|
Ethanol?
|
Ethanol?
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:23:23 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote: Maybe if the right wouldn't be SO afraid of new technology, we could move forward and make engines that would be just fine on ethanol. === That would be the wrong direction. Ethanol is not a good fuel for all the reasons previously mentioned: 1. It is inefficient - takes more net energy to produce than it yields as an engine fuel. 2. Wastes cropland and other agricultural resources. 3. Drives up the federal defecit via farm subsidies. 4. Raises the cost of food and decreases food supplies. The only people who like ethanol are the farmers and they are lobbying hard for E15. It's time to stop this nonsense. The wave of the future for engine fuels is natural gas. We've got tons of it, supplys are growing, and it is inexpensive and clean burning. Major trucking companies are already starting to convert and the railroads are not far behind. Once the infrastructure for distribution and sales are in place, light trucks and passenger vehicles will be next in line. |
Ethanol?
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... Maybe if the right wouldn't be SO afraid of new technology, we could move forward and make engines that would be just fine on ethanol. ------------------------------------------------------- That's not the problem. The problem is that ethanol was forced upon the industry and public even when testing indicated that many existing fuel delivery systems would be adversely affected by it. The last boat I bought had one year old, USCG approved fuel lines that were perfectly fine but the survey revealed that they should be replaced with a newer, ethanol resistant type. Not an easy or inexpensive task on a twin engine boat with fuel tanks located in an almost inaccessible location. At least one major boat manufacturer had to recall all their boats when it was found that ethanol laced fuel was dissolving the resin used to make fiberglass fuel tanks that were an integral part of the boat's molded design. The resin was carried into the engine's fuel delivery system, totally screwing up the fuel injectors. More newer car engines require high octane premium fuel in order to get full performance without having the engine sensors retard timing, thanks to ethanol. It was a bad idea then and now the government wants to make it even worse. |
Ethanol?
On Apr 26, 7:57*am, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/26/13 7:54 AM, True North wrote: On Friday, 26 April 2013 04:11:25 UTC-3, *e#c *wrote: On Apr 25, 10:21 pm, True North wrote: On Thursday, 25 April 2013 23:09:33 UTC-3, *e#c *wrote: On Apr 25, 6:25 pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote: My heretofore trusty Honda lawnmower wouldn't start earlier this week. It's 10 years old and I only use it for trim work. Over the winter, I run it dry with Sta-bil blue (marine). Unfortunately, I forgot to drain the carb bowl. Everything else seemed ok on the Honda motor, so I pulled the carb to see what was going on. What was going on was heavy duty "white" corrosion of some sort. Never seen anything like it before. Valleys etched into the walls of the carb. So, I took the carb up to a local lawn equipment dealer and the parts guy said, "That's ethanol 'corrosion' on aluminum...your carb is ruined." He ordered a new carb and gasket for me, it came in today, I installed it and the motor started right up. In the past, I've posted I didn't have any "ethanol problems." Well, I had a $50 (cost of carb) problem this week. Next fall, I'll remember to drain the damned carb bowl. Grrrr. No one cares....... * You should, dummy. Since we seem to copy the 'mericans on everything... but are usually 10 years behind, ethanol could be in our future. Only in yours ass****, as short as it will be...... Why would my life be short, dummy. You're the one with mechanical parts keeping him above ground. One little malfunction and...fade to black..... That mophead of sheep's hair is something else... Compared to your bald-in-the-middle pate? I'll take my hair, ass****...LMAO !!!!! |
Ethanol?
