Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On 4/24/2013 9:13 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 9:02 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/24/2013 8:57 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 8:51 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/24/2013 8:45 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/24/2013 8:23 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 8:20 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/23/2013 10:02 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:29:06 -0400, wrote:

As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the
diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan
display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put
yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you
lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you
would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

including your own beliefs, was
merely tolerated if at all. Much of this debate started in the
NYC
suburbs that have a very significant Jewish population. They
rightfully took offense at being surrounded by Christian religious
symbols, especially those on government property.


They really didn't "take offense" to the baby Jesus, it's only
fringe
groups and liars that say they are "offended" by a couple of
crossed
pieces of wood...

Ahh, now the uneducated, ignorant PsychoSnotty speaks for Jews.

Ah, the hateful bigoted Hitler wanna' be speaks for the
progressives...

I am a progressive. You are not a Jew.


Are you sure about that? What a bigot. Lucky you are a progressive, the
willfully ignorant here will back you up...

I am sure I am a progressive. I am sure you are not a Jew.

Idiot...


Really? Virtually all the Jews I know live their lives in ways that
ensures their children succeed in school and are highly educated. If you
were Jewish, you would be the odd Jew out.


What a bigoted asshole... But it's ok, the willfully ignorant here will
still support you...

What is bigoted about his above remark? And your stupid surmise about
"willfully ignorant" is just stupid. All that you know is what FOX spoon
feeds you and you call others willfully ignorant because they want the
country to move FORWARD in economics, technology, etc?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On 4/24/2013 8:56 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.


And I think it's bull****... We had Christian and Jewish symbols all of
my life in school... Even Kwanza after they invented it. And no kid is
"offended" by a shiny tree or the Menorah, honest adults aren't
either... unless they are already bigoted and predetermined to hate...

Would you or others have been "offended" if someone had put a pagan
symbol beside your cross on the wall? I'll bet so.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/13 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/24/2013 8:56 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.


And I think it's bull****... We had Christian and Jewish symbols all of
my life in school... Even Kwanza after they invented it. And no kid is
"offended" by a shiny tree or the Menorah, honest adults aren't
either... unless they are already bigoted and predetermined to hate...

Would you or others have been "offended" if someone had put a pagan
symbol beside your cross on the wall? I'll bet so.



My guess is that PsychoSnotty spent most of his school days in
detention, and the only thing in the room was the blackboard on which he
had to write 100 times a day, "I will stop behaving like a horse's ass."

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/2013 10:01 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/24/2013 8:56 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you
lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.


And I think it's bull****... We had Christian and Jewish symbols all of
my life in school... Even Kwanza after they invented it. And no kid is
"offended" by a shiny tree or the Menorah, honest adults aren't
either... unless they are already bigoted and predetermined to hate...

Would you or others have been "offended" if someone had put a pagan
symbol beside your cross on the wall? I'll bet so.

If it was an obvious attempt to mock my free speech, but those with no
moral core wouldn't see it that way. I noted before, post your symbols,
on your holidays, but mocking and bullying is not ok.



My guess is that PsychoSnotty spent most of his school days in
detention, and the only thing in the room was the blackboard on which he
had to write 100 times a day, "I will stop behaving like a horse's ass."



Projecting again harry...

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On 4/24/2013 8:56 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.


And I think it's bull****... We had Christian and Jewish symbols all of
my life in school... Even Kwanza after they invented it. And no kid is
"offended" by a shiny tree or the Menorah, honest adults aren't
either... unless they are already bigoted and predetermined to hate...

Cool story, bro!

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

I thought Snottie wasn't allowed in the public schools, probably due to behaviour problems, and had to be 'home schooled'.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On 4/24/13 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/24/2013 8:56 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.


And I think it's bull****... We had Christian and Jewish symbols all of
my life in school... Even Kwanza after they invented it. And no kid is
"offended" by a shiny tree or the Menorah, honest adults aren't
either... unless they are already bigoted and predetermined to hate...

Would you or others have been "offended" if someone had put a pagan
symbol beside your cross on the wall? I'll bet so.



My guess is that PsychoSnotty spent most of his school days in
detention, and the only thing in the room was the blackboard on which he
had to write 100 times a day, "I will stop behaving like a horse's ass."

It's a shame he isn't employable or just too lazy to get a job and
support his family in a decent style.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/23/2013 5:29 PM, wrote:


As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.


That's fine... and we won't mock them on Halloween, and they don't mock
us on Christmas. It's not the Christians trying to stop others free
speech, that only seems to go in one direction...

