Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 7:48 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

---------------------------------------

Where did you hear that Scott? The DHS is *not* buying up "all" the
ammo.
The bulk of the ammo is being bought by private citizens in an
unrealistic belief and panic that the "government" is going to outlaw
it or make it unavailable. It's a bunch of BS.



Read up Dick... It's just coming out in hearings two days ago. Their
answer first is "we are just saving money by buying 5 years worth of ammo
instead of one year at a time"... The next question was if for just
plinking and practice, why all the expensive hollow point ammo... It will
come out Dick, I just pay a bit more attention to CSpan that most here... mark my words...

Snerk. They're going to arm the drones circling your house.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On 29 Mar 2013 04:12:56 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 7:48 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

---------------------------------------

Where did you hear that Scott? The DHS is *not* buying up "all" the
ammo.
The bulk of the ammo is being bought by private citizens in an
unrealistic belief and panic that the "government" is going to outlaw
it or make it unavailable. It's a bunch of BS.



Read up Dick... It's just coming out in hearings two days ago. Their
answer first is "we are just saving money by buying 5 years worth of ammo
instead of one year at a time"... The next question was if for just
plinking and practice, why all the expensive hollow point ammo... It will
come out Dick, I just pay a bit more attention to CSpan that most here... mark my words...

Snerk. They're going to arm the drones circling your house.

Circling inside his empty head.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:16:22 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:07:55 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.

These two cases have nothing to do with any such action. A lot of
"reasons the way things are" have to do with antiquated views and
fear. That argument doesn't stand for very long.

Actually the decision overturning DOMA may end up citing the 9th and
10th amendment.

SCOTUS tea leaves are hard to read...

Maybe, but it seems more likely it'll be 14:

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to
the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the
state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law
which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:59:42 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:07:55 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:17:48 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.

These two cases have nothing to do with any such action. A lot of
"reasons the way things are" have to do with antiquated views and
fear. That argument doesn't stand for very long.

=======

There is nothing antiquated about being concerned with big government.

The finding of unconstitutionality of DOMA would be directly in line
with that philosophy.

In fact Kennedy is strongly in favor of state's right and in favor of
equal protection.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:42:57 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:11:32 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:56:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/28/13 7:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/28/13 4:48 PM, wrote:

The open question is whether "gay" is a protected class then isn't it?
That is the question Scalia asked the other day.
Are bigamists going to be the next protected class?
Why can't 3 people be married?
At a certain point people may even start questioning the "age of
majority/consent" that is an arbitrary number that is not even uniform
among the states.




Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

Oh, so you think DOMA should supersede state law in Connecticut, DC,
Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York,
Vermont, and Washington?

That passed our congress by a wide margin .
85 to 14 in the Senate, 342 to 67 in the house.
It was signed by your hero

Do you really want that to be our national code?

Fortunately the SCOTUS may strike down DOMA precisely because it does
violate the concept of states rights.

I don't think the government, any government, should be granting or
taking away so called human rights. We all should have the same,
complete rights, including the right to marry whomever we please.

I agree but the same thing happened with interracial marriages. Some
states allowed it some didn't. Eventually, that changed. Change should
be slow if possible.

So we should go slow on gay marriage? I am trying to understand where
you are going with this.

I think that's the way things work at least at the SCOTUS way of
thinking.

I imagine polygamy will be next. If we are truly going to embrace the
GBLT community we can't ignore the "B"s
Bisexuals should be able to have one each shouldn't they?

I have no objection, but just because you "imagine" doesn't make it
likely.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:40:26 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Urin Asshole" wrote in message


Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?


Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.

I said that not long after it showed up here. Same key phrases, same old BS. It's just another sock back with a different name, and attempting (poorly) to re-invent itself. A third-rate troll at best.

It's kevin, it's harry, it's plume..... look out behind you...... BOO!

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

Cite, Mr. Insanity? I didn't think so.....

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's
rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion
with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware
until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

---------------------------------------

Where did you hear that Scott? The DHS is *not* buying up "all" the
ammo.
The bulk of the ammo is being bought by private citizens in an
unrealistic belief and panic that the "government" is going to outlaw
it or make it unavailable. It's a bunch of BS.

He's insane, that bull just somehow makes it to his brain. He'll offer
up no evidence, just excuses watch!

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On 3/28/2013 7:48 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

---------------------------------------

Where did you hear that Scott? The DHS is *not* buying up "all" the
ammo.
The bulk of the ammo is being bought by private citizens in an
unrealistic belief and panic that the "government" is going to outlaw
it or make it unavailable. It's a bunch of BS.



Read up Dick... It's just coming out in hearings two days ago. Their
answer first is "we are just saving money by buying 5 years worth of
ammo instead of one year at a time"... The next question was if for just
plinking and practice, why all the expensive hollow point ammo... It
will come out Dick, I just pay a bit more attention to CSpan that most
here... mark my words...

cite?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to
bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.


And plume showed up less than 24 hours after loogie left... And loogie
is kevin, there you go.

And so is Harry. It's kevin, it's harry, it's plume. Hey, maybe they're
all double super secret agents working for the agency that is buying all
of the guns and armored vehicles that you've insanely dreamed up!!!