http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg

On 7/17/2013 5:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:

http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg

Rolling Stone is not what it started out to be. It's not even about the
Artists and Music anymore, it's about celebrity and social gossip...

On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:07:55 PM UTC-5, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 7/17/2013 5:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:



http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg



Rolling Stone is not what it started out to be. It's not even about the

Artists and Music anymore, it's about celebrity and social gossip...

Like MTV?

On 7/17/2013 6:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:07:55 PM UTC-5, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 7/17/2013 5:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:



http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg



Rolling Stone is not what it started out to be. It's not even about the

Artists and Music anymore, it's about celebrity and social gossip...

Like MTV?


I watched MTV for about two weeks in Florida in 82' haven't bothered
with it since...

On 7/17/13 6:07 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/17/2013 5:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:

http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg


Rolling Stone is not what it started out to be. It's not even about the
Artists and Music anymore, it's about celebrity and social gossip...

There's plenty of coverage of artists and music in Rolling Stone. It was
never completely about the music industry.

In article ,
says...

On 7/17/2013 5:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:

http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg

Rolling Stone is not what it started out to be. It's not even about the
Artists and Music anymore, it's about celebrity and social gossip...

Gee, that's odd, if you look at the index, 99% of the articles and clips
are about music and the music industry.....

On 7/17/13 5:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:

http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg


What's the problem? The article outlines how the kid became a monster.
Neither it nor the cover extol the kid's virtues.

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ...

On 7/17/13 5:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:

http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg


What's the problem? The article outlines how the kid became a monster.
Neither it nor the cover extol the kid's virtues.


----------------------------------

The problem is in giving terrorists like him the media attention and
recognition that they seek.

Maybe you would like to explain that there is "no problem" to the
thousands .... probably millions by now .... of people who find it in
very poor taste.

Even the Facebook "Boycott Rolling Stones Magazine for their latest
cover" has over 86,000 "likes" in just 22 hours. Maybe you could
start there.

https://www.facebook.com/BoycottRoll...eirLatestCover

"Eisboch" wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ...

On 7/17/13 5:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:

http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg


What's the problem? The article outlines how the kid became a monster.
Neither it nor the cover extol the kid's virtues.


----------------------------------

The problem is in giving terrorists like him the media attention and
recognition that they seek.

Maybe you would like to explain that there is "no problem" to the
thousands .... probably millions by now .... of people who find it in very poor taste.

Even the Facebook "Boycott Rolling Stones Magazine for their latest
cover" has over 86,000 "likes" in just 22 hours. Maybe you could start there.

https://www.facebook.com/BoycottRoll...eirLatestCover

The media has always sensationalized monsters and put them on magazine
covers ... Osama, mcveigh, and many more.

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:59:41 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


http://htmlimg1.scribdassets.com/77b0v1m4w02mby3m/images/1-b8e73331f6.jpg

Well said. The magazine is catching some financial heat also. Good.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!