LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default The hypocritical right wingers, or how to be narrow minded

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:00:08 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:54:24 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


Well, stupid, it was me who posted this, not JPS. Also, stupid, this is
about NELSON, GA, not Kennesaw, and Kennesaw is in the COUNTY that I
mentioned as previously enacting this law. BUT, none of this answers my
question as to WHY the right seems to think it's okay for them to
dictate whether or not I have a gun in my house, but they claim to want
less government intrusion in their lives..... purely hypocritical.

OK I was not willing to wait for you to try to find it (it wasn't the
top hit on Google so you didn't really have a chance)

The law includes this language

" Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households
who ... conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of
beliefs or religious doctrine"

I assume you would have a "belief" that would keep you from wanting to
own a gun so you are exempt.
Like I said, you don't have to if you don't want to.
It should also be noted that there is no penalty for breaking this
law.

http://www.nelsongeorgia.com/family-...tion-ordinance

That does NOT negate from the fact that it is a LAW, and as such is
enforceable. It also does not negate from the fact that the right wing
acts as if they want less laws but make more laws when it suits THEM. It
also does not negate from the fact that the new law is in NELSON, GA,
not Kennesaw and is a different law that does not contain the same
verbage as each other. There IS a penalty for breaking this law, and it
is the same as other city penalties. Also, there are other laws on the
books in other states that have similar laws.



What part of "EXEMPT" do you not understand?
... and this is very similar to the law in Kennesaw if not word for
word.

What penalty? Cite that. If it is not in the text of the legislation,
it is not there. It will either say the class of violation it is or it
will list specific penalties., Neither are there.


It's clearly there, $100.00 fine. But, once AGAIN, you are not answering
the question, why is it okay for the right wing to make up laws and ask
them to be enforced when they cry about wanting LESS government
intrusion while they are making MORE government intrusion?
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A good case against being narrow minded. iBoaterer[_2_] General 2 December 27th 12 05:57 AM
New Narrow boat Maffi General 2 March 9th 06 08:11 PM
Weak Minded Dems Skipper General 44 December 17th 05 08:46 PM
Somple-Minded Beliefs Harry Krause General 20 July 23rd 04 04:09 AM
OT here go the narrow minded Republcans....again. basskisser General 20 May 7th 04 01:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017