In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:42 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.

====

Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few
instances of rape and incest.

How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who
falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the
Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of
civilization.


Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more
realistic than your loogieism above...

===

The religious right is doing everything they can to put planned
parenthood out of business.

Wayne, you can't talk sense to Scotty. You know that.

On 3/15/2013 9:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:42 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.

====

Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few
instances of rape and incest.

How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who
falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the
Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of
civilization.


Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more
realistic than your loogieism above...

===

The religious right is doing everything they can to put planned
parenthood out of business.

So, there are no women in the US who can not get birth control because
of the Church... got it.

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:24:07 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.

====

Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few
instances of rape and incest.

How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who
falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the
Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of
civilization.

Morning-after pill or RU-486.

Who said anything about punishing, stoning, or peddling sharia law? Kinda goin' off the deep end
there, Wayne.



Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:47:12 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:42 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.

====

Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few
instances of rape and incest.

How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who
falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the
Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of
civilization.


Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more
realistic than your loogieism above...

===

The religious right is doing everything they can to put planned
parenthood out of business.

I have nothing against Planned Parenthood, as long as they don't kill babies.


Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

On Mar 14, 6:58*pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/14/13 6:06 PM, J Herring wrote:









On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:37:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/14/13 4:21 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:13:57 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/14/13 3:45 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:37:30 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:40 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:11:23 PM UTC-5, jps wrote:

bull**** snipped

My kids are still in the me, me, me stage but they're still not as

selfish as the wingers in rec.boats.

Naturally you are talking about the selfishness of the left-wingers who enjoy pilfering from the pockets of the right and everyone in between.

Naturally you need to remove your finger from your ass. Your prostate
is fine.

These idiots can't stand that a liberal has been successful at
business and still wants to lend support to folks who haven't been as
lucky.

The Republican mantra: I've got mine, **** you.

Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives?

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

I's sure conservative born-agains contribute mightily to their churches,
but most of those bucks ain't going to the poor.

Have you reviewed the budgets of the churches to which you refer? What about conservatives who
aren't 'born-agains' ? Most Christians I know are not 'born-agains'. In fact, I don't believe I know
one in that category.

But, you didn't answer the question. Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable
than conservatives? The question was posed because of the apparent allegation made by jps.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

I don't consider "charity" giving to a church that uses the funds for
edifices or salaries of its clergy, or for proselytizing. Charity
supposedly is to help the poor with food, shelter, medical care,
clothing, et cetera. So, when you deduct conservative christian
charitable giving that isn't used to provide direct assistance to the
poor, the amount of giving goes way, way down.

Giving money to one's church so it can send "missionaries" to Central
and South America to convert Catholics into Protestants isn't charitable
giving. Neither is giving money to convert "pagans" into Christians.
It's proselytizing and, as such, money used for those purposes shouldn't
be considered charity or eligible for charitable deduction.

And the question remains unanswered.

Never mind.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

No, I don't believe conservatives are more prone to give to legitimate
charities whose sole purpose is to help the poor or the sick or the
homeless.

Well, I believe you're wrong, but that's OK.

On 3/15/2013 10:05 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:47:12 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:42 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.

====

Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few
instances of rape and incest.

How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who
falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the
Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of
civilization.


Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more
realistic than your loogieism above...

===

The religious right is doing everything they can to put planned
parenthood out of business.

I have nothing against Planned Parenthood, as long as they don't kill babies.


Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!


I would be happy if they would allow alternative viewpoints within the
walls there.. but freedom of speech and taxation with representation is
only for the left...

On 3/15/2013 10:12 AM, John H wrote:
On Mar 14, 6:58 pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/14/13 6:06 PM, J Herring wrote:









On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:37:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/14/13 4:21 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:13:57 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/14/13 3:45 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:37:30 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:40 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:11:23 PM UTC-5, jps wrote:

bull**** snipped

My kids are still in the me, me, me stage but they're still not as

selfish as the wingers in rec.boats.

Naturally you are talking about the selfishness of the left-wingers who enjoy pilfering from the pockets of the right and everyone in between.

Naturally you need to remove your finger from your ass. Your prostate
is fine.

These idiots can't stand that a liberal has been successful at
business and still wants to lend support to folks who haven't been as
lucky.

