scratch or a wound or whatever on Zimmerman's nose
concludes somehow that Martin STARTED the altercation? How so?


F.O.A.D. July 24th 13 03:11 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------

Sorry. I forgot that earlier this month you postulated the theory that
Zimmerman's wounds were self-inflicted, ostensibly to mask his vigilante
style scheme to stalk, attack and shoot a black male in his neighborhood
because of his racist hatred of blacks in general. I suppose the
protest he organized a year prior in support of the black homeless guy
mistreated by the police and his tutoring of young black kids was all
part of this master plan to get away with murder when the opportunity
presented itself. He must have also convinced his gym trainer not to
significantly improve his fighting skills and offered help to neighbors
whose houses were broken into ... all part of a masterful, well
conceived plot.

More information is becoming available to the public regarding the
backgrounds and character profiles of both Zimmerman and Martin. Of
course there are those who will never acknowledge that maybe they were
wrong in their judgments, but the truth will eventually become unavoidable.

Zimmerman broke no laws. He was getting the crap beaten out of him and
feared for his life. Under self-defense laws he was justified in using
deadly force, a conclusion that the jury also found to be appropriate.



Your comment postulated that Zimmerman's nose injury indicated Martin
started the fight. There's nothing on which to base that. Zimmerman
might well have punched Martin first, and Martin then might have punched
Zimmerman in the nose.



F.O.A.D. July 24th 13 03:15 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


"Common sense" would have had Zimmerman staying in his car and wait
for
the police, like the dispatcher suggested, and like the police's
representative told them at the neighborhood watch meeting, and like
the
pamphlets handed out also stated.

----------------------------------------

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do
that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car,
according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal
and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened
Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


Wait a second, a scratch or a wound or whatever on Zimmerman's nose
concludes somehow that Martin STARTED the altercation? How so?


It doesn't.

iBoaterer[_3_] July 24th 13 04:49 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:14:55 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:41:35 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Yeah, he didn't say "black kid." BFD. He saw a kid walking through the
neighborhood, the kid was black, and Zimmerman therefore thought he was
about to commit a crime.

He was a stranger INSIDE the fence of a gated community. This was not
a public street.


Then what were the police doing there, they would have no jurisdiction.


Why do you think the police have no "jurisdiction" on private
property?


If an invited guest of a homeowner doesn't have the right to be there,
neither would a cop.

iBoaterer[_3_] July 24th 13 04:51 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:14:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car, according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.


His girlfriend even thinks Martin hit Zimmerman first and she was the
closest thing to a witness the state had.,


Incredible!!!! Ripped apart about everything she said that was pro-
Martin, but anything she said that might be construed as helping
Zimmerman is exactly correct and to the point.....

JustWaitAFrekinMinute July 24th 13 05:01 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/2013 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:14:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car, according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.


His girlfriend even thinks Martin hit Zimmerman first and she was the
closest thing to a witness the state had.,


That "theory" came to light right before the trial. That "theory" had
never been discussed or mentioned by that witness until she had to
testify in court and of course being no evidence at all to back up her
theory, it was shot down quickly by the defense. The jury could see a
young girl trying to help her friends and do what Sharpton and all told
her to do..

Hank©[_3_] July 24th 13 05:28 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/2013 10:11 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------

Sorry. I forgot that earlier this month you postulated the theory that
Zimmerman's wounds were self-inflicted, ostensibly to mask his vigilante
style scheme to stalk, attack and shoot a black male in his neighborhood
because of his racist hatred of blacks in general. I suppose the
protest he organized a year prior in support of the black homeless guy
mistreated by the police and his tutoring of young black kids was all
part of this master plan to get away with murder when the opportunity
presented itself. He must have also convinced his gym trainer not to
significantly improve his fighting skills and offered help to neighbors
whose houses were broken into ... all part of a masterful, well
conceived plot.

More information is becoming available to the public regarding the
backgrounds and character profiles of both Zimmerman and Martin. Of
course there are those who will never acknowledge that maybe they were
wrong in their judgments, but the truth will eventually become
unavoidable.

Zimmerman broke no laws. He was getting the crap beaten out of him and
feared for his life. Under self-defense laws he was justified in using
deadly force, a conclusion that the jury also found to be appropriate.



Your comment postulated that Zimmerman's nose injury indicated Martin
started the fight. There's nothing on which to base that. Zimmerman
might well have punched Martin first, and Martin then might have punched
Zimmerman in the nose.


What would he have punched martin with? The back of his head, or his nose?

Hank©[_3_] July 24th 13 05:32 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/2013 10:15 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


"Common sense" would have had Zimmerman staying in his car and wait
for
the police, like the dispatcher suggested, and like the police's
representative told them at the neighborhood watch meeting, and like
the
pamphlets handed out also stated.

----------------------------------------

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do
that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car,
according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal
and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened
Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


Wait a second, a scratch or a wound or whatever on Zimmerman's nose
concludes somehow that Martin STARTED the altercation? How so?


