| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/19/13 11:29 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Probably was herring, flajim and snotty. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court. This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86 But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be surprised. I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/19/2013 12:43 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court. This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86 But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be surprised. I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man. Is he eviler than you? I'm guessing you would say yes since he doesn'f follow your Pied Piper. Pssssst! You'll drown too if you don't step out of line. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 16:43:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court. This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86 But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be surprised. I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man. So was LBJ and they name government buildings after him. So what is your point? |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/19/13 4:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:09:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/19/13 4:01 PM, wrote: On 19 Jul 2013 19:44:08 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: wrote: On 19 Jul 2013 16:43:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man. So was LBJ and they name government buildings after him. So what is your point? What is your singular obsession with Cheney when we have had so many politicians making bad decisions that killed millions of people? Cheney is a criminal who should have been prosecuted. He wasn't. Why are you so upset over a magazine cover that shows the Boston bomber, who is far lesser of a criminal than Cheney, who appeared on many magazine covers? Cheney is a politician who made policy decisions you don't agree with but congress did. The other guy is a terrorist A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/19/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:44:25 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court. This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86 But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be surprised. I'm sorry, just what do you links and banter about people in Oakland have to do with the graffiti that I posted and who might have done it? You think graffiti rises to the level of arson, theft and general mayhem? How about all the death threats Z has had? I know, you think he should be murdered too. I doubt iLoogy wants Zimmerman murdered. I don't, either, but I think it would be appropriate for him to face the same situation he forced on Martin, with the other guy armed, too. In at least part of the Old West, if you confronted an unarmed man on the street and ended up shooting him, the townfolk would string you up. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/19/13 5:32 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/19/2013 4:01 PM, wrote: On 19 Jul 2013 19:44:08 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: wrote: On 19 Jul 2013 16:43:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man. So was LBJ and they name government buildings after him. So what is your point? What is your singular obsession with Cheney when we have had so many politicians making bad decisions that killed millions of people? Our current POTUS gave up decades of work, blood, and treasure in the Middle East to the Muslim Brotherhood... I guess Harry supports them too. Say what? Are you saying you supported the Middle East Muslim dictatorships in Egypt and Libya, the dictatorships that repressed and murdered their own people? I realize you righties are big fans of dictatorships that purportedly support our foreign policy agenda, but, sooner or later, the people in those countries revolt and if we are too closely tied to the overthrown dictators, we then have enemies in those countries. If you need examples, consider Cuba, Iran, Vietnam, Chile, Panama, El Salvador. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
In article ,
says... On 7/19/13 3:33 PM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:44:25 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court. This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86 But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be surprised. I'm sorry, just what do you links and banter about people in Oakland have to do with the graffiti that I posted and who might have done it? You think graffiti rises to the level of arson, theft and general mayhem? How about all the death threats Z has had? I know, you think he should be murdered too. I doubt iLoogy wants Zimmerman murdered. I don't, either, but I think it would be appropriate for him to face the same situation he forced on Martin, with the other guy armed, too. Please. You said "I think." Do you often have these kinds of "thoughts?" It's nonsense. Just don't say "I think." It's not "you." Leave that to others. You take care of the thoughtless insult side of the business, okay? You do mediocre job of that, which is enough here. I'll explain in the most simple terms. It's very doubtful you can train Zimmerman to be a thug, so if the "other guy" was a Martin clone, he would just shoot Zimmerman dead before Zimmerman even thought to pull out his gun. That may be exactly what you want. Murder. Is that what "you think?" Or was it more like an idea of the two slowly walking down a dusty street toward one another at high noon, waiting for the first one to draw his Colt. Is that really the vision dancing around barely suppressed in your little noggin? Hard to say, given how you "think." If you want high-schoolers like Martin armed, get the laws changed so they can carry too. Maybe a Martin and a Zimmerman could fatally shoot each other. You appear to be a real fan of violence, so I guess that would be the absolute best outcome for you. A gunfight to the death of both. In at least part of the Old West, if you confronted an unarmed man on the street and ended up shooting him, the townfolk would string you up. Yes, you've already been clear enough about your preference for lynch mob "law" when it suits your bigotry. But that's not how the law is right now. Really, it's 2013, not 1875. I'm afraid you're out of luck. Now, now, don't be seeing red. You'll get over it. Tomorrow is a new day. Maybe a good day to renew your carry permit. Never know when you'll run into an ultimate bad-ass like Georgie Zimmerman. