|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/2/2013 1:19 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 1:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 02 May 2013 12:38:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. Walking slow in the rain, looking IN cars. (not AT cars). This was in a neighborhood that was plagued by auto burglaries. That's according to Zimmerman, who lied to the judge, too. Liars can't be trusted, can they, Harry? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:39:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 02 May 2013 12:38:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. Walking slow in the rain, looking IN cars. (not AT cars). This was in a neighborhood that was plagued by auto burglaries. Well then, it's settled, if you're walking in the rain, looking into cars while walking by them, you need to die. Got it. He died because he attacked Zimmerman Please show the proof of that wild allegation. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Thu, 02 May 2013 14:29:30 -0400, Hank© wrote:
On 5/2/2013 1:19 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 1:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 02 May 2013 12:38:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. Walking slow in the rain, looking IN cars. (not AT cars). This was in a neighborhood that was plagued by auto burglaries. That's according to Zimmerman, who lied to the judge, too. Liars can't be trusted, can they, Harry? That was really, really low. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article , says...
In article , says... On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:20:09 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person until the cops (that he called) showed up. He accosted an innocent person walking. I guess you were not paying attention to the girl friends's story. She said he was the one who spoke first (why are you following me). There is nothing illegal about following someone. Following is not accosting, that is all conjecture from people 1000+ miles from the scene. If you were being accosted, followed by a man with a gun, wouldn't you ask him why? How did Martin know that Zimmerman had a gun at that point? You keep glossing over the fact that Martin was caught with burglary tools and jewelry at school. So, that means to you that he's automatically guilty? What is your explanation for a 17 year old kid with a big screwdriver and a bag of women's jewelry? Gee, I never saw where he had a screwdriver and a bag of jewelry when Zimmerman accosted him. http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/201...ns-paint-more- complicated-picture-of-trayvon-martin-20120326_1_suspensions-jewelry-report He was a vandal and was only at his father's house in the first place because he was kicked out of school. I bet all of this, along with things we have not been told, will show up in the trial. O'mara will try to demonstrate that Martin was a thug and a trouble maker who attacked Zimmerman while he was returning to his truck. That is what Zimmerman has said and there is nobody to testify that it isn't true. You are simply buying Al Sharpton's spin on this and I am not exactly sure why. I'm not "buying" ANY spin. I'm waiting for the FACTS. YOU on the other hand, with FOX have him guilty without the benefit of trial. Why? Because it's easy when the kid is dead, FOX and the NRA think it's good to go killing kids because the APPEAR different and are looking for a scapegoat for hot headed Zimmerman. You let MSNBC and Al Sharpton convince you Zimmerman is guilty when all of the evidence appears to support his story. Why do you thin\k the state's attorney decided not to prosecute ... until political pressure from lobbyists in DC made them bring in a prosecutor who would try to make a case. That is mob rule, not justice. If this was a black guy who was charged you would call it a lynching. Bull****, I would say what it is, a vigilante with no justifiable cause other than the kid was walking with Skittles accosting him. The only reason thus far that HIS story is supported is because the victim is feakin' dead. Don't forget about the can of iced tea. Martin was a thug and junior criminal. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article om,
says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Sun, 5 May 2013 10:41:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? ========= OJ Simpson's lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran, once said that no jury has ever convicted an innocent man. Pushing that reasoning just a tad farther, I would posit that no innocent man has ever been shot. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/5/2013 11:21 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2013 10:41:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? ========= OJ Simpson's lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran, once said that no jury has ever convicted an innocent man. Pushing that reasoning just a tad farther, I would posit that no innocent man has ever been shot. With all due respect.. that's nuts... |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/5/2013 9:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. It's too bad that Trevon didn't know O'Bama was so fond of him. He might have sought refuge at the White House instead of the love nest. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says... On 5/5/2013 9:29 AM, BAR wrote: In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. It's too bad that Trevon didn't know O'Bama was so fond of him. He might have sought refuge at the White House instead of the love nest. And that's equally stupid. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/6/13 8:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m, hank57 @socialworker.net says... On 5/5/2013 9:29 AM, BAR wrote: In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. It's too bad that Trevon didn't know O'Bama was so fond of him. He might have sought refuge at the White House instead of the love nest. And that's equally stupid. "Hank" learned everything he knows scraping paint and swabbing out the heads on the U.S.S. NeverLeavesPort. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/6/2013 8:39 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/6/13 8:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, hank57 @socialworker.net says... On 5/5/2013 9:29 AM, BAR wrote: In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. It's too bad that Trevon didn't know O'Bama was so fond of him. He might have sought refuge at the White House instead of the love nest. And that's equally stupid. "Hank" learned everything he knows scraping paint and swabbing out the heads on the U.S.S. NeverLeavesPort. Wassamatta? Run out of cleverness? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article , says...
