![]() |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/8/13 9:52 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 5/8/13 9:14 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 5/8/13 7:21 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 08 May 2013 14:31:58 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: If my car was in the driveway, I'd call the police and spent my time getting a good description of the perp. === There are other options of course. In my opinion a car thief is no better than a horse thief, and we all know what happens to them. It's telling that you are describing yourself as no better than a 19th Century vigilante. In the more civilized areas of the country, you aren't supposed to take the law into your own hands and hang some someone you caught stealing your car or lawn mower or whatever in your driveway. You're supposed to call the police and let them handle it. ---------------------------------------------- Someone comes up your driveway, proceeds to attempt to steal your car .... you are there witnessing this .... and all you would do is memorize what he looks like and call the police? That's right, and as soon as the cops arrive and take their report, I call my insurance agent. I'm not taking a chance the car thief will get violent. It's not a person, it's a car, an inanimate object that is easy to replace. ----------------------------------------- I just can't see myself watching this taking place without challenging the person. My reaction to the challenge depends on his. I might run or I might stand my ground. Sorta depends on how big he is. But I don't think I'd stand there calling 911 while I watched him in the process of stealing it and driving away. A challenge might be just enough to cause him to abort and screw. Ever been robbed? Had your house broken into and items taken? ****es you off. It's not the value of the items taken. Like you said, they can be replaced. It's the thought that some people think they can just help themselves to things that don't belong to them. Sometimes the items are not replaceable and unfortunately most of the time they are never recovered. You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:13:27 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact the attorneys involved and offer your testimony. If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure speculation. That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or FOX news! I am giving the defendant the benefit of the doubt and putting the burden of proof on the state, as it should be. You and Harry are the ones who have convinced yourselves that this was premeditated murder with no evidence to back it up. Corey is not even saying that. The thrust of her indictment was that Zimmerman had a depraved mind when he followed Martin but there is no real proof of that either. He had about 50 other incidents with similar circumstances with no violence involved at all. This would have been a non-issue if Martin had simply answered the question "What are you doing here" with something along the lines of "I am staying over there" but the indications from everything we know or have heard is that he answered that question with a punch in the face. If you know anything else, please tell us http://tinyurl.com/834nzb7 |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... On 5/8/2013 4:30 PM, wrote: On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:13:27 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact the attorneys involved and offer your testimony. If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure speculation. That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or FOX news! I am giving the defendant the benefit of the doubt and putting the burden of proof on the state, as it should be. You and Harry are the ones who have convinced yourselves that this was premeditated murder with no evidence to back it up. I call "bull****"... There is no way you believe that's the way they feel "just because they said it here"... They are just trolling you and will say whatever it takes to do that regardless of how they feel.. LOL! So Greg, on *you* I call bull****:) LOL! http://tinyurl.com/834nzb7 |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 5/8/13 9:52 PM, Eisboch wrote: I just can't see myself watching this taking place without challenging the person. My reaction to the challenge depends on his. I might run or I might stand my ground. Sorta depends on how big he is. But I don't think I'd stand there calling 911 while I watched him in the process of stealing it and driving away. A challenge might be just enough to cause him to abort and screw. Ever been robbed? Had your house broken into and items taken? ****es you off. It's not the value of the items taken. Like you said, they can be replaced. It's the thought that some people think they can just help themselves to things that don't belong to them. Sometimes the items are not replaceable and unfortunately most of the time they are never recovered. You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. ------------------------------------------ Yup, stupid as it may sound to you. I'd like to think I'd be aware and cautious of the situation but I've taken plenty of risks in my life, both physical and otherwise and have survived. I just don't think you can go through life being intimidated, controlled or even inconvenienced by those who break the law or think they are entitled to other people's personal possessions. Doesn't mean you become a vigilante but you *do* have a right and a certain amount of responsibility to protect yourself and your property. So, what would you do if you walked out of a store and witnessed someone keying your car (or any car for that matter) in the parking lot. Would you watch as he gouged scratches in the paint while dialing 911, afraid to confront him because he might be mean? Or witnessing a purse snatching when you could come to the victims aid by sticking out your foot and tripping him as he tried to run away? Not all confrontations end up in gun fight. But, it's nice to be prepared if they do. On that note (which I am sure will raise the ire of some) I recently discovered that the nanny state of Massachusetts is an "open carry" state. Well, technically it is because there are no state laws that prohibit open carry, other than on school or federal