| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Why we can't have good things
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 08:27:06 -0500, amdx
wrote: On 4/6/2013 6:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:32:09 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/4/2013 9:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:42:41 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: Anecdotes don't "prove" much of anything Julie's flaw is she is using the current tax going forward. There is NO baby boomer who paid more than $104,000 between 1966 and 1996 (both employer and employee contribution) I have my SSA statement in my hand and I paid the max every one of those years. Prior to 96 the cap was $4800 and the tax rate was lower so those will be very small numbers. I agree a Gen Xer probably won't get back all he paid in and may not really get much of anything. Sorry. Don't point out Julie Morse's flaw. Urin Asshole is invested in what she wrote as the gospel and will not entertain any evidence that she could be wrong. Also did you find any way to contact her? I want her to set the record straight, but find no email or any way to subscribe to the webpage. SS payments are progressive, meaning the more you pay in the longer it takes to get it back, and the less you pay in the the shorter your payback time. Mikek PS Urin, please don't recycle the tired old names you've been calling me, be a little creative. :-) Ok. Go **** yourself. Do you feel better now? SS benefits are based on your highest earning 35 years. You don't know anything about how SS works. Yeah, if you pay in more it takes longer to get it all back. No ****. You say I don't know anything about how SS works, and then go on with a long winded explanation to say SS is progressive. Odd, you agree with me but still make it an argument. Have a happy* day, Mikek * or spew anger all day if you want. Long winded???? Compared to your bull**** number crunching that went on for 10 paragraphs? Stop being deliberately stupid. You don't need to go beyond natively stupid. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why we can't have good things
On 4/7/2013 12:39 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 08:27:06 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/6/2013 6:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:32:09 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/4/2013 9:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:42:41 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: Anecdotes don't "prove" much of anything Julie's flaw is she is using the current tax going forward. There is NO baby boomer who paid more than $104,000 between 1966 and 1996 (both employer and employee contribution) I have my SSA statement in my hand and I paid the max every one of those years. Prior to 96 the cap was $4800 and the tax rate was lower so those will be very small numbers. I agree a Gen Xer probably won't get back all he paid in and may not really get much of anything. Sorry. Don't point out Julie Morse's flaw. Urin Asshole is invested in what she wrote as the gospel and will not entertain any evidence that she could be wrong. Also did you find any way to contact her? I want her to set the record straight, but find no email or any way to subscribe to the webpage. SS payments are progressive, meaning the more you pay in the longer it takes to get it back, and the less you pay in the the shorter your payback time. Mikek PS Urin, please don't recycle the tired old names you've been calling me, be a little creative. :-) Ok. Go **** yourself. Do you feel better now? SS benefits are based on your highest earning 35 years. You don't know anything about how SS works. Yeah, if you pay in more it takes longer to get it all back. No ****. You say I don't know anything about how SS works, and then go on with a long winded explanation to say SS is progressive. Odd, you agree with me but still make it an argument. Have a happy* day, Mikek * or spew anger all day if you want. Long winded???? Compared to your bull**** number crunching that went on for 10 paragraphs? Oh, sorry if I offended you. Mikek |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why we can't have good things
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:18:23 -0500, amdx wrote:
On 4/7/2013 12:39 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 08:27:06 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/6/2013 6:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:32:09 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/4/2013 9:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:42:41 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: Anecdotes don't "prove" much of anything Julie's flaw is she is using the current tax going forward. There is NO baby boomer who paid more than $104,000 between 1966 and 1996 (both employer and employee contribution) I have my SSA statement in my hand and I paid the max every one of those years. Prior to 96 the cap was $4800 and the tax rate was lower so those will be very small numbers. I agree a Gen Xer probably won't get back all he paid in and may not really get much of anything. Sorry. Don't point out Julie Morse's flaw. Urin Asshole is invested in what she wrote as the gospel and will not entertain any evidence that she could be wrong. Also did you find any way to contact her? I want her to set the record straight, but find no email or any way to subscribe to the webpage. SS payments are progressive, meaning the more you pay in the longer it takes to get it back, and the less you pay in the the shorter your payback time. Mikek PS Urin, please don't recycle the tired old names you've been calling me, be a little creative. :-) Ok. Go **** yourself. Do you feel better now? SS benefits are based on your highest earning 35 years. You don't know anything about how SS works. Yeah, if you pay in more it takes longer to get it all back. No ****. You say I don't know anything about how SS works, and then go on with a long winded explanation to say SS is progressive. Odd, you agree with me but still make it an argument. Have a happy* day, Mikek * or spew anger all day if you want. Long winded???? Compared to your bull**** number crunching that went on for 10 paragraphs? Oh, sorry if I offended you. Mikek So, you're just ****ing stupid. That's not offensive. That's sad. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why we can't have good things
