On 3/9/2013 12:35 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/9/13 12:24 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/9/2013 12:19 PM, thumper wrote:


Some think gods are simply non-existent. Do you respect all
supernatural beliefs? Islam? Scientology?

I do.. it was one of the things my dad pushed so hard. It's my opinion
that if you are living your life in respect to your God, I can respect
that cause really, we are all looking at the same entity, we just call
him by different names...

On 3/8/2013 10:12 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:57:10 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:11:14 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


There is a website that lists some 3000 known Gods that people have or
do worship. What makes you sure that your's is the real one?

http://tinyurl.com/aqsgu4l

A truly spiritual man respects them all.

Respecting the beliefs of others doesn't require spirituality as much as common courtesy, unless the
belief impinges on one's life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness.

The mockery in this group is totally uncalled for. However, I suppose it's the liberal's idea of
'righteousness'.

There is no good reason whatsoever to respect any and all crazy
delusional beliefs.

It is the individual that holds those beliefs and their right to hold
them that deserve respect regardless of agreement. I don't understand
why you equivocate and conflate that distinction except perhaps to
create a justification to denigrate others.

Why do you mock 'liberal' ideas?

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:48:48 -0700, thumper wrote:

On 3/8/2013 10:12 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:57:10 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:11:14 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


There is a website that lists some 3000 known Gods that people have or
do worship. What makes you sure that your's is the real one?

http://tinyurl.com/aqsgu4l

A truly spiritual man respects them all.

Respecting the beliefs of others doesn't require spirituality as much as common courtesy, unless the
belief impinges on one's life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness.

The mockery in this group is totally uncalled for. However, I suppose it's the liberal's idea of
'righteousness'.

There is no good reason whatsoever to respect any and all crazy
delusional beliefs.

There is no good reason to be discourteous or mocking of the beliefs of others unless the
belief impinges on one's life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness.

It is the individual that holds those beliefs and their right to hold
them that deserve respect regardless of agreement.

Yeah. That's what I meant. Obviously you can't respect a 'belief' unless you know what it is based
upon what the individual has said. Common courtesy should prevail regardless of belief.

I don't understand
why you equivocate and conflate that distinction except perhaps to
create a justification to denigrate others.

What distinction am I equivocating and conflating? If my comment on the mockery being performed by
the liberals in this group bothers you, then I suggest you cry a river, build a bridge, and get over
it.


Why do you mock 'liberal' ideas?

Show me a 'liberal idea' I've mocked, and I'll explain.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:48:48 -0700, thumper wrote:

On 3/8/2013 10:12 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:57:10 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:11:14 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


There is a website that lists some 3000 known Gods that people have or
do worship. What makes you sure that your's is the real one?

http://tinyurl.com/aqsgu4l

A truly spiritual man respects them all.

Respecting the beliefs of others doesn't require spirituality as much as common courtesy, unless the
belief impinges on one's life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness.

The mockery in this group is totally uncalled for. However, I suppose it's the liberal's idea of
'righteousness'.

There is no good reason whatsoever to respect any and all crazy
delusional beliefs.

There is no good reason to be discourteous or mocking of the beliefs of others unless the
belief impinges on one's life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness.

It is the individual that holds those beliefs and their right to hold
them that deserve respect regardless of agreement.

Yeah. That's what I meant. Obviously you can't respect a 'belief' unless you know what it is based
upon what the individual has said. Common courtesy should prevail regardless of belief.

I don't understand
why you equivocate and conflate that distinction except perhaps to
create a justification to denigrate others.

What distinction am I equivocating and conflating? If my comment on the mockery being performed by
the liberals in this group bothers you, then I suggest you cry a river, build a bridge, and get over
it.


Why do you mock 'liberal' ideas?

Show me a 'liberal idea' I've mocked, and I'll explain.


Salmonbait

Do you mean like your idiotic, untrue, stupid assessment of Muslims?