properties. You must have a LTC permit and all the other laws, rules and regulations apply but there's nothing in the statutes that prevent open carry in public. The way the state gets around this is to leave it up to the local police department Chief that issued your permit. If you open carry and someone complains to the police, the local Chief is likely to revoke your permit and confiscate your guns. That's what weird about gun laws in MA and several other states. The "right" to own, carry and use a gun exists in most, but under what conditions, restrictions and even the issuance of a permit is up to the individual town and city police departments Chiefs. This allows their personal views on private citizen gun ownership to influence their willingness to issue a LTC permit, what type (class A or B) and any arbitrary restrictions they want to apply. It's not governed by a uniform state law. Some are very pro-gun ownership. Some support even stronger gun control by simply deciding you don't need one. It all depends on what town or city you reside in. I recently was talking to a female who lives in a neighboring town. She applied for a LTC, waited almost 5 months while it was processed and was then issued a "Class A" LTC (concealed carry) *but* restrictions were put on it for "hunting and "range" use only" Who the heck uses a concealed handgun to go hunting? This doesn't seem right to me and obviously to others as evidenced by the number of lawsuits initiated by people who have been turned down. Ironically, the state is a "may issue" state for handgun permits, but a "shall issue" state for long guns which includes rifles, shotguns and the infamous "assault type" firearms. The long gun permits are in the form of a FID card, not a LTC. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 7:44 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. LOL, and again the story changes... Cool story bro! |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. --------------------------------------------- BTW, I think your use of the word "burglar" romanticizes those who seem to think they are entitled to take things that don't belong to them. They are what they are ... low life, thieving scum bags. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/13 9:40 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. --------------------------------------------- BTW, I think your use of the word "burglar" romanticizes those who seem to think they are entitled to take things that don't belong to them. They are what they are ... low life, thieving scum bags. Burglary typically is the name of the crime charged against burglars who are caught. According to Wiki, in your state of Massachusetts, "The Commonwealth of Massachusetts uses the term "burglary" to refer to a night-time breaking and entering of a dwelling with the intent to commit a felony. Burglary is a felony punishable by not more than twenty years; should the burglar enter with a dangerous weapon, they may be imprisoned for life. Unlawful entries of a structure other than a dwelling are labeled "breaking and entering" and punishments vary according to structure. I don't see the word "burglar" as romanticizing those who commit that crime. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/13 9:36 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/9/2013 7:44 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. LOL, and again the story changes... Cool story bro! Go eat some 'shrooms and conjure up some more offenses against you that never happened, little ****head. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging? Assault and battery Prove it. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint. Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me. He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck. You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the test in Md. You can't "stand your ground" My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other partner was also sent to the slammer. As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 12:04 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging? Assault and battery Prove it. Not to worry. It will be proven by those who matter. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 12:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint. Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me. He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck. You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the test in Md. You can't "stand your ground" My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other partner was also sent to the slammer. As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute. Take some names. You might need them. Snerk. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging? Assault and battery Prove it. That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not attacked. Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that Zimmerman started the fight. I get it. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging? Assault and battery Prove it. That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not attacked. Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that Zimmerman started the fight. I get it. AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging? Assault and battery Prove it. That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not attacked. redundant.... |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 12:36 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging? Assault and battery Prove it. That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not attacked. Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that Zimmerman started the fight. I get it. AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg? Just wondering... how many times are you guys going to answer the same five ridiculous inferences, from the same three idiots? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging? Assault and battery Prove it. That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not attacked. Where did you get that wild idea? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Thu, 9 May 2013 13:13:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
