Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:25:59 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:33:52 -0500, J Herring wrote: Nah, it couldn't happen, but it did: http://tinyurl.com/b98va2x ==== They haven't totally flipped out since they ended the article by advocating for a carbon tax. I do agree with their premise however that environmentalists are fighting the wrong battles. All too often they go after soft targets that have no political backing as opposed to going after the serious offenders. Huh? The Keystone doesn't have political backing??? What the ****?? How would you like to live next to a toxic spill? Serious offenders? Like big oil drilling without safety protocols in place in the Gulf? Or, the meat industry pushing burgers that are bigger than basket balls down the throats of people? How about the bull**** of "clean" coal promoted by one of the filthiest industries of all time? Give me a ****ing break. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Someone at the Washington Post is getting.. | General | |||
Environmentalists vs. boatyards. Part II. Environmentalists fire back! | General | |||
Washington Post gets it! | General | |||
the Washington Post at it again | ASA | |||
They (Washington Post) printed it! OT | General |