On 7/17/2013 10:57 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:41 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:50 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 7:20 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:12:08 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...rape?

Republicans.

Republicans are obsessed with rape.
http://tinyurl.com/kkms3jw

Great opinion, now to be balanced and no show a one sideed view...


http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/...rage_sex_too_1


Homosexual sex, no less. But Harry think that's the best kind, so he
gives the democrats a pass for that one.
I'll bet you can't find another case of democrats having disgraceful
and
inappropriate sex.


Well there is this disgusting Mayor in California lately. He just grabs
women, drags them aside, and sticks his hands inside their clothes while
he forces himself on them.... Maybe harry should take his gun and start
there...

But, is he a Democrat?

Of course... he is forcing him self on mothers and grandmothers right in
his employ...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/254957193...s-resignation/


Funny how consensual sex is bad for republicans, but forced sex or
subordinates forcing sex on interns and office personnel seems to be ok
for Dems...

He says he treats men and women the same. Does that count for anything?

On 7/17/2013 11:29 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:57 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:41 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:50 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 7:20 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:12:08 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...rape?

Republicans.

Republicans are obsessed with rape.
http://tinyurl.com/kkms3jw

Great opinion, now to be balanced and no show a one sideed view...


http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/...rage_sex_too_1


Homosexual sex, no less. But Harry think that's the best kind, so he
gives the democrats a pass for that one.
I'll bet you can't find another case of democrats having disgraceful
and
inappropriate sex.


Well there is this disgusting Mayor in California lately. He just grabs
women, drags them aside, and sticks his hands inside their clothes
while
he forces himself on them.... Maybe harry should take his gun and start
there...

But, is he a Democrat?

Of course... he is forcing him self on mothers and grandmothers right in
his employ...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/254957193...s-resignation/



Funny how consensual sex is bad for republicans, but forced sex or
subordinates forcing sex on interns and office personnel seems to be ok
for Dems...

He says he treats men and women the same. Does that count for anything?

Somewhat irrelevant... he is a psychopath, an animal, doubt he knows the
difference.

In article ,
says...

On 7/17/2013 11:29 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:57 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:41 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:37 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:50 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 7:20 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:12:08 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...rape?

Republicans.

Republicans are obsessed with rape.
http://tinyurl.com/kkms3jw

Great opinion, now to be balanced and no show a one sideed view...


http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/...rage_sex_too_1


Homosexual sex, no less. But Harry think that's the best kind, so he
gives the democrats a pass for that one.
I'll bet you can't find another case of democrats having disgraceful
and
inappropriate sex.


Well there is this disgusting Mayor in California lately. He just grabs
women, drags them aside, and sticks his hands inside their clothes
while
he forces himself on them.... Maybe harry should take his gun and start
there...

But, is he a Democrat?

Of course... he is forcing him self on mothers and grandmothers right in
his employ...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/254957193...s-resignation/



Funny how consensual sex is bad for republicans, but forced sex or
subordinates forcing sex on interns and office personnel seems to be ok
for Dems...

He says he treats men and women the same. Does that count for anything?

Somewhat irrelevant... he is a psychopath, an animal, doubt he knows the
difference.

Kind of like you when your jawbone comes unhinged?

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:12:08 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

...rape?

Some snippage.

Thank God for the morning after pill.

I sure can't understand why it should take a woman who's been raped more than a day to decide to
abort. Why isn't 20 weeks long enough to make that decision? The same is true for victims of incest.
Why wait 20 weeks to make a decision?

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 06:19:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/16/13 10:08 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:12:08 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

If Republicans ever want to hold public
office again, they will abandon their anti-women agenda and their vile
rhetoric. Until then, women will always remember in November.

http://tinyurl.com/kkms3jw

===

I don't disagree, but Harry, why don't you post this stuff where it
might make a difference, or create a Republican sock puppet letter
writing campaign? You like creative writing, should be easy for you.

Do you really think you will convince anyone in a boating newsgroup?


I have no interest in "convincing" anyone in a boating newsgroup that
Republicans hate women.

Then what's your point?

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:12:08 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

...rape?

Some snippage.

Thank God for the morning after pill.

I sure can't understand why it should take a woman who's been raped more than a day to decide to
abort. Why isn't 20 weeks long enough to make that decision? The same is true for victims of incest.
Why wait 20 weeks to make a decision?

John (Gun Nut) H.

Some people actually THINK before they leap. I know, it's not part of
your vocabulary. If Scotty's jaw is aligned, ask him to help you
understand.

On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 6:37:12 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/17/13 7:20 AM, Tim wrote:

On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:12:08 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

...rape?



Republicans.



Republicans are obsessed with rape.

http://tinyurl.com/kkms3jw



Great opinion, now to be balanced and no show a one sideed view...





http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/...rage_sex_too_1







So, you think there is some sort of equivalency between a pedophile and

the belief of many significant Republican Party leaders that rape is no

big deal, eh?



Interesting.

I don't know of ANY republicans that believe 'rape' is a good thing.

Why do you think that a long article like that which you posted would be worthy of a reprint, let alone, a read by anyone with even a menial means of intellect?

On 7/17/13 6:05 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 6:37:12 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/17/13 7:20 AM, Tim wrote:

On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:12:08 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

...rape?



Republicans.



Republicans are obsessed with rape.

http://tinyurl.com/kkms3jw



Great opinion, now to be balanced and no show a one sideed view...





http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/...rage_sex_too_1







So, you think there is some sort of equivalency between a pedophile and

the belief of many significant Republican Party leaders that rape is no

big deal, eh?



Interesting.

I don't know of ANY republicans that believe 'rape' is a good thing.

Why do you think that a long article like that which you posted would be worthy of a reprint, let alone, a read by anyone with even a menial means of intellect?



I didn't say Republicans thought rape was a good thing. I said that many
Republicans have stated that rape is no big deal.

No big deal and not a good thing are not equivalents.

Why was the article worth reposting? Because it demonstrates clearly
what little consideration many leading Republicans have for the brutal
crime of rape, and how little they care for women. "It's only rape,
after all, nothing serious. Just have that baby the rapist impregnated
you with...it's part of god's plan."

Got it?

On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:10:50 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/17/13 6:05 PM, Tim wrote:

On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 6:37:12 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 7/17/13 7:20 AM, Tim wrote:



On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:12:08 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



...rape?







Republicans.







Republicans are obsessed with rape.



http://tinyurl.com/kkms3jw







Great opinion, now to be balanced and no show a one sideed view...











http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/...rage_sex_too_1















So, you think there is some sort of equivalency between a pedophile and



the belief of many significant Republican Party leaders that rape is no



big deal, eh?







Interesting.



I don't know of ANY republicans that believe 'rape' is a good thing.



Why do you think that a long article like that which you posted would be worthy of a reprint, let alone, a read by anyone with even a menial means of intellect?







I didn't say Republicans thought rape was a good thing. I said that many

Republicans have stated that rape is no big deal.



No big deal and not a good thing are not equivalents.



Why was the article worth reposting? Because it demonstrates clearly

what little consideration many leading Republicans have for the brutal

crime of rape, and how little they care for women. "It's only rape,

after all, nothing serious. Just have that baby the rapist impregnated

you with...it's part of god's plan."



Got it?

No I don't "got it"

You're opening title said

"Who loves....rape? Republicans.

That is a statement posted by you.


I seriously doubt that if you didn't agree with that article, you wouldn't have posted it.