BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/156942-those-here-following-zimmerman-martin-murder.html)

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 12:44 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/8/13 9:52 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 5/8/13 9:14 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 5/8/13 7:21 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 14:31:58 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

If my car was in the driveway, I'd call the police and spent my time
getting a good description of the perp.

===

There are other options of course. In my opinion a car thief is no
better than a horse thief, and we all know what happens to them.



It's telling that you are describing yourself as no better than a 19th
Century vigilante. In the more civilized areas of the country, you
aren't supposed to take the law into your own hands and hang some
someone you caught stealing your car or lawn mower or whatever in your
driveway. You're supposed to call the police and let them handle it.

----------------------------------------------

Someone comes up your driveway, proceeds to attempt to steal your car
.... you are there witnessing this .... and all you would do is
memorize what he looks like and call the police?


That's right, and as soon as the cops arrive and take their report, I
call my insurance agent. I'm not taking a chance the car thief will get
violent. It's not a person, it's a car, an inanimate object that is easy
to replace.

-----------------------------------------

I just can't see myself watching this taking place without challenging
the person. My reaction to the challenge depends on his. I might run
or I might stand my ground. Sorta depends on how big he is. But I don't
think I'd stand there calling 911 while I watched him in the process of
stealing it and driving away. A challenge might be just enough to
cause him to abort and screw.

Ever been robbed? Had your house broken into and items taken? ****es
you off. It's not the value of the items taken. Like you said, they
can be replaced. It's the thought that some people think they can just
help themselves to things that don't belong to them. Sometimes the items
are not replaceable and unfortunately most of the time they are never
recovered.



You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 01:42 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:14:48 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...


Fights can be initiated with words.

Not legally, particularly where you live.

If we are to believe the statement from the girl friend who was on the
phone at the time, the words were
"Why are you following me" (martin)
"What are you doing here" (Unknown person, to her, presumably
Zimmerman)
and the fight started.

Again, this was a representative of the HOA asking a stranger what he
was doing on private property. He could have, as easily, been a guy
from Wackenhut. I imagine Martin would have hit him too.

Would you ask someone what they were doing in your driveway if they
were looking into your car? Would you defend yourself if they knocked
you to the ground, broke your nose and banged your head on the
concrete? Evidence of those injuries is undisputed, the cops have
pictures.


If a man comes chases me because I'm walking at night and accosts me, he
certainly would be in for a fight!


So is the girlfriend lying?

She says Martin confronted Zimmerman


No she didn't. That's a lie.



iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 01:48 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:15:59 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 May 2013 15:02:23 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:45:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I believe Zimmerman initiated the fight and when it got out of hand, he
ran to his truck and got his pistol.

It is clear that you have not actually been paying much attention to
it then. That is inconsistent with every version of the story that is
out there. (The girl friend, the police and Zimmerman himself)

The police didn't see it, how could THEY make judgment? The girlfriend
said that the kid simply asked why Zimmerman was following him.
Zimmerman gave a lot of hearsay, but then he's a known liar.

If you keep going with the girl friends's story, Zimmerman asked "What
are you doing here" and the fight started.
Presumably Martin's answer to that question was a punch in the face.

The autopsy showed Martin had banged up fists and no other injuries
but a bullet hole in his chest. We have seen the pictures of
Zimmerman's face and the back of his head. I suppose you and Sharpton
can explain that another way but it sure sounds like a beating to me.


So, I guess that if a stranger comes running up to you in the middle of
the night, you'd just let him do whatever he wants to you? Hell yes, he
was fighting for his life, a thug had accosted him with a gun.


And you know Zimmerman ran up to martin how?


He SAID he was going to follow him, to which the sane dispatcher told
him he shouldn't.

How does that go?'
CITE?


HIS WORDS.

http://tinyurl.com/834nzb7

Notice, this:

Dispatcher: "Are you following him?"
Zimmerman: "Yeah"


Also, please note, not ONE WORD mentioning Martin "looking into cars" as
FOX has you believing.



iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 01:49 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:13:27 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...



If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact
the attorneys involved and offer your testimony.
If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure
speculation.


That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or
FOX news!


I am giving the defendant the benefit of the doubt and putting the
burden of proof on the state, as it should be. You and Harry are the
ones who have convinced yourselves that this was premeditated murder
with no evidence to back it up.

Corey is not even saying that. The thrust of her indictment was that
Zimmerman had a depraved mind when he followed Martin but there is no
real proof of that either.
He had about 50 other incidents with similar circumstances with no
violence involved at all.

This would have been a non-issue if Martin had simply answered the
question "What are you doing here" with something along the lines of
"I am staying over there" but the indications from everything we know
or have heard is that he answered that question with a punch in the
face.

