| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#31
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The Dick is back.
On 5/16/13 9:46 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 5/15/13 11:47 PM, Eisboch wrote: "Boating All Out" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Boating All Out" wrote in message ... In article , says... Sometimes it is hard to take some of your comments seriously Harry because you are so adamantly opposed to anything other than the liberal way. Thinking Cheney is trash is hardly "liberal." No more than thinking Al Sharpton is trash is "conservative." You can defend either if you wish. Pick one. --------------------------------------- If you haven't, read up on Sharpton's past. I just did that. Turns out he's cleaner than I thought. Don't care for him much, as he's a "race man." Not into that. And he's too loud. But I see only misdemeanor convictions related to protests. Didn't come off well in the Brawley incident either, maligning people, then not paying up in the civil suit. But nothing like this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-FfXmhmj5E War, death and destruction. So what's your exact beef with little Al Sharpton? Too uppity? ------------------------------------------ No, not too "uppity". I think he's a phony and a racist who uses his credentials as a "Reverend" to influence and persuade people in political matters. He was ordained as a child as a Pentecostal minister. The type of "ordination" he received in this faith is not main stream Christianity unless you believe in speaking in tongues and the ability to heal the sick and raise the dead. It's not based on any formal education in theology. Sharpton attended college but dropped out after two years. I watch his show "Politics Nation" from time to time mainly because he can be quite funny sometimes. But usually I have to switch off to the History Channel or Discovery Channel after a while because he starts to get under my skin with some of his biased comments. I thought it was interesting that in a recent advertisement for MSNBC, the "Reverend" recites part of the Pledge of Allegiance, purposely leaving out the "under God" part. Thought that was interesting for someone who claims to be a minister in a Christian faith. But, that's just me. The pledge was written by a socialist minister and then spoken for many years without the "under god" bull****. That phrase wasn't said during my grammar school days in New Haven, either, when in 1954 Congress moronically worked those two words into the pledge. In fact, by 1957, the pledge was dropped from recitation entirely in junior high because of those two words, which many, even those who claimed to be religious, found offensive for any number of reasons. We didn't have "school prayer," either, for the same reasons. -------------------------------------------------- So, you figure that the "Rev" dropped the phrase because he found it offensive? I don't know. I always found it offensive. |
|
#32
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dick is back.
On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: It also allows me (if so motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I might engage in... Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out so well, eh? ---------------------------------------------------- Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free activity. The morons here try so hard and fail completely. Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense." |
|
#34
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dick is back.
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:48:09 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote in message ... On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: It also allows me (if so motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I might engage in... Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out so well, eh? ---------------------------------------------------- Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free activity. Not sure who *you* are, since google shows you both to be foad/eisboch interchangeably. The statement, obviously, was about him. |
|
#35
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dick is back.
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:24:43 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: It also allows me (if so motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I might engage in... Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out so well, eh? ---------------------------------------------------- Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free activity. The morons here try so hard and fail completely. The records show it is *you* who has failed. |
|
#36
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dick is back.
In article ,
says... On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:54:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:51:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... 501(C)(4) abuse Cite? http://tinyurl.com/7hfygw2 Until fairly recently Sharpton's main source of income was the National Action Network a 501(C)(4). Both the IRS and the State of New York went after him for about a million dollars worth of taxes because of irregularities in his reporting Not true at all and you have NO data to back that up. He's scum but this is just not true. He works for FOX, MSNBC, etc. He started working for them fairly recently, certainly less than 10 years ago. Most of his life was funded by several dodgy "non-profits" that used racial blackmail to lever up contributions from companies that did not want trouble from him. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_aqIhGdMti9wDeM4k4dMvZJ;jsessionid=C58FE1DF981 839B7BCE471FD5494737C http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_83CBBYgMujzxLtqgHzPAuN;jsessionid=F4E688C1DE8 17ABB113FC81B634D3D9E http://pohdiaries.com/al-sharptons-tax-problems-just-got-bigger/ The list goes on. These URL's prove that Sharpton hasn't had legitimate income (and quite a bit of it) HOW? |
|
#37
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dick is back.
