|
NRA Specials
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:30:43 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 09:54:28 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers. Uh, Don, Canada is in North America. So is Mexico, but I doubt they call themselves Americans... at least the ones who stay south of the Rio Grande. Actually, they do realize that they're also Americans, and I'm sure they can spell the name properly. I'm glad to see you've learned to do so. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. |
NRA Specials
On 4/11/2013 10:51 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/11/13 10:33 AM, True North wrote: On Thursday, 11 April 2013 10:29:20 UTC-3, Hank© wrote: On 4/11/2013 8:46 AM, True North wrote: You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers. What were you before you got your Canadian citizenship papers? The unborn.............. ding, ding, ding, we have a winner. it's spelled weiner. |
NRA Specials
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:23:13 -0400, Hank©
wrote: On 4/11/2013 10:51 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/11/13 10:33 AM, True North wrote: On Thursday, 11 April 2013 10:29:20 UTC-3, Hank© wrote: On 4/11/2013 8:46 AM, True North wrote: You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers. What were you before you got your Canadian citizenship papers? The unborn.............. ding, ding, ding, we have a winner. it's spelled weiner. The thing you don't have? |
NRA Specials
In article , says...
"BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... It's not the members. 74% of the NRA membership support universal background checks. The nut case is Wayne LaPierre who happens to get all the media publicity. BTW ... he's not even the President of the NRA. He performs the roll of CEO and is the national spokesman and loud mouth. Problem is he doesn't present membership views ... only his own. Please provide an objective source for your "74% of the NRA membership support universal backgroud checks." --------------------------------------------------- These will get you started. Objectivity is up to you to determine: http://www.bradycampaign.org/studies/view/240/ Not objective. http://www.statesman.com/news/news/local/politifact-polls-show-support-for-gun-checks-even-/nXFMt/ No reference to where the 74% comes from. http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/ny-poll-big-backing-for-assault-ban-86333.html Not objective. http://www.thecrimereport.org/news/crime-and-justice-news/2013-02-polls-support-background-checks Nearly three quarters (74 percent) of NRA members supported requiring a background check system ?for all gun sales? in a January online survey by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (respondents were recruited offline using a probability sampling method). This poll is suspect on its face. ----------------------------------------------------------- As I alluded to in my reply, I suspect *any* study or poll that doesn't support your point of view is "suspect". Doesn't matter. You are free to believe what you want to believe as am I. I distrust polls that only provide a final percentage without providing what the questions are, what the acceptable answers were and what order the questions where asked. |
NRA Specials
|
NRA Specials
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:02:41 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. Go back and read about the Massacheusetts ratification convention. ------------------------------------------------ I fail to see what it has to do with background checks to purchase a gun in 2013. Things have changed a bit since 1788 and changes to laws are sometimes required. For example, I'd like to see a uniform travel law established for permitted, legal gun owners. There's no Federal law restricting inter-state travel but each state has it's own set of rules and reciprocity agreements. I can't travel from MA to SC to visit my son with a gun in my car without violating the law in several states. In many ways I think traveling down RT 95 through New York, New Jersey, and other areas south is probably more dangerous than some war zones if you happen to be forced to stop in the wrong places. Uniform travel law? If we are moving to national laws we should just go to the point where each state has to recognize each other states CCP, concealed carry permits, without modificaiton, exception or modification. If I am originally permitted in one state that should be accepted by all states whenever I enter those states or when I move from state to state. Why would one right be andy different from any other right? So, you don't believe in state's rights or you do? You don't when it comes to guns, but you do when it comes to other things? Your "logic" is so twisted not even a pretzel could sort it out. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com