The Republican mantra: I've got mine, **** you.

Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives?

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

I's sure conservative born-agains contribute mightily to their churches,
but most of those bucks ain't going to the poor.

Have you reviewed the budgets of the churches to which you refer? What about conservatives who
aren't 'born-agains' ? Most Christians I know are not 'born-agains'. In fact, I don't believe I know
one in that category.

But, you didn't answer the question. Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable
than conservatives? The question was posed because of the apparent allegation made by jps.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

I don't consider "charity" giving to a church that uses the funds for
edifices or salaries of its clergy, or for proselytizing. Charity
supposedly is to help the poor with food, shelter, medical care,
clothing, et cetera. So, when you deduct conservative christian
charitable giving that isn't used to provide direct assistance to the
poor, the amount of giving goes way, way down.

Giving money to one's church so it can send "missionaries" to Central
and South America to convert Catholics into Protestants isn't charitable
giving. Neither is giving money to convert "pagans" into Christians.
It's proselytizing and, as such, money used for those purposes shouldn't
be considered charity or eligible for charitable deduction.

And the question remains unanswered.

Never mind.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

No, I don't believe conservatives are more prone to give to legitimate
charities whose sole purpose is to help the poor or the sick or the
homeless.

Well, I believe you're wrong, but that's OK.


There have been studies.. The difference is huge...

In article ,
says...

On 3/15/2013 10:05 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:47:12 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:42 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.

====

Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few
instances of rape and incest.

How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who
falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the
Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of
civilization.


Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more
realistic than your loogieism above...

===

The religious right is doing everything they can to put planned
parenthood out of business.

I have nothing against Planned Parenthood, as long as they don't kill babies.


Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!


I would be happy if they would allow alternative viewpoints within the
walls there.. but freedom of speech and taxation with representation is
only for the left...

Idiot. That is so stupid on so many levels I don't know where to begin.
Except that you are VERY narrow minded, bigoted, and uninformed.

In article ,
says...

On 3/15/2013 10:12 AM, John H wrote:
On Mar 14, 6:58 pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/14/13 6:06 PM, J Herring wrote:









On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:37:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/14/13 4:21 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:13:57 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/14/13 3:45 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:37:30 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:40 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:11:23 PM UTC-5, jps wrote:

bull**** snipped

My kids are still in the me, me, me stage but they're still not as

selfish as the wingers in rec.boats.

Naturally you are talking about the selfishness of the left-wingers who enjoy pilfering from the pockets of the right and everyone in between.

Naturally you need to remove your finger from your ass. Your prostate
is fine.

These idiots can't stand that a liberal has been successful at
business and still wants to lend support to folks who haven't been as
lucky.

The Republican mantra: I've got mine, **** you.

Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives?

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

I's sure conservative born-agains contribute mightily to their churches,
but most of those bucks ain't going to the poor.

Have you reviewed the budgets of the churches to which you refer? What about conservatives who
aren't 'born-agains' ? Most Christians I know are not 'born-agains'. In fact, I don't believe I know
one in that category.

But, you didn't answer the question. Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable
than conservatives? The question was posed because of the apparent allegation made by jps.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

I don't consider "charity" giving to a church that uses the funds for
edifices or salaries of its clergy, or for proselytizing. Charity
supposedly is to help the poor with food, shelter, medical care,
clothing, et cetera. So, when you deduct conservative christian
charitable giving that isn't used to provide direct assistance to the
poor, the amount of giving goes way, way down.

Giving money to one's church so it can send "missionaries" to Central
and South America to convert Catholics into Protestants isn't charitable
giving. Neither is giving money to convert "pagans" into Christians.
It's proselytizing and, as such, money used for those purposes shouldn't
be considered charity or eligible for charitable deduction.

And the question remains unanswered.

Never mind.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

No, I don't believe conservatives are more prone to give to legitimate
charities whose sole purpose is to help the poor or the sick or the
homeless.

Well, I believe you're wrong, but that's OK.


There have been studies.. The difference is huge...

Well, please do show us those "studies" then!!!!

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:59:48 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
.. .

Women barely have the right. It's being eroded every day. Of course, a
****forbrains like you don't actually know that because you watch fake
news. I mean fox news.

-------------------------------

You forgot three or four "****s".


I was having a good day.