![]() |
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:40:07 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 5:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/24/2013 4:22 PM, wrote: On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:15:00 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so means that you will be subjected to a very violent death! Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh. Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!! Cite me the last time someone was stoned to death by Christians in the US. Or anywhere on the globe. Muslims stoned Christians in Dearborn last year. You are arguing with kevin/plum/boater/so many others... anyway, he will say whatever it takes to get you to fight with him, even if it makes no sense at all. Some kind of mental damage, he enjoys the negative attention almost as much as our resident asshat... krause. The christians in this country don't need to stone muslims to death. Our christians have small arms, artillery, rockets, bombs, and so on and so forth. Why use stones when you can kill from a distance. But the military (of which you speak), that is comprised of all manner of religious and non-religious folk, are ultimately commanded by our POTUS. What religion is he, and what are his motives? |
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written essays edited over the centuries. === It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of others no matter how much you may disagree with them. |
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
|
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
|
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
On 4/24/13 7:53 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:46:53 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written essays edited over the centuries. === It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of others no matter how much you may disagree with them. Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of it themselves. ===== There's a big difference between being a so called "progressive" and having a significant personality disorder. You've been diagnosed, eh? |
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
True North wrote:
I thought Snottie wasn't allowed in the public schools, probably due to behaviour problems, and had to be 'home schooled'. Why would you think that and what post are you responding to? |
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:14:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written essays edited over the centuries. === It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of others no matter how much you may disagree with them. Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of it themselves. I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are destroying the concept of America. =============== It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of others no matter how much you may disagree with them. |
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
On 4/24/13 8:26 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:14:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written essays edited over the centuries. === It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of others no matter how much you may disagree with them. Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of it themselves. I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are destroying the concept of America. =============== It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of others no matter how much you may disagree with them. It isn't inappropriate to state clearly what I don't like about "the religious." I don't give a damn what they do in their houses of worship, or their homes, or even in their speeches or published papers. |
Teamsters protect Boston bombing victim's funeral.
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 8:14:09 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written essays edited over the centuries. === It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of others no matter how much you may disagree with them. Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of it themselves. I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the public's facilities to further their beliefs. Funny. That's exactly what *every* special interest group does, but I only seems to bother you when it's Christians. Why is that? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com