In article ,
says...

On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:25:59 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:33:52 -0500, J Herring
wrote:

Nah, it couldn't happen, but it did:

http://tinyurl.com/b98va2x

====

They haven't totally flipped out since they ended the article by
advocating for a carbon tax. I do agree with their premise however
that environmentalists are fighting the wrong battles. All too often
they go after soft targets that have no political backing as opposed
to going after the serious offenders.

I'm surprised that the Post even published such a story, and this time it wasn't just one
individual. Washington Post seems to be waking up.

This is something new also:

http://thewashingtonpost.newspaperdi...er/viewer.aspx

But, now one won't even get a doggie bag.

Gee, of COURSE if something doesn't 100% agree with the party line, you
narrow minded lemmings won't have an open mind about it.