Really?

http://tinyurl.com/ao94hkr

http://tinyurl.com/bcf2ty9

http://tinyurl.com/axkrq9j


It is like the boycott of Chik Fil A, Whole Foods and Walmart isn't
it?

I am not sure how effective boycotts are but they are non-violent,
legal ways to protest.

I agree.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:57 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.

I find it interesting that the left extols the virtue of exposing
children to diversity and alternate lifestyles but, somehow trying to
tolerate religious diversity is evil.

No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll
tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so
means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!

They don't seem to understand the difference between tolerance and
"establishment"

If a government advanced one religion to the exclusion of all others,
that is clearly unconstitutional but if they allow the exercise of any
of them it is complying with the actual words on the page.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll
tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so
means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!

Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll
tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so
means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!

Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.

Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!!

Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the
priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death. Such evil
must be purged from Israel. (Deuteronomy 17:12 NLT)

You should not let a sorceress live. (Exodus 22:17 NAB)

If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to
death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives.
(Leviticus 20:13 NAB)

A man or a woman who acts as a medium or fortuneteller shall be put to
death by stoning; they have no one but themselves to blame for their
death. (Leviticus 20:27 NAB)

If a man commits adultery with another man's wife, both the man and the
woman must be put to death. (Leviticus 20:10 NLT)

A priest's daughter who loses her honor by committing fornication and
thereby dishonors her father also, shall be burned to death. (Leviticus
21:9 NAB)

Whoever sacrifices to any god, except the Lord alone, shall be doomed.
(Exodus 22:19 NAB)

They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers,
with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord,
the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great,
whether man or woman. (2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB)

Suppose you hear in one of the towns the LORD your God is giving you
that some worthless rabble among you have led their fellow citizens
astray by encouraging them to worship foreign gods. In such cases, you
must examine the facts carefully. If you find it is true and can prove
that such a detestable act has occurred among you, you must attack that
town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the
livestock. (Deuteronomy 13:13-19 NLT)

If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife,
or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods, whom
you and your fathers have not known, gods of any other nations, near at
hand or far away, from one end of the earth to the other: do not yield
to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or shield
him, but kill him. (Deuteronomy 13:7-12 NAB)

Make ready to slaughter his sons for the guilt of their fathers; Lest
they rise and posses the earth, and fill the breadth of the world with
tyrants. (Isaiah 14:21 NAB)

Cursed be he who does the Lords work remissly, cursed he who holds back
his sword from blood. (Jeremiah 48:10 NAB)

Though there are no verses in the New Testament that advocate the
killing of non-believers.

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and
hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that
curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which
despitefully use you, and persecute you; (Matthew 5:43-44 KJV)

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:15:00 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll

tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so

means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!



Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.



Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!!

Cite me the last time someone was stoned to death by Christians in the US. Or anywhere on the globe.

Muslims stoned Christians in Dearborn last year.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/2013 12:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/23/2013 5:29 PM, wrote:


As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.


That's fine... and we won't mock them on Halloween, and they don't mock
us on Christmas. It's not the Christians trying to stop others free
speech, that only seems to go in one direction...

Really?

http://tinyurl.com/ao94hkr

http://tinyurl.com/bcf2ty9

http://tinyurl.com/axkrq9j


It is like the boycott of Chik Fil A, Whole Foods and Walmart isn't
it?

I am not sure how effective boycotts are but they are non-violent,
legal ways to protest.


There is a big difference between mocking and political speech... Was
that kevin posting those apples to our discussion of oranges, sounds
like him?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/2013 12:29 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:57 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.

I find it interesting that the left extols the virtue of exposing
children to diversity and alternate lifestyles but, somehow trying to
tolerate religious diversity is evil.

They don't seem to understand the difference between tolerance and
"establishment"

If a government advanced one religion to the exclusion of all others,
that is clearly unconstitutional but if they allow the exercise of any
of them it is complying with the actual words on the page.


They understand just fine, they are just selfish, unreasonable people
just like krausie boy...

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/2013 2:05 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll
tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so
means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!

Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.


That was kevin you were addressing, he just can't keep up so he makes it
up as he goes along...

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/13 5:26 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/24/2013 12:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/23/2013 5:29 PM, wrote:


As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.


That's fine... and we won't mock them on Halloween, and they don't mock
us on Christmas. It's not the Christians trying to stop others free
speech, that only seems to go in one direction...

Really?

http://tinyurl.com/ao94hkr

http://tinyurl.com/bcf2ty9

http://tinyurl.com/axkrq9j


It is like the boycott of Chik Fil A, Whole Foods and Walmart isn't
it?