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/19/13 6:53 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 7/19/13 3:33 PM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:44:25 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court. This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86 But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be surprised. I'm sorry, just what do you links and banter about people in Oakland have to do with the graffiti that I posted and who might have done it? You think graffiti rises to the level of arson, theft and general mayhem? How about all the death threats Z has had? I know, you think he should be murdered too. I doubt iLoogy wants Zimmerman murdered. I don't, either, but I think it would be appropriate for him to face the same situation he forced on Martin, with the other guy armed, too. Please. You said "I think." Do you often have these kinds of "thoughts?" It's nonsense. Just don't say "I think." It's not "you." Leave that to others. You take care of the thoughtless insult side of the business, okay? You do mediocre job of that, which is enough here. I'll explain in the most simple terms. It's very doubtful you can train Zimmerman to be a thug, so if the "other guy" was a Martin clone, he would just shoot Zimmerman dead before Zimmerman even thought to pull out his gun. That may be exactly what you want. Murder. Is that what "you think?" Or was it more like an idea of the two slowly walking down a dusty street toward one another at high noon, waiting for the first one to draw his Colt. Is that really the vision dancing around barely suppressed in your little noggin? Hard to say, given how you "think." If you want high-schoolers like Martin armed, get the laws changed so they can carry too. Maybe a Martin and a Zimmerman could fatally shoot each other. You appear to be a real fan of violence, so I guess that would be the absolute best outcome for you. A gunfight to the death of both. In at least part of the Old West, if you confronted an unarmed man on the street and ended up shooting him, the townfolk would string you up. Yes, you've already been clear enough about your preference for lynch mob "law" when it suits your bigotry. But that's not how the law is right now. Really, it's 2013, not 1875. I'm afraid you're out of luck. Now, now, don't be seeing red. You'll get over it. Tomorrow is a new day. Maybe a good day to renew your carry permit. Never know when you'll run into an ultimate bad-ass like Georgie Zimmerman. What a gasbag you are. Sheesh. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/19/2013 8:25 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/19/13 6:53 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 7/19/13 3:33 PM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:44:25 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court. This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86 But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be surprised. I'm sorry, just what do you links and banter about people in Oakland have to do with the graffiti that I posted and who might have done it? You think graffiti rises to the level of arson, theft and general mayhem? How about all the death threats Z has had? I know, you think he should be murdered too. I doubt iLoogy wants Zimmerman murdered. I don't, either, but I think it would be appropriate for him to face the same situation he forced on Martin, with the other guy armed, too. Please. You said "I think." Do you often have these kinds of "thoughts?" It's nonsense. Just don't say "I think." It's not "you." Leave that to others. You take care of the thoughtless insult side of the business, okay? You do mediocre job of that, which is enough here. I'll explain in the most simple terms. It's very doubtful you can train Zimmerman to be a thug, so if the "other guy" was a Martin clone, he would just shoot Zimmerman dead before Zimmerman even thought to pull out his gun. That may be exactly what you want. Murder. Is that what "you think?" Or was it more like an idea of the two slowly walking down a dusty street toward one another at high noon, waiting for the first one to draw his Colt. Is that really the vision dancing around barely suppressed in your little noggin? Hard to say, given how you "think." If you want high-schoolers like Martin armed, get the laws changed so they can carry too. Maybe a Martin and a Zimmerman could fatally shoot each other. You appear to be a real fan of violence, so I guess that would be the absolute best outcome for you. A gunfight to the death of both. In at least part of the Old West, if you confronted an unarmed man on the street and ended up shooting him, the townfolk would string you up. Yes, you've already been clear enough about your preference for lynch mob "law" when it suits your bigotry. But that's not how the law is right now. Really, it's 2013, not 1875. I'm afraid you're out of luck. Now, now, don't be seeing red. You'll get over it. Tomorrow is a new day. Maybe a good day to renew your carry permit. Never know when you'll run into an ultimate bad-ass like Georgie Zimmerman. What a gasbag you are. Sheesh. After studying boating all out's post for 1 1/2 hours, this is the best you can come up with for a reply? Oh my. You really have lost it. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/19/13 11:29 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4 Probably was herring, flajim and snotty. Sure. That's it, deadbeat. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
