On 4/18/2013 4:48 PM, J Herring wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013 20:32:47 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:39:06 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/18/13 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:28:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Full Federal Appeals Court Unanimously Rejects
Cuccinelli?s Bid To Reinstate Anti-Sodomy Law


I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves of anal sex.


Salmonbait

Are you really so damned stupid that you think "sodomy" only refers to
anal sex? Or is it that you are that narrow minded?



It's been a long time since Herring left the farm and gave up sodomy
with the family livestock.

I would think the type animal (human or not) would make little
difference to fudge-packers. Would
you expound on that, please?

Oh, could an imminent fudge-pack have been the 'special circumstance' to
which you referred? Now
*that* would be a reason to chamber a round!


Salmonbait

What a homophobic, bigoted, moronic piece of **** you are.

And misinformed. Male to female anal intercourse is very common among
teenagers, among other heterosexuals.

Oh, now you're changing the subject to heterosexuals!

"Special Circumstances" got you too scared to respond?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


harry krause just wants to tale about sex with children.. It's one of
his talking points...

On 4/18/2013 6:10 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/18/13 5:57 PM, J Herring wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013 20:56:53 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

J Herring wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013 20:32:47 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:39:06 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 4/18/13 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:28:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

Full Federal Appeals Court Unanimously Rejects
Cuccinelli?s Bid To Reinstate Anti-Sodomy Law


I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves
of anal sex.


Salmonbait

Are you really so damned stupid that you think "sodomy" only
refers to
anal sex? Or is it that you are that narrow minded?



It's been a long time since Herring left the farm and gave up
sodomy
with the family livestock.

I would think the type animal (human or not) would make little
difference to fudge-packers. Would
you expound on that, please?

Oh, could an imminent fudge-pack have been the 'special
circumstance' to
which you referred? Now
*that* would be a reason to chamber a round!


Salmonbait

What a homophobic, bigoted, moronic piece of **** you are.

And misinformed. Male to female anal intercourse is very common among
teenagers, among other heterosexuals.

Oh, now you're changing the subject to heterosexuals!

"Special Circumstances" got you too scared to respond?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The subject was your gubernatorial candidate's attempt to reinstate
anti-sodomy laws and how his effort was stopped by the court.

I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves of gay
anal sex.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


I disapprove of any government officials who intrude into the bedrooms
of consenting adults, whatever the gender of those adults.

Unless it's to tell them what to eat, what kind of lighting to use, what
protection they are allowed to keep, where they can smoke...... etc,
etc, etc....

F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/18/13 8:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/18/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/18/13 7:30 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:48:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/17/13 5:56 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:28:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

Full Federal Appeals Court Unanimously Rejects
Cuccinelli’s Bid To Reinstate Anti-Sodomy Law


I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves of
anal sex.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


As if that were the issue. Cuccinelli is a flaming ass, and it is
just
hilarious he is the attorney general of Virginia. My guess is that
he is
going to lose the general election, if he is the nominee. The
majority
of Virginians really don't like the overly religious dictating to
them.

I don't have sexual hang-ups, Herring. Whatever sexual practices
adults
or near adults enter into willingly without hurting their partners is
not my business. But I know sex is troubling to you.


I can't understand why you get so bent out of shape and revert to
name-calling. I simply extended
some compassion.

The disapproval of anal sex is totally against your upbringing and
state of mind. OK. So let it be.

How would you 'know' sex is troubling to me, FOAD? You've no
'knowledge' of me. Others here, maybe,
but I'm not one of them.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



How would anyone know "sex" is troubling to you? Your sexual hangups
are
as obvious here as your racism.


Oh, so you just made it up.. we get it.


Can't you find yourself a nice newsgroup for the emotionally disturbed
and developmentally challenged? You could wear your little porkpie
hat, ponytail and greasy facial hair as a disguise.

When is the IRS going to finally catch up to you and throw your ass in
jail for your unpaid taxes? At least you don't have a home or a boat to
lose.

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:28:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Full Federal Appeals Court Unanimously Rejects
Cuccinelli?s Bid To Reinstate Anti-Sodomy Law


I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves of anal sex.


Salmonbait

Are you really so damned stupid that you think "sodomy" only refers to
anal sex? Or is it that you are that narrow minded?

So tell us about your explits in the giving blow jobs arena?

In article ,
says...

On 4/18/2013 6:10 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/18/13 5:57 PM, J Herring wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013 20:56:53 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

J Herring wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013 20:32:47 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:39:06 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 4/18/13 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:28:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

Full Federal Appeals Court Unanimously Rejects
Cuccinelli?s Bid To Reinstate Anti-Sodomy Law


I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves
of anal sex.


Salmonbait

Are you really so damned stupid that you think "sodomy" only
refers to
anal sex? Or is it that you are that narrow minded?



It's been a long time since Herring left the farm and gave up
sodomy
with the family livestock.

I would think the type animal (human or not) would make little
difference to fudge-packers. Would
you expound on that, please?

Oh, could an imminent fudge-pack have been the 'special
circumstance' to
which you referred? Now
*that* would be a reason to chamber a round!


Salmonbait

What a homophobic, bigoted, moronic piece of **** you are.

And misinformed. Male to female anal intercourse is very common among
teenagers, among other heterosexuals.

Oh, now you're changing the subject to heterosexuals!

"Special Circumstances" got you too scared to respond?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The subject was your gubernatorial candidate's attempt to reinstate
anti-sodomy laws and how his effort was stopped by the court.

I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves of gay
anal sex.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


I disapprove of any government officials who intrude into the bedrooms
of consenting adults, whatever the gender of those adults.

Unless it's to tell them what to eat, what kind of lighting to use, what
protection they are allowed to keep, where they can smoke...... etc,
etc, etc....

It's simple, but then again, you are so stupid and narrow minded, I'll
have to explain. What happens between two consenting adults sexually
doesn't harm other people. What lighting you use does. What
"protection" they are allowed to keep does. Where they can smoke does.

In article ,
says...

On 4/18/2013 3:41 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:39:06 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/18/13 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:28:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Full Federal Appeals Court Unanimously Rejects
Cuccinelli?s Bid To Reinstate Anti-Sodomy Law


I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves of anal sex.


Salmonbait

Are you really so damned stupid that you think "sodomy" only refers to
anal sex? Or is it that you are that narrow minded?



It's been a long time since Herring left the farm and gave up sodomy
with the family livestock.

I would think the type animal (human or not) would make little difference to fudge-packers. Would
you expound on that, please?

Oh, could an imminent fudge-pack have been the 'special circumstance' to which you referred? Now
*that* would be a reason to chamber a round!

LOL!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


You are as bigoted of a piece of crap as Herring.

On 4/19/13 8:29 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/18/2013 3:41 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:39:06 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/18/13 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:28:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Full Federal Appeals Court Unanimously Rejects
Cuccinelli?s Bid To Reinstate Anti-Sodomy Law


I can understand your being upset with someone who disapproves of anal sex.


Salmonbait

Are you really so damned stupid that you think "sodomy" only refers to
anal sex? Or is it that you are that narrow minded?



It's been a long time since Herring left the farm and gave up sodomy
with the family livestock.

I would think the type animal (human or not) would make little difference to fudge-packers. Would
you expound on that, please?

Oh, could an imminent fudge-pack have been the 'special circumstance' to which you referred? Now
*that* would be a reason to chamber a round!

LOL!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


You are as bigoted of a piece of crap as Herring.


And dumber.