Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() MOBILE, Ala. -- The first lawsuit was filed Friday by one of thousands of passengers trapped aboard a Carnival cruise ship adrift in the Gulf of Mexico for the past five days. After disembarking in Mobile early Friday, Cassie Terry, 25, of Lake Jackson, Texas, hired attorneys Wayne Collins and Brent Allison in the Houston area, who filed the lawsuit in federal court in Miami. The suit charges Carnival with failing to provide a seaworthy ship and sanitary conditions, describing the ship as "a floating toilet, a floating petri dish, a floating hell." Vance Gulliksen, a Carnival spokesman, said officials had not seen a copy of the lawsuit late Friday and could not comment about it. Terry could not be reached for comment. Terry also claims in the lawsuit to have suffered physical and emotional harm during the cruise, including anxiety, nervousness and the loss of the enjoyment of life. "Plaintiff was forced to endure unbearable and horrendous odors on the filthy and disabled vessel, and wade through human feces in order to reach food lines where the wait was counted in hours, only to receive rations of spoiled food," says the lawsuit, which Allison provided to the Los Angeles Times. The lawsuit also claims that during the "horrifying and excruciating tow back to the United States," the ship listed several times, "causing human waste to spill out of non-functioning toilets, flood across the vessel's floors and halls, and drip down the vessel's walls." Terry planned to seek legal advice before she even got off the ship, Allison said. After she reached shore, she called her husband and he contacted the attorneys, Allison said. Allison said Terry was thankful to be home but felt sick and planned to see a doctor. The Carnival Triumph had left Galveston, Texas, a week ago Thursday for a four-day Mexican cruise, but it became stranded in the gulf after an engine fire Sunday. Investigators on Friday were still trying to determine what caused the fire. *Allison said he specializes in maritime law. His firm represented relatives of one of the victims of the deadly wreck off Italy last year of the Costa Concordia, a cruise ship operated by a subsidiary of Carnival. That case was eventually transferred to Florida, he said.* Allison said he was hearing from other Triumph passengers Friday who had heard of his work with the Costa Concordia and were exploring possible lawsuits. http://tinyurl.com/cfb6k7k Blech! -- I'm a *Liberal* because I knew the militant christian fundamentalist racist militaristic xenophobic corporate oligarchy wasn't going to work for me. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/16/13 1:19 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:28:38 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: MOBILE, Ala. -- The first lawsuit was filed Friday by one of thousands of passengers trapped aboard a Carnival cruise ship adrift in the Gulf of Mexico for the past five days. This will be a case to watch. They will have to prove some kind of gross negligence to get around the somewhat iron clad waivers you sign when you buy a ticket. This is the country to do it tho. The US may be the only place in the world where having a signed waiver is no guarantee that you can be sued for exactly what the plaintiff waived. I'll also bet that those that were told, here, we're going to give you a refund, and a voucher for a future cruise, and reimburse you for your expenses, just sign here, are unknowingly signing away their rights to sue. It won't take much of a tort lawyer to bust through that nonsense. -- I'm a *Liberal* because I knew the militant christian fundamentalist racist militaristic xenophobic corporate oligarchy wasn't going to work for me. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/16/2013 2:13 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/16/13 1:19 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:28:38 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: MOBILE, Ala. -- The first lawsuit was filed Friday by one of thousands of passengers trapped aboard a Carnival cruise ship adrift in the Gulf of Mexico for the past five days. This will be a case to watch. They will have to prove some kind of gross negligence to get around the somewhat iron clad waivers you sign when you buy a ticket. This is the country to do it tho. The US may be the only place in the world where having a signed waiver is no guarantee that you can be sued for exactly what the plaintiff waived. I'll also bet that those that were told, here, we're going to give you a refund, and a voucher for a future cruise, and reimburse you for your expenses, just sign here, are unknowingly signing away their rights to sue. It won't take much of a tort lawyer to bust through that nonsense. Ahhh, but it will. Carnival will have the best MARITIME legal defense team, at their service. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/16/13 4:26 PM, Gogarty wrote:
In article om, says... On 2/16/2013 2:13 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/16/13 1:19 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:28:38 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: MOBILE, Ala. -- The first lawsuit was filed Friday by one of thousands of passengers trapped aboard a Carnival cruise ship adrift in the Gulf of Mexico for the past five days. This will be a case to watch. They will have to prove some kind of gross negligence to get around the somewhat iron clad waivers you sign when you buy a ticket. This is the country to do it tho. The US may be the only place in the world where having a signed waiver is no guarantee that you can be sued for exactly what the plaintiff waived. I'll also bet that those that were told, here, we're going to give you a refund, and a voucher for a future cruise, and reimburse you for your expenses, just sign here, are unknowingly signing away their rights to sue. It won't take much of a tort lawyer to bust through that nonsense. Ahhh, but it will. Carnival will have the best MARITIME legal defense team, at their service. MARITIME! That's the word, that's the word. Maritime or admiralty law is a whole different kettle of fish from ordinary tort law. They actually don't need all those signed waivers. Once you set foot on their ship you surrender your tort rights. It's their ball game. Uh-huh. So, admiralty law precludes findings of negligence, eh? ![]() -- I'm a *Liberal* because I knew the militant christian fundamentalist racist militaristic xenophobic corporate oligarchy wasn't going to work for me. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... In article , says... MARITIME! That's the word, that's the word. Maritime or admiralty law is a whole different kettle of fish from ordinary tort law. They actually don't need all those signed waivers. Once you set foot on their ship you surrender your tort rights. It's their ball game. Uh-huh. So, admiralty law precludes findings of negligence, eh? ![]() I did not say that. What it may well do is limit liability. There is precedence here. Another ship in the Pacific had a fire and drifted for five days. How did those cases turn out? Also, Concordia, suits filed, ships arrested then released. Harry should take a look at what maritime law is doing for the victims of the Costa Concordia. http://www.cruiselawnews.com/tags/costa-concordia/ |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/17/2013 1:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:56:50 -0500, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... MARITIME! That's the word, that's the word. Maritime or admiralty law is a whole different kettle of fish from ordinary tort law. They actually don't need all those signed waivers. Once you set foot on their ship you surrender your tort rights. It's their ball game. Uh-huh. So, admiralty law precludes findings of negligence, eh? ![]() I did not say that. What it may well do is limit liability. There is precedence here. Another ship in the Pacific had a fire and drifted for five days. How did those cases turn out? Also, Concordia, suits filed, ships arrested then released. This is America. The lawyers may not be able to do anything about the ship and crew but they will the Carnival front office. That is a land based US business and they will say it was negligent corporate decisions that were responsible for the accident and the problems in the cleanup. Whether they get away with it is anyone's guess but what do the lawyers have to lose? Only their time. In most of those other countries, loser pays. That cuts down on frivolous suits a bit This incident will only serve to make future potential cruise ship passengers more aware that they have very few, if any, rights aboard cruise ships. When **** happens, there is not a whole lot you can do about it. Carnival is probably more worried about bad publicity than compensating their passengers. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2697774.html |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Man that's gotta stink! | General | |||
Congress gives Y K W the stink finger | General | |||
how to overcome toilet line stink? | Cruising | |||
how to overcome toilet line stink? | General | |||
how to overcome toilet line stink? | Boat Building |