On Apr 26, 7:54*am, True North wrote:
On Friday, 26 April 2013 04:11:25 UTC-3, *e#c *wrote: On Apr 25, 10:21*pm, True North wrote: On Thursday, 25 April 2013 23:09:33 UTC-3, *e#c *wrote: On Apr 25, 6:25*pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote: My heretofore trusty Honda lawnmower wouldn't start earlier this week. It's 10 years old and I only use it for trim work. Over the winter, I run it dry with Sta-bil blue (marine). Unfortunately, I forgot to drain the carb bowl. Everything else seemed ok on the Honda motor, so I pulled the carb to see what was going on. What was going on was heavy duty "white" corrosion of some sort. Never seen anything like it before. Valleys etched into the walls of the carb. So, I took the carb up to a local lawn equipment dealer and the parts guy said, "That's ethanol 'corrosion' on aluminum...your carb is ruined." He ordered a new carb and gasket for me, it came in today, I installed it and the motor started right up. In the past, I've posted I didn't have any "ethanol problems." Well, I had a $50 (cost of carb) problem this week. Next fall, I'll remember to drain the damned carb bowl. Grrrr. No one cares....... *You should, dummy. Since we seem to copy the 'mericans on everything... but are usually 10 years behind, ethanol could be in our future. Only in yours ass****, as short as it will be...... Why would my life be short, dummy. You're the one with mechanical parts keeping him above ground. One little malfunction and...fade to black..... Certainly not before you're " faded to black " |
Ethanol?
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... Maybe if the right wouldn't be SO afraid of new technology, we could move forward and make engines that would be just fine on ethanol. ------------------------------------------------------- That's not the problem. The problem is that ethanol was forced upon the industry and public even when testing indicated that many existing fuel delivery systems would be adversely affected by it. The last boat I bought had one year old, USCG approved fuel lines that were perfectly fine but the survey revealed that they should be replaced with a newer, ethanol resistant type. Not an easy or inexpensive task on a twin engine boat with fuel tanks located in an almost inaccessible location. At least one major boat manufacturer had to recall all their boats when it was found that ethanol laced fuel was dissolving the resin used to make fiberglass fuel tanks that were an integral part of the boat's molded design. The resin was carried into the engine's fuel delivery system, totally screwing up the fuel injectors. More newer car engines require high octane premium fuel in order to get full performance without having the engine sensors retard timing, thanks to ethanol. It was a bad idea then and now the government wants to make it even worse. ----------------------------------------------------- I'd add that AVGAS (gasoline produced for use in aircraft .. typically private planes) does *not* contain ethanol by law. There's a reason for it. |
Ethanol?
In article ,
says... On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:23:23 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Maybe if the right wouldn't be SO afraid of new technology, we could move forward and make engines that would be just fine on ethanol. === That would be the wrong direction. Ethanol is not a good fuel for all the reasons previously mentioned: 1. It is inefficient - takes more net energy to produce than it yields as an engine fuel. At the moment, just maybe-sort-of. When gasoline was in it's infancy, the exact same was true. http://tinyurl.com/bqubef4 2. Wastes cropland and other agricultural resources. How does it waste cropland if the cropland is being used instead of the government paying farmers to let it go fallow? 3. Drives up the federal defecit via farm subsidies. Again, the government is in the farm business already, in some cases paying farmers to NOT grow crops. 4. Raises the cost of food and decreases food supplies. Maybe. Here's a really good read: http://tinyurl.com/o6ws4e |
Ethanol?
In article ,
says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... Maybe if the right wouldn't be SO afraid of new technology, we could move forward and make engines that would be just fine on ethanol. ------------------------------------------------------- That's not the problem. The problem is that ethanol was forced upon the industry and public even when testing indicated that many existing fuel delivery systems would be adversely affected by it. The last boat I bought had one year old, USCG approved fuel lines that were perfectly fine but the survey revealed that they should be replaced with a newer, ethanol resistant type. Not an easy or inexpensive task on a twin engine boat with fuel tanks located in an almost inaccessible location. At least one major boat manufacturer had to recall all their boats when it was found that ethanol laced fuel was dissolving the resin used to make fiberglass fuel tanks that were an integral part of the boat's molded design. The resin was carried into the engine's fuel delivery system, totally screwing up the fuel injectors. More newer car engines require high octane premium fuel in order to get full performance without having the engine sensors retard timing, thanks to ethanol. It was a bad idea then and now the government wants to make it even worse. http://tinyurl.com/o6ws4e |
Ethanol?
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com