you either broke the law or you didn't! === If you think the law is all black and white like that, you've never seen a good defense attorney in action. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... On 5/9/2013 12:36 PM, Hank© wrote: On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging? Assault and battery Prove it. That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not attacked. Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that Zimmerman started the fight. I get it. AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg? Just wondering... how many times are you guys going to answer the same five ridiculous inferences, from the same three idiots? The only "idiot" here is you. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 12:15 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 5/9/2013 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot THE CROWBAR ATTACK WASN'T PART OF THE ORIGINAL STORY. IF HE WAS IN HIS TRUCK, COULDN'T HE HAVE SIMPLY DRIVEN OUT OF HARM'S WAY? That is a far cry from the original story..LOL! |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint. Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me. He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck. You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the test in Md. You can't "stand your ground" It was a harrytale. That's why it has changes so much over the years... |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/2013 12:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint. Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me. He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck. You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the test in Md. You can't "stand your ground" My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other partner was also sent to the slammer. HOLY ****!!! Twenty years for attacking a wall with a rolled up newspaper! Total bull****, even if he had a crowbar, which the imaginary perp, did not have... LOL! And the "accomplice" too, AND the girlfriend!!! You are soooo full of ****ing ****... As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:15 PM, Hank© wrote: On 5/9/2013 11:39 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. That is what got Martin shot THE CROWBAR ATTACK WASN'T PART OF THE ORIGINAL STORY. IF HE WAS IN HIS TRUCK, COULDN'T HE HAVE SIMPLY DRIVEN OUT OF HARM'S WAY? That is a far cry from the original story..LOL! Nope. Same. Shouldn't you be conjuring up another way you've been victimized here? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/13 2:54 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint. Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me. He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck. You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the test in Md. You can't "stand your ground" My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other partner was also sent to the slammer. HOLY ****!!! Twenty years for attacking a wall with a rolled up newspaper! Total bull****, even if he had a crowbar, which the imaginary perp, did not have... LOL! And the "accomplice" too, AND the girlfriend!!! You are soooo full of ****ing ****... Twenty years for perpetrating more than 100 home burglaries and for being in the drug trade, moron. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/13 2:51 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/9/2013 11:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint. But, but, but... harry did a nice piece of precision driving pinning the guy up against the wall, nicely centered with just enough pressure to hold him till the cops got there... Just like in the movies:) You don't get much of anything right. I couldn't pin the guy against the wall because his car was inside the garage. They broke into the house and then opened the garage door and parked inside so they could loot the house without being seen. I pinned the guy between the front bumper of my pickup truck and the rear bumper of his car. You should stick with your bull**** tales of being blackmailed, and your claims that your business client was contacted and, while you are at it, see if you can conjure up some more bull**** about your "racing team." |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint. Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me. He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck. You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the test in Md. You can't "stand your ground" My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other partner was also sent to the slammer. As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute. ------------------------------------------------------- I think Greg missed the point that your truck/burglar adventure occurred in Florida, not Maryland. I am curious if Florida had the "stand your ground" statute at the time this occurred. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/9/13 3:19 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/9/13 11:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I whacked him with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was threatening me physically. If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint. Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me. He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck. You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the test in Md. You can't "stand your ground" My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other partner was also sent to the slammer. As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute. ------------------------------------------------------- I think Greg missed the point that your truck/burglar adventure occurred in Florida, not Maryland. I am curious if Florida had the "stand your ground" statute at the time this occurred. I don't know one way or the other. I do know that even back then (mid 1990's) handguns were easy to get and it took no effort to get a carry permit, because their availability was advertised on TV. There was a local gunshop that advertised on TV. Southside Guns. The owner in those days was a flaming ass whose TV commercials glorified gun violence. The perp and his partner rented cheap apartments in town to store the merchandise they sold from houses and, I suppose, to have a place to "showcase" the wares to potential buyers. They used the cash proceeds to support their drug business. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com