It doesn't.

martin only had bruised hands and that round hole in his chest. Zimm
only had cuts on his head and a broken nose. He had no defensive wounds.

JustWaitAFrekinMinute July 24th 13 05:35 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/2013 12:32 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/24/2013 10:15 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


"Common sense" would have had Zimmerman staying in his car and wait
for
the police, like the dispatcher suggested, and like the police's
representative told them at the neighborhood watch meeting, and like
the
pamphlets handed out also stated.

----------------------------------------

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do
that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car,
according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal
and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened
Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.

Wait a second, a scratch or a wound or whatever on Zimmerman's nose
concludes somehow that Martin STARTED the altercation? How so?


It doesn't.


And nobody said it did, well, but you and kevin..

martin only had bruised hands and that round hole in his chest. Zimm
only had cuts on his head and a broken nose. He had no defensive wounds.



F.O.A.D. July 24th 13 05:40 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/13 12:35 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/24/2013 12:32 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/24/2013 10:15 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


"Common sense" would have had Zimmerman staying in his car and wait
for
the police, like the dispatcher suggested, and like the police's
representative told them at the neighborhood watch meeting, and like
the
pamphlets handed out also stated.

----------------------------------------

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do
that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car,
according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal
and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened
Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.

Wait a second, a scratch or a wound or whatever on Zimmerman's nose
concludes somehow that Martin STARTED the altercation? How so?


It doesn't.


And nobody said it did, well, but you and kevin..

martin only had bruised hands and that round hole in his chest. Zimm
only had cuts on his head and a broken nose. He had no defensive wounds.



Read much, psychomoron?

iBoaterer[_3_] July 24th 13 06:09 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:51:12 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:14:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:





There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

His girlfriend even thinks Martin hit Zimmerman first and she was the
closest thing to a witness the state had.,


Incredible!!!! Ripped apart about everything she said that was pro-
Martin, but anything she said that might be construed as helping
Zimmerman is exactly correct and to the point.....


Cite


Um, okay, YOU said "His girlfriend even thinks Martin hit Zimmerman
first".......SHeesh...

iBoaterer[_3_] July 24th 13 06:11 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:49:40 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:14:55 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:41:35 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Yeah, he didn't say "black kid." BFD. He saw a kid walking through the
neighborhood, the kid was black, and Zimmerman therefore thought he was
about to commit a crime.

He was a stranger INSIDE the fence of a gated community. This was not
a public street.

Then what were the police doing there, they would have no jurisdiction.

Why do you think the police have no "jurisdiction" on private
property?


If an invited guest of a homeowner doesn't have the right to be there,
neither would a cop.


If the cop was not in uniform, they have a right to ask him for an ID
too. It is also not unreasonable to ask him why he was there. That was
the last question asked by Zimmerman before Martin hit him (again
according to the STATE'S witness).


Come up behind me at night in the rain and start messing with me and see
if I just cower and wait for what could possibly be a person wanting to
do me harm....

iBoaterer[_3_] July 24th 13 06:12 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

On 7/24/2013 11:43 AM,
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:14:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car, according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.


His girlfriend even thinks Martin hit Zimmerman first and she was the
closest thing to a witness the state had.,


That "theory" came to light right before the trial. That "theory" had
never been discussed or mentioned by that witness until she had to
testify in court and of course being no evidence at all to back up her
theory, it was shot down quickly by the defense. The jury could see a
young girl trying to help her friends and do what Sharpton and all told
her to do..


What "theory"?

Eisboch[_9_] July 24th 13 06:13 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------


Your comment postulated that Zimmerman's nose injury indicated Martin
started the fight. There's nothing on which to base that. Zimmerman
might well have punched Martin first, and Martin then might have
punched
Zimmerman in the nose.

------------------------------------

Testimony in the trial suggests that it is unlikely that Zimmerman
threw *any* punches period. If he was the racist vigilante that you
like to promote, why throw a fist if you have a 9mm handgun strapped
to your belt?

In the end it doesn't matter who threw the first punch. The upheld
self defense claim has nothing to do with who threw the first punch,
who followed who or what anyone said to the other.



iBoaterer[_3_] July 24th 13 06:14 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

On 7/24/2013 12:32 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/24/2013 10:15 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


"Common sense" would have had Zimmerman staying in his car and wait
for
the police, like the dispatcher suggested, and like the police's
representative told them at the neighborhood watch meeting, and like
the
pamphlets handed out also stated.

----------------------------------------

I agree with you .... except for the part about the dispatcher
"suggesting" that he stay in his car. That didn't happen.
Zimmerman was already out of his car, prompted by the dispatcher's
question, "Where is he"? When told "we don't need you to do
that",
Zimmerman replied "Ok" and attempted to return to his car,
according to
his account.