On 4/7/2013 6:06 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:18:23 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/7/2013 12:39 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 08:27:06 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/6/2013 6:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:32:09 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/4/2013 9:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:42:41 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: Anecdotes don't "prove" much of anything Julie's flaw is she is using the current tax going forward. There is NO baby boomer who paid more than $104,000 between 1966 and 1996 (both employer and employee contribution) I have my SSA statement in my hand and I paid the max every one of those years. Prior to 96 the cap was $4800 and the tax rate was lower so those will be very small numbers. I agree a Gen Xer probably won't get back all he paid in and may not really get much of anything. Sorry. Don't point out Julie Morse's flaw. Urin Asshole is invested in what she wrote as the gospel and will not entertain any evidence that she could be wrong. Also did you find any way to contact her? I want her to set the record straight, but find no email or any way to subscribe to the webpage. SS payments are progressive, meaning the more you pay in the longer it takes to get it back, and the less you pay in the the shorter your payback time. Mikek PS Urin, please don't recycle the tired old names you've been calling me, be a little creative. :-) Ok. Go **** yourself. Do you feel better now? SS benefits are based on your highest earning 35 years. You don't know anything about how SS works. Yeah, if you pay in more it takes longer to get it all back. No ****. You say I don't know anything about how SS works, and then go on with a long winded explanation to say SS is progressive. Odd, you agree with me but still make it an argument. Have a happy* day, Mikek * or spew anger all day if you want. Long winded???? Compared to your bull**** number crunching that went on for 10 paragraphs? Oh, sorry if I offended you. Mikek So, you're just ****ing stupid. That's not offensive. That's sad. You should try square breathing to ease that tension. Mikek |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why we can't have good things
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:36:17 -0500, amdx
wrote: On 4/7/2013 6:06 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:18:23 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/7/2013 12:39 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 08:27:06 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/6/2013 6:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:32:09 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/4/2013 9:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:42:41 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: Anecdotes don't "prove" much of anything Julie's flaw is she is using the current tax going forward. There is NO baby boomer who paid more than $104,000 between 1966 and 1996 (both employer and employee contribution) I have my SSA statement in my hand and I paid the max every one of those years. Prior to 96 the cap was $4800 and the tax rate was lower so those will be very small numbers. I agree a Gen Xer probably won't get back all he paid in and may not really get much of anything. Sorry. Don't point out Julie Morse's flaw. Urin Asshole is invested in what she wrote as the gospel and will not entertain any evidence that she could be wrong. Also did you find any way to contact her? I want her to set the record straight, but find no email or any way to subscribe to the webpage. SS payments are progressive, meaning the more you pay in the longer it takes to get it back, and the less you pay in the the shorter your payback time. Mikek PS Urin, please don't recycle the tired old names you've been calling me, be a little creative. :-) Ok. Go **** yourself. Do you feel better now? SS benefits are based on your highest earning 35 years. You don't know anything about how SS works. Yeah, if you pay in more it takes longer to get it all back. No ****. You say I don't know anything about how SS works, and then go on with a long winded explanation to say SS is progressive. Odd, you agree with me but still make it an argument. Have a happy* day, Mikek * or spew anger all day if you want. Long winded???? Compared to your bull**** number crunching that went on for 10 paragraphs? Oh, sorry if I offended you. Mikek So, you're just ****ing stupid. That's not offensive. That's sad. You should try square breathing to ease that tension. Mikek Which tension? You're the one with deepseated problems. I feel sorry for you. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why we can't have good things
On 4/7/2013 9:41 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:36:17 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/7/2013 6:06 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:18:23 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/7/2013 12:39 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 08:27:06 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/6/2013 6:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:32:09 -0500, amdx wrote: On 4/4/2013 9:14 PM, wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:42:41 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: Anecdotes don't "prove" much of anything Julie's flaw is she is using the current tax going forward. There is NO baby boomer who paid more than $104,000 between 1966 and 1996 (both employer and employee contribution) I have my SSA statement in my hand and I paid the max every one of those years. Prior to 96 the cap was $4800 and the tax rate was lower so those will be very small numbers. I agree a Gen Xer probably won't get back all he paid in and may not really get much of anything. Sorry. Don't point out Julie Morse's flaw. Urin Asshole is invested in what she wrote as the gospel and will not entertain any evidence that she could be wrong. Also did you find any way to contact her? I want her to set the record straight, but find no email or any way to subscribe to the webpage. SS payments are progressive, meaning the more you pay in the longer it takes to get it back, and the less you pay in the the shorter your payback time. Mikek PS Urin, please don't recycle the tired old names you've been calling me, be a little creative. :-) Ok. Go **** yourself. Do you feel better now? SS benefits are based on your highest earning 35 years. You don't know anything about how SS works. Yeah, if you pay in more it takes longer to get it all back. No ****. You say I don't know anything about how SS works, and then go on with a long winded explanation to say SS is progressive. Odd, you agree with me but still make it an argument. Have a happy* day, Mikek * or spew anger all day if you want. Long winded???? Compared to your bull**** number crunching that went on for 10 paragraphs? Oh, sorry if I offended you. Mikek So, you're just ****ing stupid. That's not offensive. That's sad. You should try square breathing to ease that tension. Mikek Which tension? You're the one with deepseated problems. I feel sorry for you. LOL. :-) |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Three (3) Things that Happened Today that Made Me Feel Good. | ASA | |||
| Three (3) Things that Happened Today that Made Me Feel Good. | ASA | |||
| Three (3) Things that Happened Today that Made Me Feel Good. | ASA | |||
| Things that BS know nothing about. | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
