More info.. not looking good...
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no
wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-)

====

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues.
It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down.

Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really
small old dick. And of course your assumption I stated the shirt
manufacturer was making a $4.50 net profit on a $9.00 shirt.
Banisters...no wonder this country is ****ed. Have nice day.

More info.. not looking good...
 

F.O.A.D. wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no
wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-)

====

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues.
It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down.

Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really
small old dick. And of course your assumption I stated the shirt
manufacturer was making a $4.50 net profit on a $9.00 shirt.
Banisters...no wonder this country is ****ed. Have nice day.

Bankster...damned Siri ! 😄

More info.. not looking good...
 

On 24 Jun 2013 03:42:56 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

F.O.A.D. wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no
wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-)

====

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues.
It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down.

Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really
small old dick. And of course your assumption I stated the shirt
manufacturer was making a $4.50 net profit on a $9.00 shirt.
Banisters...no wonder this country is ****ed. Have nice day.

Bankster...damned Siri ! ?

========

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem
issues. It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else
down.

More info.. not looking good...
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ...

Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no
wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-)

====

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem
issues.
It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down.

Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a
really
small old dick.
-----------------------------------------

Nonesense. Wayne has a big old boat because he lives on it for 5
months at a time and uses it to travel to places that most of us would
only dream of navigating to. Everyone has their type of boating and
interests. Few do what Wayne does.

More info.. not looking good...
 

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..


On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:02:37 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


I am not advocating a background check every time you buy a gun.
The
background check is done once to obtain a permit.


Why should I have to obtain a permit in order to exercise one of my
civil rights?

Do you advocate a permit for speaking freely?

Do you advocate a permit for going to church?

Do you advocate a permit for registering to vote.

The issue is one not having to ask permission to provide yourself
with
the means to protect
yourself. ...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall
not
be infringed.

-----------------------------------------------

A requirement to obtain a gun permit with an accompanying background
check does not infringe on your rights. Your interpretation of the
2nd Amendment suggests that *everyone*, regardless of age and
including convicted felons should be able to own a gun, no
questions
asked. Furthermore, it would seem that current laws that prevent
them
from owning a gun are unconstitutional as are firearms laws in many
states that already require a permit and background check, based on
your logic.

As for your other questions, give me a break, will ya? Comparing
gun ownership and it's responsibilities with the right to attend the
church of your choice is a pretty stupid argument against gun
permits
and background checks. Plus, I'll repeat again, having to obtain
a
permit is *not* a restriction of your rights.

Why do I have to ask the government to allow me to exercise my god
given rights?

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among
these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness.

--------------------------------------------

Good grief. So, criminals, rapists and serial murderers have a
*Right* to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness?

You make no sense. Again, I'll repeat, having to obtain a gun permit
and submit to a background check to ensure you are not one of the
above is *not* a violation of your Constitutional rights. Why is
this so hard to understand?

More info.. not looking good...
 

wrote in message ...

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 19:54:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"BAR" wrote in message
...


On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:02:37 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


I am not advocating a background check every time you buy a gun.
The
background check is done once to obtain a permit.


Why should I have to obtain a permit in order to exercise one of my
civil rights?

Do you advocate a permit for speaking freely?

Do you advocate a permit for going to church?

Do you advocate a permit for registering to vote.

The issue is one not having to ask permission to provide yourself
with
the means to protect
yourself. ...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not
be infringed.

-----------------------------------------------

A requirement to obtain a gun permit with an accompanying background
check does not infringe on your rights. Your interpretation of the
2nd Amendment suggests that *everyone*, regardless of age and
including convicted felons should be able to own a gun, no
questions
asked. Furthermore, it would seem that current laws that prevent
them
from owning a gun are unconstitutional as are firearms laws in many
states that already require a permit and background check, based on
your logic.

As for your other questions, give me a break, will ya? Comparing
gun ownership and it's responsibilities with the right to attend the
church of your choice is a pretty stupid argument against gun permits
and background checks. Plus, I'll repeat again, having to obtain a
permit is *not* a restriction of your rights.

I good number of us submit to this voluntarily to get the right to
carry. I am exempt from background checks and waiting periods.

