wrote:
On Monday, July 8, 2013 9:32:54 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/13 9:27 PM, Tim wrote:

On Monday, July 8, 2013 11:54:54 AM UTC-5, wrote:



Funny (strange) that you claim that lefties are the ones that have a
heart and want to help their fellow man, but when you purposefully
don't spend your tourist dollars on that I-95 corridor, you're hurting
exactly the ones that need help the most.







For you, politics trumps compassion.





Odd, I've never seen anyone (business) in a 'busy' tourist trap that
was hurting for lack of tourist dollars...





I see no reason to support backwards, racist, anti-government.

anti-woman, anti voters' rights states like South Carolina or Texas with

tourism business.

So you hate Nikki Haley, the minority woman Governor of SC? Ah, got it.

Actually, you don't but it doesn't matter.

On Monday, July 8, 2013 9:54:43 PM UTC-4, F. O. A. D. wrote:
wrote:


So you hate Nikki Haley, the minority woman Governor of SC? Ah, got it.

Actually, you don't but it doesn't matter.

So tell us why you hate the underclass workers so much on the I-95 corridor through SC so much that you won't spend your money there. The liberal voting base. After all, you'd be supporting Jim Clyburn.

On Monday, July 8, 2013 10:39:24 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:32:54 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



I see no reason to support backwards, racist, anti-government.

anti-woman, anti voters' rights states like South Carolina or Texas with

tourism business.



Humm... I don't seem to remember Maryland ever electing a female

governor or a person of any ethnic minority for that office.

They were all white guys and more than a few were corrupt.

He's chosen a "team" and it doesn't matter how corrupt they are.

On 7/8/2013 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Monday, July 8, 2013 10:39:24 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:32:54 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



I see no reason to support backwards, racist, anti-government.

anti-woman, anti voters' rights states like South Carolina or Texas with

tourism business.



Humm... I don't seem to remember Maryland ever electing a female

governor or a person of any ethnic minority for that office.

They were all white guys and more than a few were corrupt.

He's chosen a "team" and it doesn't matter how corrupt they are.


Loyalty is a powerful force.
Remember how loyal O'Bama was to The Rev.Jerramiah Wright. He stuck with
him wright up until the time he realized that Wright might cost him the
election.

On 7/8/13 10:39 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:32:54 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I see no reason to support backwards, racist, anti-government.
anti-woman, anti voters' rights states like South Carolina or Texas with
tourism business.

Humm... I don't seem to remember Maryland ever electing a female
governor or a person of any ethnic minority for that office.
They were all white guys and more than a few were corrupt.


You don't have to be a woman politician to not be anti-woman, or a black
politician to not be anti-black. Further, I don't expect all the players
in our political system to be pure as the driven snow in corruption.
Maryland is not particularly backwards, racist, anti-government,
anti-woman, or anti voters' rights.

On 7/8/13 10:45 PM, wrote:
On Monday, July 8, 2013 9:54:43 PM UTC-4, F. O. A. D. wrote:
wrote:


So you hate Nikki Haley, the minority woman Governor of SC? Ah, got it.

Actually, you don't but it doesn't matter.

So tell us why you hate the underclass workers so much on the I-95 corridor through SC so much that you won't spend your money there. The liberal voting base. After all, you'd be supporting Jim Clyburn.



You can always depend on some of the right-wingers here to try to
personalize their obvious hatred for those whose political opinions
differ from theirs, eh? In my comments about South Carolina, I directed
nothing towards you personally or, in fact, any other poster here.

And always with the accusations of "hate."

On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 6:33:49 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/13 10:45 PM, wrote:

On Monday, July 8, 2013 9:54:43 PM UTC-4, F. O. A. D. wrote:

wrote:





So you hate Nikki Haley, the minority woman Governor of SC? Ah, got it.



Actually, you don't but it doesn't matter.



So tell us why you hate the underclass workers so much on the I-95 corridor through SC so much that you won't spend your money there. The liberal voting base. After all, you'd be supporting Jim Clyburn.







You can always depend on some of the right-wingers here to try to

personalize their obvious hatred for those whose political opinions

differ from theirs, eh? In my comments about South Carolina, I directed

nothing towards you personally or, in fact, any other poster here.



And always with the accusations of "hate."

"their obvious hatred" Pot-kettle.

You pointed out what you personally did. I pointed out the obvious hypocrisy of your actions.

On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:33:49 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

You can always depend on some of the right-wingers here to try to

personalize their obvious hatred for those whose political opinions

differ from theirs, eh? ...
And always with the accusations of "hate."

Your statement also applies well for the left-wingers, bro.

On 7/9/13 7:48 AM, wrote:
On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 6:33:49 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/13 10:45 PM, wrote:

On Monday, July 8, 2013 9:54:43 PM UTC-4, F. O. A. D. wrote:

wrote:





So you hate Nikki Haley, the minority woman Governor of SC? Ah, got it.



Actually, you don't but it doesn't matter.



So tell us why you hate the underclass workers so much on the I-95 corridor through SC so much that you won't spend your money there. The liberal voting base. After all, you'd be supporting Jim Clyburn.







You can always depend on some of the right-wingers here to try to

personalize their obvious hatred for those whose political opinions

differ from theirs, eh? In my comments about South Carolina, I directed

nothing towards you personally or, in fact, any other poster here.



And always with the accusations of "hate."

"their obvious hatred" Pot-kettle.

You pointed out what you personally did. I pointed out the obvious hypocrisy of your actions.



Please point out in this exchange where I have singled you out beyond
pointing out the fallacy in your Nikki Haley claim.

Oh, and being "female" puts Ms. Haley in the majority in this country.
Perhaps you are referring to her ethnic background...her ancestry from
India? Or her Sikh religion? What is your reference? When I see photos
or video clips of her, I see a physically attractive woman who looks as
if she has a decent tan. I certainly cannot determine what "race" she
might be, nor do I care.

I don't like Governor Haley's right-wing politics, but I certainly don't
"hate" her or even "dislike" her.

On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:15:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/13 10:39 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:32:54 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I see no reason to support backwards, racist, anti-government.
anti-woman, anti voters' rights states like South Carolina or Texas with
tourism business.

Humm... I don't seem to remember Maryland ever electing a female
governor or a person of any ethnic minority for that office.
They were all white guys and more than a few were corrupt.


You don't have to be a woman politician to not be anti-woman, or a black
politician to not be anti-black. Further, I don't expect all the players
in our political system to be pure as the driven snow in corruption.
Maryland is not particularly backwards, racist, anti-government,
anti-woman, or anti voters' rights.

The fact that the sky is not blue does not mean that it's not going to rain.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!