Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#72
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/16/2013 11:41 AM, thumper wrote:
On 5/16/2013 7:00 AM, wrote: On Thu, 16 May 2013 07:29:08 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: Between Windoze and Androis, who's "needs" are not being met? I don't know much about android but PC users might want an OS that will run a week or two without a reboot, either from a crash or an update. They would also like one with a stable API so you don't need to update your OS for the next big thing, usually requiring a new machine.. Windoze is the last vestige of planned obsolescence Our IC design CAD tools from Cadence, Synopsys, Ansys, Mentor Graphics, etc. all run on redhat Linux for those reasons. I run Cadkey, Dreamweaver, Photoshop, Macromedia Flash, Corel Draw and several other pretty intense programs... all on a Windoze Laptop for three years now. I5 chip, running at 2.27 64 bit only 4 gig ram... Does fine, can't remember the last time I crashed it... |
#73
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/16/2013 11:46 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/16/13 11:36 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 5/16/2013 10:50 AM, wrote: On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:10:53 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... I don't know much about android but PC users might want an OS that will run a week or two without a reboot, either from a crash or an update. They would also like one with a stable API so you don't need to update your OS for the next big thing, usually requiring a new machine.. Windoze is the last vestige of planned obsolescence Because of the complexity of the operating systems of today, I doubt that's possible. The problem is that the OS is all encompassing with things that should be optional, being coded right into the OS. It is unnecessary complexity but part of the Microsoft monopoly thinking. I need the same OS to take a few hundred bytes a minute from my weather station and post it on the web as I would use to run a small publishing company But what is it that the system "doesn't" do for you? What part of the system is keeping you from doing what you could do without it?? OSX has never locked up on me in the middle of a long word processing document between auto saves. Windows did. Fool. If you anticipate it locking up, you should autosave more often |
#74
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/16/2013 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 11:36:29 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 5/16/2013 10:50 AM, wrote: On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:10:53 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... I don't know much about android but PC users might want an OS that will run a week or two without a reboot, either from a crash or an update. They would also like one with a stable API so you don't need to update your OS for the next big thing, usually requiring a new machine.. Windoze is the last vestige of planned obsolescence Because of the complexity of the operating systems of today, I doubt that's possible. The problem is that the OS is all encompassing with things that should be optional, being coded right into the OS. It is unnecessary complexity but part of the Microsoft monopoly thinking. I need the same OS to take a few hundred bytes a minute from my weather station and post it on the web as I would use to run a small publishing company But what is it that the system "doesn't" do for you? What part of the system is keeping you from doing what you could do without it?? It is the amount of bloatware I need to drag around for such a mundane task and I was actually buying new, the cost. It is like being forced to buy a class A motor home, just to drive a few miles to work. Linux would be a good alternative but the number of hardware manufacturers who support it are limited because MS has such a monopoly share of the market. So, if you strip the "bloatware" from the system, what would be the benefit? Systems would be more proprietary like in the 80's and a base system would cost 2 grand... It would not be a smaller system, still you need a decent screen to work anyway, I just don't see what you are suffering carrying around a few million extra bits of info on a chip as small as your fingernail (nothing at all like having to carry around a "class A motor home")...It is a system designed to handle as much of what the average person throws at it as possible. If you need more than that to run your company, it's time to hire some programmers and build that system. We had a company a few years back that needed such a propritary system for their business, they paid us thousands to build it. For 99% of the world population, Windoze will do anything they need it to do. |
#75
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/16/13 12:47 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
We had a company a few years back that needed such a propritary system for their business, they paid us thousands to build it. Bull****. Morons don't have the ability to program operating systems. |
#76