I also used to own a legal machine gun so I am no stranger to
background checks.

-------------------------------------------------

The requirements to simply "own" a firearm and the requirements to own
and carry in public (concealed or open) are different.
A permit is required for concealed or open carry in most states. It's
also why some (like MA) is a "may" and "shall" state as far as the
issuance of permits go. Neither violate anyone's right to own a
firearm. The only reason a permit will not be issued is if you have
a felony record and are legally not eligible to own one. *That* is
the purpose of a cursory background check. That's all. It's not to
"take away" your rights unless you deserve to have them taken.

Geeze. Why is this so hard for people to understand?

More info.. not looking good...
 

On 6/24/13 12:05 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 24 Jun 2013 03:42:56 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

F.O.A.D. wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no
wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-)

====

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues.
It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down.

Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really
small old dick. And of course your assumption I stated the shirt
manufacturer was making a $4.50 net profit on a $9.00 shirt.
Banisters...no wonder this country is ****ed. Have nice day.

Bankster...damned Siri ! ?

========

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem
issues. It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else
down.


Wayne's name calling in rec.boats is just another example of his
hypocrisy. He claims he wants posters in here to be behave decently,
but, of course, what he says he wants doesn't apply to him.

More info.. not looking good...
 

On 6/24/13 4:46 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ...

Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no
wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-)

====

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues.
It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down.

Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really
small old dick.
-----------------------------------------

Nonesense. Wayne has a big old boat because he lives on it for 5 months
at a time and uses it to travel to places that most of us would only
dream of navigating to. Everyone has their type of boating and
interests. Few do what Wayne does.




To each his own. What Wayne does for "five months at a time," indeed for
the whole year, seems vacuous to me. To me, the idea of being *that*
retired with nothing really to do but putter around in a boat for half
the year seems mindless and completely self-indulgent.

More info.. not looking good...
 

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 06:23:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/24/13 4:46 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ...

Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no
wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-)

====

Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues.
It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down.

Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really
small old dick.
-----------------------------------------

Nonesense. Wayne has a big old boat because he lives on it for 5 months
at a time and uses it to travel to places that most of us would only
dream of navigating to. Everyone has their type of boating and
interests. Few do what Wayne does.




To each his own. What Wayne does for "five months at a time," indeed for
the whole year, seems vacuous to me. To me, the idea of being *that*
retired with nothing really to do but putter around in a boat for half
the year seems mindless and completely self-indulgent.

Jealousy for breakfast?

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

More info.. not looking good...
 

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 04:52:24 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"BAR" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..


On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:02:37 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


I am not advocating a background check every time you buy a gun.
The
background check is done once to obtain a permit.


Why should I have to obtain a permit in order to exercise one of my
civil rights?

Do you advocate a permit for speaking freely?

Do you advocate a permit for going to church?

Do you advocate a permit for registering to vote.

The issue is one not having to ask permission to provide yourself
with
the means to protect
yourself. ...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall
not
be infringed.

-----------------------------------------------

A requirement to obtain a gun permit with an accompanying background
check does not infringe on your rights. Your interpretation of the
2nd Amendment suggests that *everyone*, regardless of age and
including convicted felons should be able to own a gun, no
questions
asked. Furthermore, it would seem that current laws that prevent
them
from owning a gun are unconstitutional as are firearms laws in many
states that already require a permit and background check, based on
your logic.

As for your other questions, give me a break, will ya? Comparing
gun ownership and it's responsibilities with the right to attend the
church of your choice is a pretty stupid argument against gun
permits
and background checks. Plus, I'll repeat again, having to obtain
a
permit is *not* a restriction of your rights.

Why do I have to ask the government to allow me to exercise my god
given rights?

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among
these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness.

--------------------------------------------

Good grief. So, criminals, rapists and serial murderers have a
*Right* to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness?

You make no sense. Again, I'll repeat, having to obtain a gun permit
and submit to a background check to ensure you are not one of the
above is *not* a violation of your Constitutional rights. Why is
this so hard to understand?


Criminals, rapists and serial murderers won't be abiding by the law in any case.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!