In article ,
says...

On 3/30/2013 5:54 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 3/30/2013 5:22 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/30/13 5:07 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 3/30/13 4:45 PM, Eisboch wrote:



Have you ever tried any of the sub-sonic ammo? I haven't and am
curious how much they diminish the "crack" when they are fired.



It's a noticeable difference, but they're still pretty loud rounds. I've
seen demos of suppressors with subsonic rounds, and on a .22LR, the
sound is still there, but it's very soft and does not sound anything
like a firearm.

----------------------------------------

I bought a Ruger Air Magnum Pellet rifle a couple of months ago thinking
I could use it for target practice on my property. The nearest
neighbor's house is about 400 feet from where I'd be shooting and in the
opposite direction of where I'd be aiming, so I figured it wouldn't be a
bother to him.

Boy, was I surprised. The damn thing is louder than the Marlin .22
lever action I have. Muzzle velocity is actually higher. 1200 fps for
the standard lead pellets and 1400 fps for the light, alloy pellets.
Very accurate, but it weighs a ton.

http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/airgundepot_2254_185840498





Aging minds think alike. I'm interested in the suppressor because
there's an area, a dry creek bed, on our property that is legally
distant enough from neighboring properties, to be used as a target
range. The creek bed is 15 to 20 feet deep where I'd like to set up a
range, and it curves where the backstop would be. Ideal. Except...I
don't want to disturb the neighbors and...the snakes...I am sure are
down there somewhere. A suppressor would allow me to use my .22lr
pistol and rifle down there.

If it's not on an authorized range you are not allowed to fire a gun in
Maryland. I suppose hunting is illegal in Maryland as well.

It's a liberal thing.. as long as you don't think it will bother
anybody, you can break the law in Maryland I guess.

And of course you took that as truth, and surely didn't look it up, as
any moron would do.

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

On 4/1/13 3:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


Told ya, John the Racist. Coat the barrel with vaseline, shove it up
your ass and pull the trigger. Oh, and get some help for your
perseveration problem.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

The question that really stumped ME was your question about polymers and
alloys. I didn't know there were people that stupid.

On 4/1/13 4:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

The question that really stumped ME was your question about polymers and
alloys. I didn't know there were people that stupid.


Have you forgotten the questions he asked about the oils to use in his
four stroke outboard?

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:31:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 3:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


Told ya, John the Racist. Coat the barrel with vaseline, shove it up
your ass and pull the trigger. Oh, and get some help for your
perseveration problem.

Me? You mentioned the lack of safeties several times! Little perseverance of your own, eh?

So...How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

I wouldn't be surprised if you said, "I don't know!"


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

On 4/1/13 5:03 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:31:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 3:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


Told ya, John the Racist. Coat the barrel with vaseline, shove it up
your ass and pull the trigger. Oh, and get some help for your
perseveration problem.

Me? You mentioned the lack of safeties several times! Little perseverance of your own, eh?

So...How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

I wouldn't be surprised if you said, "I don't know!"


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


I would treat the semi-auto without a safety not at all, Herring. I
wouldn't own one. I did for a while, a Glock 34, but its lack of a real
safety was the motivating reason for trading it in on on the Sig X-5,
which had an ambi safety.

On 4/1/2013 4:31 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/1/13 3:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any
subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay
hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from
one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important
date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have
your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


Told ya, John the Racist. Coat the barrel with vaseline, shove it up
your ass and pull the trigger. Oh, and get some help for your
perseveration problem.


Wow, that's some pretty nasty ****... wonder if you will get chastised
by... uh, oh forget it. Dance on man, Welcome to the Hotel California...

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:04:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 5:03 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:31:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 3:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


Told ya, John the Racist. Coat the barrel with vaseline, shove it up
your ass and pull the trigger. Oh, and get some help for your
perseveration problem.

Me? You mentioned the lack of safeties several times! Little perseverance of your own, eh?

So...How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

I wouldn't be surprised if you said, "I don't know!"


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


I would treat the semi-auto without a safety not at all, Herring. I
wouldn't own one. I did for a while, a Glock 34, but its lack of a real
safety was the motivating reason for trading it in on on the Sig X-5,
which had an ambi safety.

That's a tap dance, ESAD, not an answer! Show us your extensive knowledge - that which you boast of
constantly.

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.