If you know anything else, please tell us


http://tinyurl.com/834nzb7

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 01:49 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On 5/8/2013 4:30 PM,
wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:13:27 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...


If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact
the attorneys involved and offer your testimony.
If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure
speculation.

That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or
FOX news!


I am giving the defendant the benefit of the doubt and putting the
burden of proof on the state, as it should be. You and Harry are the
ones who have convinced yourselves that this was premeditated murder
with no evidence to back it up.


I call "bull****"... There is no way you believe that's the way they
feel "just because they said it here"... They are just trolling you and
will say whatever it takes to do that regardless of how they feel.. LOL!
So Greg, on *you* I call bull****:) LOL!


http://tinyurl.com/834nzb7

Eisboch[_8_] May 9th 13 02:28 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 5/8/13 9:52 PM, Eisboch wrote:


I just can't see myself watching this taking place without
challenging
the person. My reaction to the challenge depends on his. I might
run
or I might stand my ground. Sorta depends on how big he is. But I
don't
think I'd stand there calling 911 while I watched him in the process
of
stealing it and driving away. A challenge might be just enough to
cause him to abort and screw.

Ever been robbed? Had your house broken into and items taken?
****es
you off. It's not the value of the items taken. Like you said,
they
can be replaced. It's the thought that some people think they can
just
help themselves to things that don't belong to them. Sometimes the
items
are not replaceable and unfortunately most of the time they are
never
recovered.



You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida.
I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

------------------------------------------

Yup, stupid as it may sound to you. I'd like to think I'd be aware
and cautious of the situation but I've taken plenty of risks in my
life, both physical and otherwise and have survived. I just don't
think you can go through life being intimidated, controlled or even
inconvenienced by those who break the law or think they are entitled
to other people's personal possessions. Doesn't mean you become a
vigilante but you *do* have a right and a certain amount of
responsibility to protect yourself and your property.

So, what would you do if you walked out of a store and witnessed
someone keying your car (or any car for that matter) in the parking
lot. Would you watch as he gouged scratches in the paint while
dialing 911, afraid to confront him because he might be mean? Or
witnessing a purse snatching when you could come to the victims aid by
sticking out your foot and tripping him as he tried to run away?
Not all confrontations end up in gun fight. But, it's nice to be
prepared if they do.

On that note (which I am sure will raise the ire of some) I recently
discovered that the nanny state of Massachusetts is an "open carry"
state. Well, technically it is because there are no state laws that
prohibit open carry, other than on school or federal properties. You
must have a LTC permit and all the other laws, rules and regulations
apply but there's nothing in the statutes that prevent open carry in
public. The way the state gets around this is to leave it up to the
local police department Chief that issued your permit. If you open
carry and someone complains to the police, the local Chief is likely
to revoke your permit and confiscate your guns. That's what weird
about gun laws in MA and several other states. The "right" to own,
carry and use a gun exists in most, but under what conditions,
restrictions and even the issuance of a permit is up to the individual
town and city police departments Chiefs. This allows their personal
views on private citizen gun ownership to influence their willingness
to issue a LTC permit, what type (class A or B) and any arbitrary
restrictions they want to apply. It's not governed by a uniform state
law. Some are very pro-gun ownership. Some support even stronger gun
control by simply deciding you don't need one. It all depends on what
town or city you reside in. I recently was talking to a female who
lives in a neighboring town. She applied for a LTC, waited almost 5
months while it was processed and was then issued a "Class A" LTC
(concealed carry) *but* restrictions were put on it for "hunting
and "range" use only" Who the heck uses a concealed handgun to go
hunting?

This doesn't seem right to me and obviously to others as evidenced by
the number of lawsuits initiated by people who have been turned down.
Ironically, the state is a "may issue" state for handgun permits, but
a "shall issue" state for long guns which includes rifles, shotguns
and the infamous "assault type" firearms. The long gun permits are
in the form of a FID card, not a LTC.







JustWaitAFrekinMinute May 9th 13 02:36 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 7:44 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:




You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


LOL, and again the story changes... Cool story bro!

Eisboch[_8_] May 9th 13 02:40 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 



"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida.

---------------------------------------------

BTW, I think your use of the word "burglar" romanticizes those who
seem to think they are entitled to take things that don't belong to
them.

They are what they are ... low life, thieving scum bags.



F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 02:51 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 9:40 AM, Eisboch wrote:



"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida.

---------------------------------------------

BTW, I think your use of the word "burglar" romanticizes those who
seem to think they are entitled to take things that don't belong to them.

They are what they are ... low life, thieving scum bags.



