On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:31:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 3:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:54:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, 1 April 2013 10:13:29 UTC-3, John H wrote:

snip..


It's for damn sure I don't know 2% of what you know about any subject! Your knowledge of everything

is simply astonishing. You point that out to us on a daily, nay hourly, basis.



Now, how would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?





Salmonbait


Johnny, you spent almost your entire Easter.. the most important date in the church calendar, obsessing about handguns.
What is wrong with you.... and to make matters worse you now have your wife excited about them.
I can't see anything good coming from all this.

FOX and the NRA told him he needed guns, of course. Am I the only one
who has noticed that John never, EVER mentioned the need nor the desire
to have any guns until talk of limiting gun ownership started? What a
sheeple.


Herring has nothing meaningful to do in his retirement, so he is filling
the years between now and his dirt hole with new hobbies.

That question really has you stumped, doesn't it ESAFOADD?

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

Just how valuable are all the 'safeties' to which you keep referring?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


Told ya, John the Racist. Coat the barrel with vaseline, shove it up
your ass and pull the trigger. Oh, and get some help for your
perseveration problem.

Me? You mentioned the lack of safeties several times! Little perseverance of your own, eh?

So...How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?

I wouldn't be surprised if you said, "I don't know!"


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.