In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up with their guns and other guys. :) |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/2013 11:17 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up with their guns and other guys. :) Black guys love white chicks who are married to older gentlemen who can't perform anymore. ;-) |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. Bingo! I know who the little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood are. So you're going to kill them? And what about a stranger in your neighborhood, how would you know that HE was a "hoodlum"? An awful lot has been said right here in rec.boats that the kid had a "past". How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article om, hank57
@socialworker.net says... On 5/7/2013 1:35 PM, wrote: On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. Was it profiling or common sense that drew Zimms attention to the young fella peering into car windows. Common bigotry. It's the right wing way! |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/13 2:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. Bingo! I know who the little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood are. So you're going to kill them? And what about a stranger in your neighborhood, how would you know that HE was a "hoodlum"? An awful lot has been said right here in rec.boats that the kid had a "past". How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? Zimmerman was the one with the past, with several incompletely prosecuted incidents of violence, including one against a woman. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article , says...
In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. So he should die, eh? He died as a result of an altercation with an armed citizen. Martin thought he was going to beat down some guy and he ended up dying for his efforts. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article , says...
In article om, hank57 @socialworker.net says... On 5/7/2013 1:35 PM, wrote: On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. Was it profiling or common sense that drew Zimms attention to the young fella peering into car windows. Common bigotry. It's the right wing way! Zimmerman is a registered Democrat. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article , says...
In article , says... In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. Bingo! I know who the little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood are. So you're going to kill them? And what about a stranger in your neighborhood, how would you know that HE was a "hoodlum"? An awful lot has been said right here in rec.boats that the kid had a "past". How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? No, I never said that. I said I know who the little ******* hoodlums are in my neighborhood. If I see little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood that I don't know I would follow them and make sure that they aren't stealing from me or my neighbors. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/13 6:24 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. There's no evidence the young man was doing anything other than talking on a cell phone and carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Zimmerman, on the other hand, has a recorded history of violence. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:50:04 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
Was it profiling or common sense that drew Zimms attention to the young fella peering into car windows. Common bigotry. It's the right wing way! ==== I disagree with that. I have called the cops on white kids who were acting in exactly the same way. Suspicious behavior is what it is and totally color blind. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/2013 6:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/7/13 6:24 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. There's no evidence the young man was doing anything other than talking on a cell phone and carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Zimmerman, on the other hand, has a recorded history of violence. And so the kid's "history of violence" is hidden by the law, seems it couldn't hide from lady justice... |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/2013 5:06 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. So he should die, eh? He died as a result of an altercation with an armed citizen. Martin thought he was going to beat down some guy and he ended up dying for his efforts. Yup... |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 2:15:18 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. So he should die, eh? Nah, and I never said that. You know that. I just showed you how the aforementioned info (that you questioned) was relevant. There is no doubt it will be explored in court. He died because when he confronted Zimmerman, he attacked him instead of saying "I'm headed down to Miss XX's house, where my dad is shacking up with her, and I'm visiting". That was an unfortunate choice, and ended up costing him his life. Meeting a question with force isn't always the best answer. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On May 8, 12:45*am, wrote:
At this point we should just let the court decide this. That's what I've been saying all along. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/8/13 7:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On May 8, 12:45 am, wrote: At this point we should just let the court decide this. That's what I've been saying all along. Might be a more fair trial if it were held in a state not so gun crazy. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com