In article ,
says... On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:28:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/19/13 3:33 PM, wrote: I doubt iLoogy wants Zimmerman murdered. I don't, either, but I think it would be appropriate for him to face the same situation he forced on Martin, with the other guy armed, too. In at least part of the Old West, if you confronted an unarmed man on the street and ended up shooting him, the townfolk would string you up. You are leaping to the conclusion that Zimmerman, somehow confronted Martin when even the girlfriend admits Martin probably threw the first punch. You DO realize, don't you, that just because Martin might have thrown the first punch, doesn't mean that Zimmerman didn't "confront" Martin, right? A lot of talk was raised about a depraved mind. In the moments before the shooting, Martin was on top of and had complete control over Zimmerman, Zimmerman not accomplishing any effective defensive measures and was crying like a little girl yet Martin kept beating on him. At that moment, who had the depraved mind? Who was in mortal fear? That is the definition of self defense. Yes, Martin was self defending himself, true enough. USA today made the statement "If Zimmerman did not have a gun, Martin would be alive". The question is, would Zimmerman be dead? No, Zimmerman wouldn't have ever confronted Martin, he'd have done what the cops always say to do, what the police liaison told them to do, and what the literature told them to do, wait for the cops. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
In article ,
says... On 7/19/2013 4:01 PM, wrote: On 19 Jul 2013 19:44:08 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: wrote: On 19 Jul 2013 16:43:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man. So was LBJ and they name government buildings after him. So what is your point? What is your singular obsession with Cheney when we have had so many politicians making bad decisions that killed millions of people? Our current POTUS gave up decades of work, blood, and treasure in the Middle East to the Muslim Brotherhood... I guess Harry supports them too. Man, that jawbone must be giving you fits today, that's about as insane as you get..... |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. How many children have been killed and maimed in Chicago since the start of Jessi Jackson's war? |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. FDR, Truman and Churchill did not lie us into WW II. Cheney and his neocon crowd lied us into wars with Iraq and Afghanistan. And please, let's not have that unfrosted yellowcake again, eh? It was all bull**** so the Bush Admin could say it had a serious response to 9-11. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/13 11:38 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. How many children have been killed and maimed in Chicago since the start of Jessi Jackson's war? What war is that, Mr. Smashed Jawbone at 12? |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. What I find sick is that someone could look at all of these instances and see them differently, based on politics alone... This is world affairs and even more, real peoples lives. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/13 11:50 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. What I find sick is that someone could look at all of these instances and see them differently, based on politics alone... This is world affairs and even more, real peoples lives. See what differently? Clinton didn't lie us into ground wars with Iraq and Afghanistan, and his getting us involved in settling the Bosnian war was an entirely different situation. You righties keep glossing over the fact that the Bush-Cheney administration cooked the intel and lied us into wars with Iraq and Afghanistan. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
In article ,
says... On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. How many children have been killed and maimed in Chicago since the start of Jessi Jackson's war? WHAT the **** is "Jessi Jackson's war?" That jawbone giving you trouble again today? |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
In article ,
says... On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:46:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:34 AM, wrote: In the moments before the shooting, Martin was on top of and had complete control over Zimmerman, Zimmerman not accomplishing any effective defensive measures and was crying like a little girl yet Martin kept beating on him. Wow, that must be what Fox was presenting, eh? That is what the prosecution admitted was the likely scenario. cite? |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/13 12:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. How many children have been killed and maimed in Chicago since the start of Jessi Jackson's war? WHAT the **** is "Jessi Jackson's war?" That jawbone giving you trouble again today? Actually, it is *Jesse* Jackson, not *Jessi* Jackson. I think Jessi is a shortened version of Jessica. Snotty is confused about genders...what a surprise. