Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On 28 Mar 2013 11:03:32 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/27/2013 11:44 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:29 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Sometimes they hit every number in the phone book, other times they
start with a prefix and hit all 10,000 numbers.

Did you READ the article?

Yes, it said nothing about the scope of the robocall campaign only
that people in Newtown got called. It didn't even say if they were
only people on the NRA donors list.




Just more smoke and mirrors and nothing compared to the nasty grave
dancing folks like jps do every time some child gets killed.

Pointing out news that reports on children murdered by guns is not grave
dancing. Minimizing it as you and your mouth-breathing cohorts want to
do...is.

How's your blackmail scam working out?

Wrong again! He and his buddies breathe through their ears... nothing
there to stop the flow of hot air.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:40:26 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Urin Asshole" wrote in message


Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?


Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.

I said that not long after it showed up here. Same key phrases, same old BS. It's just another sock back with a different name, and attempting (poorly) to re-invent itself. A third-rate troll at best.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 4:48 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:37:49 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

It was the will of the people AKA the democracy you referenced above.
Are you saying the application of democracy can be selective?

I'm saying that the minority needs to be protected from the majority,
which is what the constitution is all about dickwad.

The open question is whether "gay" is a protected class then isn't it?
That is the question Scalia asked the other day.
Are bigamists going to be the next protected class?
Why can't 3 people be married?
At a certain point people may even start questioning the "age of
majority/consent" that is an arbitrary number that is not even uniform
among the states.




Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to
bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.


And plume showed up less than 24 hours after loogie left... And loogie
is kevin, there you go.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


We have an amendment process for changing and amending the Constitution.
Getting rid of state's rights can be accomplished by following the
process. Also, a liberal Supreme Court that is as activist as the
current conservative Supreme Court could issue rulings that abrogate
more of what are considered state's rights.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 7:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

Because, of course, they intend to surround your house and tell you to
come out with your hands up, and they know you'll start shooting off
your mouth or your peashooter.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 7:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to
bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.


And plume showed up less than 24 hours after loogie left... And loogie
is kevin, there you go.

As if you had the mental acuity to analyze anything.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

"Wayne B" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights,"
and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.

----------------------------------------------

"finally getting rid of state's rights"? .... Holy Moley! ... give
a liberal an inch and they'll take a mile.