Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.

On 4/25/13 7:17 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:46:45 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/25/13 12:30 AM,
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:36:28 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Where does the 1st amendment say can't allow people to express their
faith on government property?
The congress is not making any law about it.
I have said before they can't favor one over another.
That was the basis for McLeary County
I can understand if they limited it to "free speech" zones that anyone
could use but that might actually be the show stopper if the
particular government did not want to allow other religions to display
their faith.



You're going way off into "tangent land." It's perfectly OK for, say, a
kid in a public school to say a prayer if he or she wants prior to
taking a test or whatever. It is NOT ok for the classroom teacher to
lead such a prayer.

An individual saying a prayer has nothing to do with any religious group
putting up a creche in the front yard of the public school, which should
not be allowed.

It's interesting to me that in this country, it is only christians for
the most part who seem most eager to push their religious beliefs onto
society as a whole through legislation, and who talk about America as a
"christian" nation. I wonder if it is because these sorts of christians
really have doubts about their beliefs and try to find security in
forcing others to believe as they do.


As long as it is OK for the government to use my tax money to build
stadiums for privately owned and operated sports franchises that I
have no interest in, I think they should be allowed to let religious
people use a little corner of a public park for their passion.


Well, I don't think it is appropriate for governments to be subsidizing
privately owned sports franchises in any way, and especially should not
be building or remodeling sports stadiums for the billionaires who own
the teams.


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 569
Default Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.

On 4/25/2013 7:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/25/13 7:17 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:46:45 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/25/13 12:30 AM,
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:36:28 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Where does the 1st amendment say can't allow people to express their
faith on government property?
The congress is not making any law about it.
I have said before they can't favor one over another.
That was the basis for McLeary County
I can understand if they limited it to "free speech" zones that anyone
could use but that might actually be the show stopper if the
particular government did not want to allow other religions to display
their faith.



You're going way off into "tangent land." It's perfectly OK for, say, a
kid in a public school to say a prayer if he or she wants prior to
taking a test or whatever. It is NOT ok for the classroom teacher to
lead such a prayer.

An individual saying a prayer has nothing to do with any religious group
putting up a creche in the front yard of the public school, which should
not be allowed.

It's interesting to me that in this country, it is only christians for
the most part who seem most eager to push their religious beliefs onto
society as a whole through legislation, and who talk about America as a
"christian" nation. I wonder if it is because these sorts of christians
really have doubts about their beliefs and try to find security in
forcing others to believe as they do.


As long as it is OK for the government to use my tax money to build
stadiums for privately owned and operated sports franchises that I
have no interest in, I think they should be allowed to let religious
people use a little corner of a public park for their passion.


Well, I don't think it is appropriate for governments to be subsidizing
privately owned sports franchises in any way, and especially should not
be building or remodeling sports stadiums for the billionaires who own
the teams.


How about privately own farms, manufacturing entities, special
interests, foreign countries, congressmens pet airports?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Palin's movie is bombing X-Man[_2_] General 8 July 29th 11 09:09 PM
r_Hunt_19_HMS Active in Boston Harbor, 19 July 1773, The Boston Tea Party is five months in the future_sqs squeegees Tall Ship Photos 0 October 14th 10 02:15 PM
HMS Active in Boston Harbor, 19 July 1773, The Boston Tea Party is five months in the future_Geoff Hunt, 1990_sqs squeegees Tall Ship Photos 0 August 10th 09 01:45 AM
J Ganz carpet bombing Bobspirt ASA 10 July 29th 04 05:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017