On 5/16/13 11:21 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:54:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:51:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... 501(C)(4) abuse Cite? http://tinyurl.com/7hfygw2 Until fairly recently Sharpton's main source of income was the National Action Network a 501(C)(4). Both the IRS and the State of New York went after him for about a million dollars worth of taxes because of irregularities in his reporting Not true at all and you have NO data to back that up. He's scum but this is just not true. He works for FOX, MSNBC, etc. He started working for them fairly recently, certainly less than 10 years ago. Most of his life was funded by several dodgy "non-profits" that used racial blackmail to lever up contributions from companies that did not want trouble from him. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_aqIhGdMti9wDeM4k4dMvZJ;jsessionid=C58FE1DF981 839B7BCE471FD5494737C http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_83CBBYgMujzxLtqgHzPAuN;jsessionid=F4E688C1DE8 17ABB113FC81B634D3D9E http://pohdiaries.com/al-sharptons-tax-problems-just-got-bigger/ The list goes on. Nothing Al did financially comes close to equaling what any given bankster has done. |
|
#38
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dick is back.
In article ,
says... On Thu, 16 May 2013 11:28:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:54:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:51:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... 501(C)(4) abuse Cite? http://tinyurl.com/7hfygw2 Until fairly recently Sharpton's main source of income was the National Action Network a 501(C)(4). Both the IRS and the State of New York went after him for about a million dollars worth of taxes because of irregularities in his reporting Not true at all and you have NO data to back that up. He's scum but this is just not true. He works for FOX, MSNBC, etc. He started working for them fairly recently, certainly less than 10 years ago. Most of his life was funded by several dodgy "non-profits" that used racial blackmail to lever up contributions from companies that did not want trouble from him. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_aqIhGdMti9wDeM4k4dMvZJ;jsessionid=C58FE1DF981 839B7BCE471FD5494737C http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_83CBBYgMujzxLtqgHzPAuN;jsessionid=F4E688C1DE8 17ABB113FC81B634D3D9E http://pohdiaries.com/al-sharptons-tax-problems-just-got-bigger/ The list goes on. These URL's prove that Sharpton hasn't had legitimate income (and quite a bit of it) HOW? This sounds like blackmail to me. If you pay him, you are suddenly not a racist company. ************** Anheuser-Busch gave him six figures, Colgate-Palmolive shelled out $50,000 and Macy's and Pfizer have contributed thousands to the Rev. Al Sharpton's charity. Almost 50 companies - including PepsiCo, General Motors, Wal-Mart, FedEx, Continental Airlines, Johnson & Johnson and Chase - and some labor unions sponsored Sharpton's National Action Network annual conference in April. Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks, critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a consultant. The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances. There are corporations upon corporations donating to causes much more than Sharptons. Are they all crooks? Red Cross? United Way? Muscular Dystrophy? Alzheimer's Foundation? |
|
#39
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dick is back.
On 5/16/13 1:53 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:18:48 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Anheuser-Busch gave him six figures, Colgate-Palmolive shelled out $50,000 and Macy's and Pfizer have contributed thousands to the Rev. Al Sharpton's charity. Almost 50 companies - including PepsiCo, General Motors, Wal-Mart, FedEx, Continental Airlines, Johnson & Johnson and Chase - and some labor unions sponsored Sharpton's National Action Network annual conference in April. Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks, critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a consultant. The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances. There are corporations upon corporations donating to causes much more than Sharptons. Are they all crooks? Red Cross? United Way? Muscular Dystrophy? Alzheimer's Foundation? As usual, you miss the point. The donors are not crooks but they are blackmailed into donating so as not to be declared racist by a guy who used those unfounded claims to make a living for 3 decades. Blackmail? Is PsychoSnotty involved? |
|
#40
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dick is back.
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Here you go Dick... | General | |||
| Thanks, Dick & Don | General | |||
| it should seemingly behave in back of Felix when the sweet frames shout in back of the strong monolith | ASA | |||
| for Gilbert the carpenter's sharp, in back of me it's strange, whereas in back of you it's calling heavy | ASA | |||
Linear Mode