I am not sure how effective boycotts are but they are non-violent,
legal ways to protest.


There is a big difference between mocking and political speech... Was
that kevin posting those apples to our discussion of oranges, sounds
like him?


I love this quote from the second URL:

"Whether you call it a boycott or simply a determination that you are
not going to support companies which are anti-Christ, you do have a
Christian responsibility in this arena. You need to be aware of where
your resources are going and what they are supporting. And you need to
make a positive decision that you are going to support the things that
serve to accomplish the purposes of God."

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/13 12:29 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:57 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.

I find it interesting that the left extols the virtue of exposing
children to diversity and alternate lifestyles but, somehow trying to
tolerate religious diversity is evil.

They don't seem to understand the difference between tolerance and
"establishment"

If a government advanced one religion to the exclusion of all others,
that is clearly unconstitutional but if they allow the exercise of any
of them it is complying with the actual words on the page.



I don't see where "the government" is allowing or disallowing the
exercise of religion. What is not and should not be allowable is the
exercise of religion on the public's property, and the exercise of
religion includes manger scenes that allegedly depict the birth of the
Jewish fellow the Christians call Jesus.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/2013 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:15:00 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll

tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so

means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!



Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.



Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!!

Cite me the last time someone was stoned to death by Christians in the US. Or anywhere on the globe.

Muslims stoned Christians in Dearborn last year.


You are arguing with kevin/plum/boater/so many others... anyway, he will
say whatever it takes to get you to fight with him, even if it makes no
sense at all. Some kind of mental damage, he enjoys the negative
attention almost as much as our resident asshat... krause.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/13 5:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/24/2013 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:15:00 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll

tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to
do so

means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!



Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the
time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer
happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.



Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!!

Cite me the last time someone was stoned to death by Christians in the
US. Or anywhere on the globe.

Muslims stoned Christians in Dearborn last year.


You are arguing with kevin/plum/boater/so many others... anyway, he will
say whatever it takes to get you to fight with him, even if it makes no
sense at all. Some kind of mental damage, he enjoys the negative
attention almost as much as our resident asshat... krause.


The christians in this country don't need to stone muslims to death. Our
christians have small arms, artillery, rockets, bombs, and so on and so
forth. Why use stones when you can kill from a distance.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/2013 5:40 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 5:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/24/2013 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:15:00 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian,
they'll

tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to
do so

means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!



Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the
time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer
happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.



Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!!

Cite me the last time someone was stoned to death by Christians in the
US. Or anywhere on the globe.

Muslims stoned Christians in Dearborn last year.


You are arguing with kevin/plum/boater/so many others... anyway, he will
say whatever it takes to get you to fight with him, even if it makes no
sense at all. Some kind of mental damage, he enjoys the negative
attention almost as much as our resident asshat... krause.


The christians in this country don't need to stone muslims to death. Our
christians have small arms, artillery, rockets, bombs, and so on and so
forth. Why use stones when you can kill from a distance.

Is that why you are honeing your shooting skills at 25 yards?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:40:07 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 5:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

On 4/24/2013 4:22 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:15:00 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:







No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll



tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to

do so



means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!







Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the

time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer

happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.







Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!!



Cite me the last time someone was stoned to death by Christians in the

US. Or anywhere on the globe.



Muslims stoned Christians in Dearborn last year.





You are arguing with kevin/plum/boater/so many others... anyway, he will

say whatever it takes to get you to fight with him, even if it makes no

sense at all. Some kind of mental damage, he enjoys the negative

attention almost as much as our resident asshat... krause.





The christians in this country don't need to stone muslims to death. Our

christians have small arms, artillery, rockets, bombs, and so on and so

forth. Why use stones when you can kill from a distance.

But the military (of which you speak), that is comprised of all manner of religious and non-religious folk, are ultimately commanded by our POTUS. What religion is he, and what are his motives?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:29:22 PM UTC-4, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 4/24/2013 2:05 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll

tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so

means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!



Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time.. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.





That was kevin you were addressing, he just can't keep up so he makes it

up as he goes along...

Whomever he is, he forgets two important things... that there is no Christian church that actively preaches and condones that scripture he googled from some Christian-hating site, and "Thou shalt not kill". I seem to remember that being one of the ten commandment.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:46:53 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.

=====

There's a big difference between being a so called "progressive" and
having a significant personality disorder.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.


I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in
their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in
public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs
on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the
public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are
destroying the concept of America.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/13 7:53 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:46:53 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.