Burglary typically is the name of the crime charged against burglars who
are caught. According to Wiki, in your state of Massachusetts, "The
Commonwealth of Massachusetts uses the term "burglary" to refer to a
night-time breaking and entering of a dwelling with the intent to commit
a felony. Burglary is a felony punishable by not more than twenty years;
should the burglar enter with a dangerous weapon, they may be imprisoned
for life. Unlawful entries of a structure other than a dwelling are
labeled "breaking and entering" and punishments vary according to structure.

I don't see the word "burglar" as romanticizing those who commit that
crime.

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 02:52 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 9:36 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/9/2013 7:44 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:




You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


LOL, and again the story changes... Cool story bro!



Go eat some 'shrooms and conjure up some more offenses against you that
never happened, little ****head.

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 02:55 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida.

---------------------------------------------

BTW, I think your use of the word "burglar" romanticizes those who
seem to think they are entitled to take things that don't belong to
them.

They are what they are ... low life, thieving scum bags.


Indeed!

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 04:51 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 04:54 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 11:48 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.


Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of
Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me.

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 05:04 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?


Assault and battery


Prove it.

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 05:09 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:48 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.


Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of
Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me.


He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck.

You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the
test in Md. You can't "stand your ground"


My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the
ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried,
convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and
got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other
partner was also sent to the slammer.

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.

Hank©[_2_] May 9th 13 05:15 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


That is what got Martin shot

THE CROWBAR ATTACK WASN'T PART OF THE ORIGINAL STORY. IF HE WAS IN HIS
TRUCK, COULDN'T HE HAVE SIMPLY DRIVEN OUT OF HARM'S WAY?

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 05:17 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


That is what got Martin shot


Cite?

Hank©[_2_] May 9th 13 05:17 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 12:04 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in
Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?


Assault and battery


Prove it.


Not to worry. It will be proven by those who matter.

Hank©[_2_] May 9th 13 05:20 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 12:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:48 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.


Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of
Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me.


He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck.

You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the
test in Md. You can't "stand your ground"


My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the
ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried,
convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and
got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other
partner was also sent to the slammer.

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.


Take some names. You might need them. Snerk.

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 05:20 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 08:42:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


If a man comes chases me because I'm walking at night and accosts me, he
certainly would be in for a fight!

So is the girlfriend lying?

She says Martin confronted Zimmerman


No she didn't. That's a lie.


OK what do you think she said


When Martin was cornered by a gun wielding assailant he asked him "Why
are you following me"? I'd have asked the same thing. She never, ever
said that Martin confronted Zimmerman. It's the other way around.

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 05:28 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:09:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.


That may not be all that comforting


I'm not concerned.

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 05:29 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.


That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that
Zimmerman started the fight. I get it.

Hank©[_2_] May 9th 13 05:36 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in
Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked
him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he
was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.


That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that
Zimmerman started the fight. I get it.


AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg?

JustWaitAFrekinMinute May 9th 13 06:12 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.


That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


redundant....

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 06:13 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:09:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.


That may not be all that comforting


You bet! For one thing, I don't like leaving things like that up to
someone's discretion, you either broke the law or you didn't!

JustWaitAFrekinMinute May 9th 13 06:14 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 12:36 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in
Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked
him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he
was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that
Zimmerman started the fight. I get it.


AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg?


Just wondering... how many times are you guys going to answer the same
five ridiculous inferences, from the same three idiots?

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 06:15 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.


That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Where did you get that wild idea?

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 06:15 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 12:20:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 08:42:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

If a man comes chases me because I'm walking at night and accosts me, he
certainly would be in for a fight!

So is the girlfriend lying?

She says Martin confronted Zimmerman

No she didn't. That's a lie.


OK what do you think she said


When Martin was cornered by a gun wielding assailant he asked him "Why
are you following me"? I'd have asked the same thing. She never, ever
said that Martin confronted Zimmerman. It's the other way around.


Martin did not know Zimmerman was armed. Prove otherwise.


Where did you get THAT wild idea?

Wayne B May 9th 13 06:38 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On Thu, 9 May 2013 13:13:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

you either broke the law or you didn't!


===

If you think the law is all black and white like that, you've never
seen a good defense attorney in action.

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 06:59 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On 5/9/2013 12:36 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in
Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked
him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he
was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that
Zimmerman started the fight. I get it.


AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg?


Just wondering... how many times are you guys going to answer the same
five ridiculous inferences, from the same three idiots?


The only "idiot" here is you.

iBoaterer[_3_] May 9th 13 07:34 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 13:13:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

you either broke the law or you didn't!


===

If you think the law is all black and white like that, you've never
seen a good defense attorney in action.


I didn't say that.

JustWaitAFrekinMinute May 9th 13 07:50 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 12:15 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 5/9/2013 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


That is what got Martin shot

THE CROWBAR ATTACK WASN'T PART OF THE ORIGINAL STORY. IF HE WAS IN HIS
TRUCK, COULDN'T HE HAVE SIMPLY DRIVEN OUT OF HARM'S WAY?


