On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:55:16 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

If you want to make the constitution the law of
the land, so be it.


===

The constitution *is* the law of the land and the people who wrote it
were a lot smarter than some of today's wannabe interpreters.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:55:16 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

If you want to make the constitution the law of
the land, so be it.


===

The constitution *is* the law of the land and the people who wrote it
were a lot smarter than some of today's wannabe interpreters.

I wholeheartedly agree! Therefore, you can't cherry pick which passages
you want upheld because you want them upheld, and deny the ones you want
to deny.

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:55:16 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

If you want to make the constitution the law of
the land, so be it.


===

The constitution *is* the law of the land and the people who wrote it
were a lot smarter than some of today's wannabe interpreters.

I wholeheartedly agree! Therefore, you can't cherry pick which passages
you want upheld because you want them upheld, and deny the ones you want
to deny.

Which ones are those who are not of your vien of thought not wanting to ensure?