Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Picked up the Sig Sauer P250

On 3/31/13 3:19 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:01:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/31/13 7:44 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.

Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



You really have trouble with language. SIG makes fine weapons. But the
particular pistol you bought does *not* have a real safety. A real
safety prevents the trigger from being pulled to the point where the
weapon will fire.


You and S&W define 'safety' differently, but, ESADAFOD, you are correct of course.

I guess I'll just have to buy a couple CZ's and have a few thousand dollars worth of modifications
done to them.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


You spent less time picking out your new pistol than I would deciding
whether I wanted a ham sandwich on rye or whole wheat. My statement
about safeties stands. If you can pull the trigger and make the gun go
bang, it isn't a safety.

A stock steel CZ-75 out of the box will outshoot that P250 of yours. I
had a highly accurate Sig X-5, and my CZ, which cost half as much, will
outshoot it.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 847
Default Picked up the Sig Sauer P250

On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:58:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/31/13 3:19 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:01:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/31/13 7:44 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.

Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



You really have trouble with language. SIG makes fine weapons. But the
particular pistol you bought does *not* have a real safety. A real
safety prevents the trigger from being pulled to the point where the
weapon will fire.


You and S&W define 'safety' differently, but, ESADAFOD, you are correct of course.

I guess I'll just have to buy a couple CZ's and have a few thousand dollars worth of modifications
done to them.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


You spent less time picking out your new pistol than I would deciding
whether I wanted a ham sandwich on rye or whole wheat. My statement
about safeties stands. If you can pull the trigger and make the gun go
bang, it isn't a safety.

A stock steel CZ-75 out of the box will outshoot that P250 of yours. I
had a highly accurate Sig X-5, and my CZ, which cost half as much, will
outshoot it.


Actually, it's a combination of the high quality CZ and the high quality CZ shooter! Your pistol,
with or without modifications is undoubtedly the best made. Coupled with your demonstrated (several
times by you) magnificent marksmanship, why the combination is simply unbeatable!

There is no need whatsoever for you to toot your horn. We all know how good you are!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 110
Default Picked up the Sig Sauer P250

On Sunday, March 31, 2013 2:58:29 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/31/13 3:19 PM, J Herring wrote:

On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:01:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:




On 3/31/13 7:44 AM, J Herring wrote:


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:




On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:




On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:


On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:


...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife


loves the size.




While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td




Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear


decides to break into the house.




Salmonbait




--


Hope you're having a spectacular day!




Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.




You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That


might be interesting!




Salmonbait




--


'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.




Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.




Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.




On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want


anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!






Salmonbait




--


'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.








There is *no* safety on that pistol.




Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.




Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday!






Salmonbait




--


'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.








You really have trouble with language. SIG makes fine weapons. But the


particular pistol you bought does *not* have a real safety. A real


safety prevents the trigger from being pulled to the point where the


weapon will fire.




You and S&W define 'safety' differently, but, ESADAFOD, you are correct of course.




I guess I'll just have to buy a couple CZ's and have a few thousand dollars worth of modifications


done to them.






Salmonbait




--


'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.






You spent less time picking out your new pistol than I would deciding

whether I wanted a ham sandwich on rye or whole wheat. My statement

about safeties stands. If you can pull the trigger and make the gun go

bang, it isn't a safety.



A stock steel CZ-75 out of the box will outshoot that P250 of yours. I

had a highly accurate Sig X-5, and my CZ, which cost half as much, will

outshoot it.


Hatteras / 4 tax liens / 2 bankruptcies
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 569
Default Picked up the Sig Sauer P250

On 3/31/2013 5:16 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, March 31, 2013 2:58:29 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/31/13 3:19 PM, J Herring wrote:

On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:01:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:




On 3/31/13 7:44 AM, J Herring wrote:


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:




On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:




On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:


On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:


...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife


loves the size.




While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:
http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td



Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear


decides to break into the house.




Salmonbait




--


Hope you're having a spectacular day!




Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.




You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That


might be interesting!




Salmonbait




--


'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.




Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.




Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.




On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want


anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!






Salmonbait




--


'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.








There is *no* safety on that pistol.




Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.




Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday!






Salmonbait




--


'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.








You really have trouble with language. SIG makes fine weapons. But the


particular pistol you bought does *not* have a real safety. A real


safety prevents the trigger from being pulled to the point where the


weapon will fire.




You and S&W define 'safety' differently, but, ESADAFOD, you are correct of course.




I guess I'll just have to buy a couple CZ's and have a few thousand dollars worth of modifications


done to them.






Salmonbait




--


'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.






You spent less time picking out your new pistol than I would deciding

whether I wanted a ham sandwich on rye or whole wheat. My statement

about safeties stands. If you can pull the trigger and make the gun go

bang, it isn't a safety.



A stock steel CZ-75 out of the box will outshoot that P250 of yours. I

had a highly accurate Sig X-5, and my CZ, which cost half as much, will

outshoot it.


Hatteras / 4 tax liens / 2 bankruptcies / red barn/ owls/ bobcat/ lobsta boat


/ strip mall/ young southern debutante/ dined with every president
since truman/

twin screw diesel something or other racing trawler/ Toyota SUV/ deck/
generator/

storm door/ coffee maker/ grungy sink/ on and on


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sig Sauer P250 J Herring General 37 March 22nd 13 03:04 AM
TV or Sig Sauer? Who cares? jps General 66 September 5th 12 02:33 PM
Like my new sig Capt. Neal® ASA 2 April 16th 05 02:00 PM
My New Sig. Capt. Neal® ASA 2 March 18th 05 02:35 AM
Gaynz's new sig . . . Capt. Neal® ASA 3 February 6th 05 07:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017