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/2013 12:12 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/20/13 12:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. How many children have been killed and maimed in Chicago since the start of Jessi Jackson's war? WHAT the **** is "Jessi Jackson's war?" That jawbone giving you trouble again today? Actually, it is *Jesse* Jackson, not *Jessi* Jackson. I think Jessi is a shortened version of Jessica. Snotty is confused about genders...what a surprise. Jesse Jackson-Jesse James I think I can remember it now. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/2013 12:46 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/20/2013 12:12 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 7/20/13 12:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. How many children have been killed and maimed in Chicago since the start of Jessi Jackson's war? WHAT the **** is "Jessi Jackson's war?" That jawbone giving you trouble again today? Actually, it is *Jesse* Jackson, not *Jessi* Jackson. I think Jessi is a shortened version of Jessica. Snotty is confused about genders...what a surprise. Jesse Jackson-Jesse James I think I can remember it now. He didn't want to answer the question... no problem... |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/13 12:21 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 11:39:24 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 11:32 AM, wrote: e. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. FDR, Truman and Churchill did not lie us into WW II. There were plenty of lies in the run up to WWII. Yeah, we attacked ourselves in Pearl Harbor and ran our blitzkriegs in Europe. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
|
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/13 1:00 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/20/2013 12:46 PM, Hank© wrote: On 7/20/2013 12:12 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 7/20/13 12:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/20/2013 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. How many children have been killed and maimed in Chicago since the start of Jessi Jackson's war? WHAT the **** is "Jessi Jackson's war?" That jawbone giving you trouble again today? Actually, it is *Jesse* Jackson, not *Jessi* Jackson. I think Jessi is a shortened version of Jessica. Snotty is confused about genders...what a surprise. Jesse Jackson-Jesse James I think I can remember it now. He didn't want to answer the question... no problem... Your insane question? Are we supposed to respond to your paranoia? |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 7/20/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. FDR, Truman and Churchill did not lie us into WW II. Cheney and his neocon crowd lied us into wars with Iraq and Afghanistan. And please, let's not have that unfrosted yellowcake again, eh? It was all bull**** so the Bush Admin could say it had a serious response to 9-11. FDR sure the hell put us in that war. Plotted exactly correctly to get us involved. There is still great evidence that his administration lied about the Japanese fleet and Pearl Harbor! |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 7/20/13 12:21 PM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 11:39:24 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 11:32 AM, wrote: e. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. FDR, Truman and Churchill did not lie us into WW II. There were plenty of lies in the run up to WWII. Yeah, we attacked ourselves in Pearl Harbor and ran our blitzkriegs in Europe. Japan was forced in to war with the USA. We embargoed all oil from them. They were already in a nasty war in China, but FDR forced them to war with us. We violated lots of the neutrality rules in helping Europe/Russia. |
I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
On 7/20/13 2:55 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:45:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 1:24 AM, wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:19:05 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist. By that definition the biggest terrorists in history are FDR, Truman and Winston Churchill. We talk a lot about the nukes but daytime fire bombing of cities killed far more civilians. Nice try defending CheneySlime. Thanks, It is accurate ... or do you think we didn't kill millions of civilians in the "good war". I am not really defending Cheney, only pointing out he did what we do when we engage in wars. How many civilians do you figure we killed when we were enforcing Clinton's "no fly zones". The Iraqis say it approached 50,000, we say it was 10% of that, still a big number. FDR, Truman and Churchill did not lie us into WW II. Cheney and his neocon crowd lied us into wars with Iraq and Afghanistan. And please, let's not have that unfrosted yellowcake again, eh? It was all bull**** so the Bush Admin could say it had a serious response to 9-11. FDR sure the hell put us in that war. Plotted exactly correctly to get us involved. There is still great evidence that his administration lied about the Japanese fleet and Pearl Harbor! Sure, Bill. FDR lied because he knew if it did, the Japanese would attack Pearl Harbor and we'd declare war against the Japanese. And Pearl Harbor wasn't really attacked, right...FDR lied about that, right? Today's funny. Thanks. The precursors to WW II were Italy's invasion of Ethiopia in about 1935, followed by Germany and Italy's efforts to topple the Spanish republic, the Japanese invasion of China, the Soviet Union and Mongolia, and Germany's war against European nations. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor to keep us from interfering with its empire plans for the Pacific. The fact that the Japanese attacked while negotiations were underway with the United States is something you FDR haters cannot deny. Your right-wing view of history is precisely why home schooling on such subjects should not be allowed. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com