The rest I agree with. Only thing is, nothing he did was illegal
and
there's nothing to suggest that Zimmerman physically threatened
Martin
or attacked him . If you and others have concluded in your
imaginations that he did, so be it but there is absolutely zero
evidence of that.




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.

Wait a second, a scratch or a wound or whatever on Zimmerman's nose
concludes somehow that Martin STARTED the altercation? How so?


It doesn't.


And nobody said it did, well, but you and kevin..

martin only had bruised hands and that round hole in his chest. Zimm
only had cuts on his head and a broken nose. He had no defensive wounds.


Oh, ****, moron, WTF do you think this answer to this statement says??


Harry stated:
There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

To which Eisboch replied:
Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.

F.O.A.D. July 24th 13 06:21 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/13 1:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:49:40 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:14:55 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:41:35 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Yeah, he didn't say "black kid." BFD. He saw a kid walking through the
neighborhood, the kid was black, and Zimmerman therefore thought he was
about to commit a crime.

He was a stranger INSIDE the fence of a gated community. This was not
a public street.

Then what were the police doing there, they would have no jurisdiction.

Why do you think the police have no "jurisdiction" on private
property?

If an invited guest of a homeowner doesn't have the right to be there,
neither would a cop.


If the cop was not in uniform, they have a right to ask him for an ID
too. It is also not unreasonable to ask him why he was there. That was
the last question asked by Zimmerman before Martin hit him (again
according to the STATE'S witness).


Come up behind me at night in the rain and start messing with me and see
if I just cower and wait for what could possibly be a person wanting to
do me harm....


Don't do it in redneck, florida. You'll get shot by an asshole standing
his ground.

F.O.A.D. July 24th 13 06:22 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On 7/24/13 1:13 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------


Your comment postulated that Zimmerman's nose injury indicated Martin
started the fight. There's nothing on which to base that. Zimmerman
might well have punched Martin first, and Martin then might have punched
Zimmerman in the nose.

------------------------------------

Testimony in the trial suggests that it is unlikely that Zimmerman
threw *any* punches period. If he was the racist vigilante that you
like to promote, why throw a fist if you have a 9mm handgun strapped to
your belt?

In the end it doesn't matter who threw the first punch. The upheld self
defense claim has nothing to do with who threw the first punch, who
followed who or what anyone said to the other.



There were no witnesses, so I'm not sure what "testimony" would have
been valid. Obviously the lesson here is that if you want to kill
someone, make sure there are no witnesses.

Boating All Out July 24th 13 09:19 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article
,
says...

Zimmerman broke no laws. He was getting the crap beaten out of him
and feared for his life. Under self-defense laws he was justified in
using deadly force, a conclusion that the jury also found to be
appropriate.


I see this continues.
Might be easier to just say "No, he didn't."
The other side then can say "Yes,he did."
More efficient.




iBoaterer[_3_] July 25th 13 03:41 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:11:34 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:49:40 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:14:55 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:41:35 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Yeah, he didn't say "black kid." BFD. He saw a kid walking through the
neighborhood, the kid was black, and Zimmerman therefore thought he was
about to commit a crime.

He was a stranger INSIDE the fence of a gated community. This was not
a public street.

Then what were the police doing there, they would have no jurisdiction.

Why do you think the police have no "jurisdiction" on private
property?

If an invited guest of a homeowner doesn't have the right to be there,
neither would a cop.

If the cop was not in uniform, they have a right to ask him for an ID
too. It is also not unreasonable to ask him why he was there. That was
the last question asked by Zimmerman before Martin hit him (again
according to the STATE'S witness).


Come up behind me at night in the rain and start messing with me and see
if I just cower and wait for what could possibly be a person wanting to
do me harm....


So if someone is looking at you funny you attack them?


I'm sorry, where did I say that?




iBoaterer[_3_] July 25th 13 04:53 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:41:49 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:11:34 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:


If the cop was not in uniform, they have a right to ask him for an ID
too. It is also not unreasonable to ask him why he was there. That was
the last question asked by Zimmerman before Martin hit him (again
according to the STATE'S witness).

Come up behind me at night in the rain and start messing with me and see
if I just cower and wait for what could possibly be a person wanting to
do me harm....

So if someone is looking at you funny you attack them?


I'm sorry, where did I say that?



That is all the state ever alleged that Zimmerman ever did. He
followed and tried to WATCH Martin.
Everything else is just in your mind.


So because of that you know that to be true? OJ was found innocent as
well, you know.

Earl[_91_] July 28th 13 03:42 AM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
True North wrote:
I still say the 'merican gov't should take handguns out of the hands of Americans.
Too many just can't be trusted with them.

It's working great in Chicago, eh?

John H[_2_] July 28th 13 02:42 PM

So, can he shoot your daughter?
 
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:42:16 -0400, Earl wrote:

True North wrote:
I still say the 'merican gov't should take handguns out of the hands of Americans.
Too many just can't be trusted with them.

It's working great in Chicago, eh?


And DC.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com