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/16/13 11:47 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/16/2013 11:41 AM, thumper wrote: On 5/16/2013 7:00 AM, wrote: On Thu, 16 May 2013 07:29:08 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: Between Windoze and Androis, who's "needs" are not being met? I don't know much about android but PC users might want an OS that will run a week or two without a reboot, either from a crash or an update. They would also like one with a stable API so you don't need to update your OS for the next big thing, usually requiring a new machine.. Windoze is the last vestige of planned obsolescence Our IC design CAD tools from Cadence, Synopsys, Ansys, Mentor Graphics, etc. all run on redhat Linux for those reasons. I run Cadkey, Dreamweaver, Photoshop, Macromedia Flash, Corel Draw and several other pretty intense programs... all on a Windoze Laptop for three years now. I5 chip, running at 2.27 64 bit only 4 gig ram... Does fine, can't remember the last time I crashed it... From what I have seen of your work, you'd do better with an eight color box of Crayolas. |
#77
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SNERK
|
#78
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On Mon, 13 May 2013 16:29:33 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 5/13/2013 2:53 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: After hundreds of workers were killed in Bangladesh when the factory they worked at making clothes collapsed, Pope Francis took a moment during his May Day homily to pray for the victims and their families as well as condemn the labor practices that took their lives. ?How many brothers and sisters find themselves in this situation!? said the pontiff referring to the unfair and unsafe working conditions around the world. ?Not paying fairly, not giving a job because you are only looking at balance sheets, only looking at how to make a profit. That goes against God!? He couldn?t believe that the workers inside the factory were only making roughly 38 Euros ($50) per month calling the deplorable conditions and pay ?slave labor.? Workers who subsequently died. ?I call on politicians to make every effort to relaunch the labor market,? said Pope Francis who went on to say that unemployment is, ?an economic conception of society based on selfish profit outside the bounds of social justice.? He also said, ?We do not get dignity from power or money or culture, no! We get dignity from work.? The Vatican has spoken against economic inequality throughout the economic collapse of recent years, and has been often very critical of unregulated capitalism and the harm it inflicts. http://tinyurl.com/d4vq8uf Where's the garment workers union when you need it? ==== Running a factory without making a profit apparently goes against god also because he will close it down in no time at all. Interesting that Harry should take such a sudden interest in the teachings of the pope. If there is no profit how is the church going to get its cut? |
#79
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Mon, 13 May 2013 16:29:33 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 5/13/2013 2:53 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: After hundreds of workers were killed in Bangladesh when the factory they worked at making clothes collapsed, Pope Francis took a moment during his May Day homily to pray for the victims and their families as well as condemn the labor practices that took their lives. ?How many brothers and sisters find themselves in this situation!? said the pontiff referring to the unfair and unsafe working conditions around the world. ?Not paying fairly, not giving a job because you are only looking at balance sheets, only looking at how to make a profit. That goes against God!? He couldn?t believe that the workers inside the factory were only making roughly 38 Euros ($50) per month calling the deplorable conditions and pay ?slave labor.? Workers who subsequently died. ?I call on politicians to make every effort to relaunch the labor market,? said Pope Francis who went on to say that unemployment is, ?an economic conception of society based on selfish profit outside the bounds of social justice.? He also said, ?We do not get dignity from power or money or culture, no! We get dignity from work.? The Vatican has spoken against economic inequality throughout the economic collapse of recent years, and has been often very critical of unregulated capitalism and the harm it inflicts. http://tinyurl.com/d4vq8uf Where's the garment workers union when you need it? ==== Running a factory without making a profit apparently goes against god also because he will close it down in no time at all. Interesting that Harry should take such a sudden interest in the teachings of the pope. If there is no profit how is the church going to get its cut? You're not kidding there, the church sure wants there share of grift. |
#80
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:23:58 -0400, wrote: Most of his life was devoted to crushing any competition and maintaining his monopoly. ==== And he was very good at that. Very very good. Greedy? Absolutely, but that was the driving force that made WINDOWS the most popular operating system of all time, and made PC technology and the internet accessible by virtually everyone regardlesss of technical expertise. No small accomplishment. It required brilliant vision, dedicated leadership and focus, not to mention a huge amount of work. Microsoft had to be pulled kicking and screaming to network their computers. Does anyone remember Novell. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Greed is why there is no hiring...Corporate Greed | General | |||
Greed is why there is no hiring...Corporate Greed | General | |||
Greed is why there is no hiring...Corporate Greed | General | |||
Greed is why there is no hiring...Corporate Greed | General | |||
Greed is why there is no hiring...Corporate Greed | General |