=====

There's a big difference between being a so called "progressive" and
having a significant personality disorder.


You've been diagnosed, eh?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

True North wrote:
I thought Snottie wasn't allowed in the public schools, probably due to behaviour problems, and had to be 'home schooled'.
Why would you think that and what post are you responding to?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:14:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.


I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in
their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in
public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs
on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the
public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are
destroying the concept of America.

===============

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/13 8:26 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:14:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.


I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in
their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in
public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs
on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the
public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are
destroying the concept of America.

===============

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.


It isn't inappropriate to state clearly what I don't like about "the
religious." I don't give a damn what they do in their houses of worship,
or their homes, or even in their speeches or published papers.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 8:14:09 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:



On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not

from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written

essays edited over the centuries.



===



It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of

others no matter how much you may disagree with them.



Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we

all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of

it themselves.





I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in

their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in

public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs

on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the

public's facilities to further their beliefs.

Funny. That's exactly what *every* special interest group does, but I only seems to bother you when it's Christians. Why is that?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/2013 8:23 PM, Earl wrote:
True North wrote:
I thought Snottie wasn't allowed in the public schools, probably due
to behaviour problems, and had to be 'home schooled'.
Why would you think that and what post are you responding to?

He only said it because he is a cowardly little slob.. I wonder if his
wife got those rabies shots yet? The old whore spent the last few
weekends downtown paying for donnies' beer...

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 22:11:23 UTC-3, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 4/24/2013 8:23 PM, Earl wrote:

True North wrote:

I thought Snottie wasn't allowed in the public schools, probably due

to behaviour problems, and had to be 'home schooled'.

Why would you think that and what post are you responding to?



He only said it because he is a cowardly little slob.. I wonder if his

wife got those rabies shots yet? The old whore spent the last few

weekends downtown paying for donnies' beer...

There you go again... cementing your reputation as a miserable, nasty, low life, who delights in attacking other poster's innocent family members.
If you only would man-up and put the same effort into finding a real job....

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/24/2013 10:20 PM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 22:11:23 UTC-3, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 4/24/2013 8:23 PM, Earl wrote:

True North wrote:

I thought Snottie wasn't allowed in the public schools, probably due

to behaviour problems, and had to be 'home schooled'.

Why would you think that and what post are you responding to?



He only said it because he is a cowardly little slob.. I wonder if his

wife got those rabies shots yet? The old whore spent the last few

weekends downtown paying for donnies' beer...

There you go again... cementing your reputation as a miserable, nasty, low life, who delights in attacking other poster's innocent family members.
If you only would man-up and put the same effort into finding a real job....


And you cement yours as a cowardly little bitch every time you troll me
out, then a crybaby bitch every time I answer back.. LOL **** you
donnie, your family isn't innocent, they obviously enable you... So ****
'em...

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/25/13 12:30 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:36:28 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

They don't seem to understand the difference between tolerance and
"establishment"

If a government advanced one religion to the exclusion of all others,
that is clearly unconstitutional but if they allow the exercise of any
of them it is complying with the actual words on the page.



I don't see where "the government" is allowing or disallowing the
exercise of religion. What is not and should not be allowable is the
exercise of religion on the public's property, and the exercise of
religion includes manger scenes that allegedly depict the birth of the
Jewish fellow the Christians call Jesus.

Where does the 1st amendment say can't allow people to express their
faith on government property?
The congress is not making any law about it.
I have said before they can't favor one over another.
That was the basis for McLeary County
I can understand if they limited it to "free speech" zones that anyone
could use but that might actually be the show stopper if the
particular government did not want to allow other religions to display
their faith.



You're going way off into "tangent land." It's perfectly OK for, say, a
kid in a public school to say a prayer if he or she wants prior to
taking a test or whatever. It is NOT ok for the classroom teacher to
lead such a prayer.

An individual saying a prayer has nothing to do with any religious group
putting up a creche in the front yard of the public school, which should
not be allowed.

It's interesting to me that in this country, it is only christians for
the most part who seem most eager to push their religious beliefs onto
society as a whole through legislation, and who talk about America as a
"christian" nation. I wonder if it is because these sorts of christians
really have doubts about their beliefs and try to find security in
forcing others to believe as they do.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

You silly little man.
I don't involve them in any part of the crap in here.
As far as they know, I discuss boating with other boaters...not spending my time flushing out little turds from the head.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/25/13 7:17 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:46:45 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/25/13 12:30 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:36:28 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


Where does the 1st amendment say can't allow people to express their
faith on government property?
The congress is not making any law about it.
I have said before they can't favor one over another.
That was the basis for McLeary County
I can understand if they limited it to "free speech" zones that anyone
could use but that might actually be the show stopper if the
particular government did not want to allow other religions to display
their faith.