That is a far cry from the original story..LOL!

JustWaitAFrekinMinute May 9th 13 07:51 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 11:48 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.



But, but, but... harry did a nice piece of precision driving pinning the
guy up against the wall, nicely centered with just enough pressure to
hold him till the cops got there... Just like in the movies:)

JustWaitAFrekinMinute May 9th 13 07:52 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:48 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.


Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of
Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me.


He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck.

You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the
test in Md. You can't "stand your ground"


It was a harrytale. That's why it has changes so much over the years...

JustWaitAFrekinMinute May 9th 13 07:54 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/2013 12:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:48 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.


Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of
Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me.


He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck.

You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the
test in Md. You can't "stand your ground"


My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the
ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried,
convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and
got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other
partner was also sent to the slammer.


HOLY ****!!! Twenty years for attacking a wall with a rolled up
newspaper! Total bull****, even if he had a crowbar, which the
imaginary perp, did not have... LOL! And the "accomplice" too, AND the
girlfriend!!! You are soooo full of ****ing ****...

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.



F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 07:54 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:15 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 5/9/2013 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

THE CROWBAR ATTACK WASN'T PART OF THE ORIGINAL STORY. IF HE WAS IN HIS
TRUCK, COULDN'T HE HAVE SIMPLY DRIVEN OUT OF HARM'S WAY?


That is a far cry from the original story..LOL!


Nope. Same. Shouldn't you be conjuring up another way you've been
victimized here?

F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 08:00 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 2:54 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:48 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.


Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of
Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me.

He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck.

You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the
test in Md. You can't "stand your ground"


My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the
ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried,
convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and
got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other
partner was also sent to the slammer.


HOLY ****!!! Twenty years for attacking a wall with a rolled up
newspaper! Total bull****, even if he had a crowbar, which the
imaginary perp, did not have... LOL! And the "accomplice" too, AND the
girlfriend!!! You are soooo full of ****ing ****...


Twenty years for perpetrating more than 100 home burglaries and for
being in the drug trade, moron.



F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 08:04 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 2:51 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 5/9/2013 11:48 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.


If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.



But, but, but... harry did a nice piece of precision driving pinning the
guy up against the wall, nicely centered with just enough pressure to
hold him till the cops got there... Just like in the movies:)



You don't get much of anything right. I couldn't pin the guy against the
wall because his car was inside the garage. They broke into the house
and then opened the garage door and parked inside so they could loot the
house without being seen. I pinned the guy between the front bumper of
my pickup truck and the rear bumper of his car.

You should stick with your bull**** tales of being blackmailed, and your
claims that your business client was contacted and, while you are at it,
see if you can conjure up some more bull**** about your "racing team."



Eisboch[_8_] May 9th 13 08:19 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:48 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he
was
threatening me physically.

If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent
you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated
assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.


Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag
of
Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me.


He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck.

You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the
test in Md. You can't "stand your ground"


My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the
ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried,
convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and
got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other
partner was also sent to the slammer.

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house
at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.

-------------------------------------------------------

I think Greg missed the point that your truck/burglar adventure
occurred in Florida, not Maryland.
I am curious if Florida had the "stand your ground" statute at the
time this occurred.



F.O.A.D. May 9th 13 08:28 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/9/13 3:19 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 5/9/13 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:54:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:48 AM,
wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

If you were inside your truck you were not threatened. Your truck
might have been subject to damage. There was nothing to prevent you
from driving away.That sounds like you committed aggravated assault to
me. Good thing he didn't file a complaint.


Oh, I wasn't being threatened? Bull****. He wasn't carrying a bag of
Skittles and a soft drink when he came at me.


He also was not likely to be able to outrun your truck.

You were not exposed and you had the ability to retreat. That is the
test in Md. You can't "stand your ground"


My truck windows were open, and you have no idea whether I had the
ability to retreat safely. In any event, he was arrested, tried,
convicted and sentenced to 20 years. His girlfriend copped a plea and
got a much lesser sentence, but I don't recall what it was. His other
partner was also sent to the slammer.

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.

-------------------------------------------------------

I think Greg missed the point that your truck/burglar adventure occurred
in Florida, not Maryland.
I am curious if Florida had the "stand your ground" statute at the time
this occurred.



I don't know one way or the other. I do know that even back then (mid
1990's) handguns were easy to get and it took no effort to get a carry
permit, because their availability was advertised on TV. There was a
local gunshop that advertised on TV. Southside Guns. The owner in those
days was a flaming ass whose TV commercials glorified gun violence.

The perp and his partner rented cheap apartments in town to store the
merchandise they sold from houses and, I suppose, to have a place to
"showcase" the wares to potential buyers. They used the cash proceeds to
support their drug business.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com