|
Opening day
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:14:49 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/4/13 1:10 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/4/13 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on others property from everything he has told us. Cite? I didn't think so, just more lies from you. Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. You got booted for political bull****. We all read the thread... You're just betraying your idiocy once again, but I won't tell you why. BTW, how's your blackmail case proceeding? We haven't heard anything yet down here. How's those 'special circumstances' proceeding? We haven't heard anything yet down here. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. |
Opening day
|
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 1:12 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Isn't "over there" the place where he picked up his Asshat nik? Harry is so ****ed at mdshooters.com that he put up this website. http://marylandshooter.com/ |
Opening day
|
Opening day
In article ,
says... On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/4/13 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on others property from everything he has told us. Cite? I didn't think so, just more lies from you. Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. You got booted for political bull****. We all read the thread... No, "we" didn't please post it. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 1:30 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Who is this "we" you always speak of? Come on, if you are going to be a crazy insane fool, have the balls to own it. Some of the boys at the Maryland gun site are busy collecting the names and addresses of those who have contributed to the campaigns of the state lawmakers who are approving the new regulations. Why? So they can contact them. There are some heavy duty corporate donors, too, including banks. I'm not sure what the goal of the "contact" is, since the die is cast. The reality is that the majority of Marylanders live in the more populated areas, and they made it clear to their state lawmakers they supported the governor's plan to tighten gun regs here. So, the proposed regs, for the most part, are getting through our state's legislature and likely will be signed into law next week by the governor. |
Opening day
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:45:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/4/13 1:30 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Who is this "we" you always speak of? Come on, if you are going to be a crazy insane fool, have the balls to own it. Some of the boys at the Maryland gun site are busy collecting the names and addresses of those who have contributed to the campaigns of the state lawmakers who are approving the new regulations. Why? So they can contact them. There are some heavy duty corporate donors, too, including banks. I'm not sure what the goal of the "contact" is, since the die is cast. The reality is that the majority of Marylanders live in the more populated areas, and they made it clear to their state lawmakers they supported the governor's plan to tighten gun regs here. So, the proposed regs, for the most part, are getting through our state's legislature and likely will be signed into law next week by the governor. Sure, ESAD. Now tell about your 'special circumstances' which caused you to use your thumb safety! As to the Maryland regs - which ones would have prevented the Newtown massacre? Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. |
Opening day
In article ,
says... On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:45:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/4/13 1:30 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Who is this "we" you always speak of? Come on, if you are going to be a crazy insane fool, have the balls to own it. Some of the boys at the Maryland gun site are busy collecting the names and addresses of those who have contributed to the campaigns of the state lawmakers who are approving the new regulations. Why? So they can contact them. There are some heavy duty corporate donors, too, including banks. I'm not sure what the goal of the "contact" is, since the die is cast. The reality is that the majority of Marylanders live in the more populated areas, and they made it clear to their state lawmakers they supported the governor's plan to tighten gun regs here. So, the proposed regs, for the most part, are getting through our state's legislature and likely will be signed into law next week by the governor. Sure, ESAD. Now tell about your 'special circumstances' which caused you to use your thumb safety! As to the Maryland regs - which ones would have prevented the Newtown massacre? Salmonbait Probably the same special circumstances that made a polymer and an alloy one in the same. |
Opening day
I hope there's something to limit ex-military from stockpiling firearms.
Seems like every time there's a mass shooting by someone over 35, turns out he's a vet. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com