You're going way off into "tangent land." It's perfectly OK for, say, a
kid in a public school to say a prayer if he or she wants prior to
taking a test or whatever. It is NOT ok for the classroom teacher to
lead such a prayer.

An individual saying a prayer has nothing to do with any religious group
putting up a creche in the front yard of the public school, which should
not be allowed.

It's interesting to me that in this country, it is only christians for
the most part who seem most eager to push their religious beliefs onto
society as a whole through legislation, and who talk about America as a
"christian" nation. I wonder if it is because these sorts of christians
really have doubts about their beliefs and try to find security in
forcing others to believe as they do.


As long as it is OK for the government to use my tax money to build
stadiums for privately owned and operated sports franchises that I
have no interest in, I think they should be allowed to let religious
people use a little corner of a public park for their passion.


Well, I don't think it is appropriate for governments to be subsidizing
privately owned sports franchises in any way, and especially should not
be building or remodeling sports stadiums for the billionaires who own
the teams.

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:20:47 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

====

To understand what the fuss is about I think you have to put yourself
in the minority view for a minute. For example, what if you lived in
a town that had an Islamic majority, and everywhere you went there
were Islamic religious symbols on display. After a while you would
probably come around to the view that Islam was the "official"
religion and that everything else,

Well, not if you were in America and ever went to school..

====

I think you're forgetting that the purpose of this exercise is to put
yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment. One of the big issues
is that the parents in "other" religions resent having their children
surrounded by christian religious symbols. I think that's
understandable.

Why would Georgetown University be compelled to cover up or remove religious symbols on their
campus when they are a religious institution and working at and attending the school is
voluntary?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

On 4/25/2013 7:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/25/13 7:17 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:46:45 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/25/13 12:30 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:36:28 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


Where does the 1st amendment say can't allow people to express their
faith on government property?
The congress is not making any law about it.
I have said before they can't favor one over another.
That was the basis for McLeary County
I can understand if they limited it to "free speech" zones that anyone
could use but that might actually be the show stopper if the
particular government did not want to allow other religions to display
their faith.



You're going way off into "tangent land." It's perfectly OK for, say, a
kid in a public school to say a prayer if he or she wants prior to
taking a test or whatever. It is NOT ok for the classroom teacher to
lead such a prayer.

An individual saying a prayer has nothing to do with any religious group
putting up a creche in the front yard of the public school, which should
not be allowed.

It's interesting to me that in this country, it is only christians for
the most part who seem most eager to push their religious beliefs onto
society as a whole through legislation, and who talk about America as a
"christian" nation. I wonder if it is because these sorts of christians
really have doubts about their beliefs and try to find security in
forcing others to believe as they do.


As long as it is OK for the government to use my tax money to build
stadiums for privately owned and operated sports franchises that I
have no interest in, I think they should be allowed to let religious
people use a little corner of a public park for their passion.


Well, I don't think it is appropriate for governments to be subsidizing
privately owned sports franchises in any way, and especially should not
be building or remodeling sports stadiums for the billionaires who own
the teams.


How about privately own farms, manufacturing entities, special
interests, foreign countries, congressmens pet airports?

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:15:00 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll

tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so

means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!



Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.



Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!!

Cite me the last time someone was stoned to death by Christians in the US. Or anywhere on the globe.

Does that include bombings?


Muslims stoned Christians in Dearborn last year.

Bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/ap4zadv

Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
 

In article ,
says...

On 4/24/2013 12:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/23/2013 5:29 PM, wrote:


As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.


That's fine... and we won't mock them on Halloween, and they don't mock
us on Christmas. It's not the Christians trying to stop others free
speech, that only seems to go in one direction...

Really?

http://tinyurl.com/ao94hkr

http://tinyurl.com/bcf2ty9

http://tinyurl.com/axkrq9j


It is like the boycott of Chik Fil A, Whole Foods and Walmart isn't
it?

I am not sure how effective boycotts are but they are non-violent,
legal ways to protest.


There is a big difference between mocking and political speech... Was
that kevin posting those apples to our discussion of oranges, sounds
like him?

I don't know what KevinHarryPlume (that name should feed your insanity)
posted but *I* posted directly on topic to your idiotic, stupid, and
ignorant claim that Christians aren't stopping free speech.