Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:58:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/31/13 3:19 PM, J Herring wrote: On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:01:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/31/13 7:44 AM, J Herring wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote: ...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife loves the size. While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear decides to break into the house. Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag. You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That might be interesting! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun. Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size. On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. There is *no* safety on that pistol. Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****. Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. You really have trouble with language. SIG makes fine weapons. But the particular pistol you bought does *not* have a real safety. A real safety prevents the trigger from being pulled to the point where the weapon will fire. You and S&W define 'safety' differently, but, ESADAFOD, you are correct of course. I guess I'll just have to buy a couple CZ's and have a few thousand dollars worth of modifications done to them. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. You spent less time picking out your new pistol than I would deciding whether I wanted a ham sandwich on rye or whole wheat. My statement about safeties stands. If you can pull the trigger and make the gun go bang, it isn't a safety. A stock steel CZ-75 out of the box will outshoot that P250 of yours. I had a highly accurate Sig X-5, and my CZ, which cost half as much, will outshoot it. Actually, it's a combination of the high quality CZ and the high quality CZ shooter! Your pistol, with or without modifications is undoubtedly the best made. Coupled with your demonstrated (several times by you) magnificent marksmanship, why the combination is simply unbeatable! There is no need whatsoever for you to toot your horn. We all know how good you are! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sig Sauer P250 | General | |||
TV or Sig Sauer? Who cares? | General | |||
Like my new sig | ASA | |||
My New Sig. | ASA | |||
Gaynz's new sig . . . | ASA |