In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...


How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks
have expired?

The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier.



Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should
make and would make an instant decision like that?

Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with.

I'll ask again. Because it's due to rape or incest, the woman must
choose instantly?

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...


How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks
have expired?

The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier.



Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should
make and would make an instant decision like that?

Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with.

And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...


How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks
have expired?

The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier.



Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should
make and would make an instant decision like that?

Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with.

And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'.

John (Gun Nut) H.

So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision
whether or not to abort a fetus?

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:28:49 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:



On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

says...





How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks

have expired?



The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier.







Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should

make and would make an instant decision like that?



Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with.

And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'.

Bingo!

On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...


How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks
have expired?

The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier.



Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should
make and would make an instant decision like that?

Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with.

And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'.

John (Gun Nut) H.

So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision
whether or not to abort a fetus?



As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn
about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they
give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births
are ways to try to control women.

On 6/25/2013 4:48 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...


How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is
due to rape or incest before 20 weeks
have expired?

The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19
6/7ths weeks earlier.



Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman
should
make and would make an instant decision like that?

Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If
after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping
it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to
begin with.

And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'.

John (Gun Nut) H.

So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision
whether or not to abort a fetus?



As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn
about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they
give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births
are ways to try to control women.


You are delusional...

On 6/25/13 5:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 6/25/2013 4:48 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...


How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is
due to rape or incest before 20 weeks
have expired?

The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19
6/7ths weeks earlier.



Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman
should
make and would make an instant decision like that?

Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If
after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping
it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to
begin with.

And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'.

John (Gun Nut) H.

So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision
whether or not to abort a fetus?



As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn
about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they
give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births
are ways to try to control women.


You are delusional...


Sorry, but I've been watching the GOP federal legislators, governors,
and state legislators for years on this issue, and what they are doing
is what their extremist base is telling them to do. The extremist base,
the doctrinaire righties, controls the Republican party. There's
certainly no morality behind these beliefs, because if there were,
they'd be acting differently towards women and children.

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn
about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason
they
give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term
births
are ways to try to control women.

-----------------------------------------------

I don't buy that argument for a minute. Anyone who consumes oxygen
on this planet in this day and age knows there's no such thing as
"controlling women".

I think is more related to traditional values and faith beliefs,
right or wrong. I've cashed out on this issue. I remain pro-life
but pro-choice.
I know what I would do. What others do is their business.

On 6/25/2013 5:36 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/25/13 5:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 6/25/2013 4:48 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...


How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is
due to rape or incest before 20 weeks
have expired?

The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19
6/7ths weeks earlier.



Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman
should
make and would make an instant decision like that?

Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If
after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping
it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to
begin with.

And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'.

John (Gun Nut) H.

So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision
whether or not to abort a fetus?



As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn
about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they
give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births
are ways to try to control women.


You are delusional...


Sorry, but I've been watching the GOP federal legislators, governors,
and state legislators for years on this issue, and what they are doing
is what their extremist base is telling them to do. The extremist base,
the doctrinaire righties, controls the Republican party. There's
certainly no morality behind these beliefs, because if there were,
they'd be acting differently towards women and children.


Just because you don't see it, doesn't mean it isn't there. That is the
problem with the left, so intolerant and dismissive across the board...

On 6/25/13 5:37 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn
about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they
give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births
are ways to try to control women.

-----------------------------------------------

I don't buy that argument for a minute. Anyone who consumes oxygen on
this planet in this day and age knows there's no such thing as
"controlling women".

I think is more related to traditional values and faith beliefs, right
or wrong. I've cashed out on this issue. I remain pro-life but
pro-choice.
I know what I would do. What others do is their business.




The right-wing religious bozos talk all the time about the need to
control women and keep women subservient. It does work, not in your
household or mine, but it does work. Women are very much controlled in
many of these conservative superreligious families.

Love the GOP state lawmaker in Texas who recently said use of a rape kit
would prevent pregnancy.

D'oh.