On 2/17/2013 2:23 AM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:41:29 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:49:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/16/13 5:14 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:11:48 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:58:42 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Want to know where over 90% of these illegal guns originate?

The "ring of fire" companies in California?

Stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from legal owners.

It does sort of blow the hell out of that "gun show loophole" thing
tho.

No, it doesn't.

90% of the illegal guns are stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from
legal owners and you think gun shows are a major problem?
Explain

You sell a ****ing car, you have to document the hell out of it. But a
gun, no. What the ****? How many people kill 50 people with a car?

Believe the gun manufactures if you want, but they don't give a ****
about the 2nd Amend. They give a **** about making money.


Kind of like you hiding assets to keep from paying the folks who worked
or provided you goods and services over the years, so you can "make more
money"? Same thing asshole, only the gun manufacturers are working
for their money, not taking it and running with it like you harry krause

In article ,
says...

On 2/16/13 7:24 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:


yeah, they want that too though. Compromise is not an option for
democrats, only hate and intolerance...

Funny stuff.

Ask the stupid little toad who said "I reject the word
compromise".......

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:41:29 -0500, wrote:


90% of the illegal guns are stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from
legal owners and you think gun shows are a major problem?
Explain

You sell a ****ing car, you have to document the hell out of it. But a
gun, no. What the ****? How many people kill 50 people with a car?

Believe the gun manufactures if you want, but they don't give a ****
about the 2nd Amend. They give a **** about making money.

You'll get nowhere with him. He's a gun nut. Besides, his 90% figure
is pulled from his ass. No truth in it at all. He'll dance as much as
it takes to make sure criminals have easy access to guns.
All because he doesn't want guns traceable like cars are.
Thinks the gov will send commandos dropping from black helicopters to
take his guns away. Kinda like a Waco scenario.
Real common right-winger thought process. That's the heart of it.

That 90% came from ME, and I'm FAR from a "gun nut".

In article ,
says...

On 2/17/2013 2:23 AM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:41:29 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:49:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/16/13 5:14 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:11:48 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:58:42 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Want to know where over 90% of these illegal guns originate?

The "ring of fire" companies in California?

Stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from legal owners.

It does sort of blow the hell out of that "gun show loophole" thing
tho.

No, it doesn't.

90% of the illegal guns are stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from
legal owners and you think gun shows are a major problem?
Explain

You sell a ****ing car, you have to document the hell out of it. But a
gun, no. What the ****? How many people kill 50 people with a car?

Believe the gun manufactures if you want, but they don't give a ****
about the 2nd Amend. They give a **** about making money.


Kind of like you hiding assets to keep from paying the folks who worked
or provided you goods and services over the years, so you can "make more
money"? Same thing asshole, only the gun manufacturers are working
for their money, not taking it and running with it like you harry krause

Is that anything like your hospital bill and taxes that you owe? How's
that blackmail thing against Harry going for you?

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:41:29 -0500, wrote:


90% of the illegal guns are stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from
legal owners and you think gun shows are a major problem?
Explain

You sell a ****ing car, you have to document the hell out of it. But a
gun, no. What the ****? How many people kill 50 people with a car?

Believe the gun manufactures if you want, but they don't give a ****
about the 2nd Amend. They give a **** about making money.

You'll get nowhere with him. He's a gun nut. Besides, his 90% figure
is pulled from his ass. No truth in it at all. He'll dance as much as
it takes to make sure criminals have easy access to guns.
All because he doesn't want guns traceable like cars are.
Thinks the gov will send commandos dropping from black helicopters to
take his guns away. Kinda like a Waco scenario.
Real common right-winger thought process. That's the heart of it.

Why is exercising one of your rights dependent upon a background check?

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:41:29 -0500, wrote:


90% of the illegal guns are stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from
legal owners and you think gun shows are a major problem?
Explain

You sell a ****ing car, you have to document the hell out of it. But a
gun, no. What the ****? How many people kill 50 people with a car?

Believe the gun manufactures if you want, but they don't give a ****
about the 2nd Amend. They give a **** about making money.

You'll get nowhere with him. He's a gun nut. Besides, his 90% figure
is pulled from his ass. No truth in it at all. He'll dance as much as
it takes to make sure criminals have easy access to guns.
All because he doesn't want guns traceable like cars are.
Thinks the gov will send commandos dropping from black helicopters to
take his guns away. Kinda like a Waco scenario.
Real common right-winger thought process. That's the heart of it.

Why is exercising one of your rights dependent upon a background check?

Well then, we should let felons, the insane, and even prisoners have
guns, right?

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:23:01 -0800, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:41:29 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:49:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/16/13 5:14 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:11:48 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:58:42 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Want to know where over 90% of these illegal guns originate?

The "ring of fire" companies in California?

Stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from legal owners.

It does sort of blow the hell out of that "gun show loophole" thing
tho.

No, it doesn't.

90% of the illegal guns are stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from
legal owners and you think gun shows are a major problem?
Explain

You sell a ****ing car, you have to document the hell out of it. But a
gun, no. What the ****? How many people kill 50 people with a car?

Believe the gun manufactures if you want, but they don't give a ****
about the 2nd Amend. They give a **** about making money.

I like your thinking and writing, good use of language. My kinda
style.

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:41:29 -0500, wrote:


90% of the illegal guns are stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from
legal owners and you think gun shows are a major problem?
Explain

You sell a ****ing car, you have to document the hell out of it. But a
gun, no. What the ****? How many people kill 50 people with a car?

Believe the gun manufactures if you want, but they don't give a ****
about the 2nd Amend. They give a **** about making money.

You'll get nowhere with him. He's a gun nut. Besides, his 90% figure
is pulled from his ass. No truth in it at all. He'll dance as much as
it takes to make sure criminals have easy access to guns.
All because he doesn't want guns traceable like cars are.
Thinks the gov will send commandos dropping from black helicopters to
take his guns away. Kinda like a Waco scenario.
Real common right-winger thought process. That's the heart of it.

That 90% came from ME, and I'm FAR from a "gun nut".


------------

What is a ban on greater than 10 round magazines, and "Assault" rifles going
to do? There were about 6500 gun deaths over the last year. Less than 400
from long guns, and maybe 1/2 of those from the quote Assault looking rifle.
Probably none from a real assault rifle. Eliminate the thug on thug
shootings, and the death rate and wounding would fall precipitously! What
we have to address is not guns, but a break down in morals and society.
What the hell, some NBA player has 22 kids by 19 different women, and he is
not condoned? Sad commentary on modern society. Hugh Grant is so proud of
his newborn child. Not proud enough to formalize the relationship with the
mom.

wrote in message ...

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:11:26 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


Well then, we should let felons, the insane, and even prisoners have
guns, right?

How will laws keep a thief from selling a gun without a background
check. You say 90% of crime guns are stolen.

("borrowed" is a red herring)


----------------------

In the wild west, which had less murders per capita than NYC, they gave back
the prisoners guns when he left prison. He had fulfilled his debt to
society. Just outlaw criminal behavior, will do as much as any other law
they are proposing at the present time gun crime.

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:57:38 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:41:29 -0500, wrote:


90% of the illegal guns are stolen, borrowed or otherwise taken from
legal owners and you think gun shows are a major problem?
Explain

You sell a ****ing car, you have to document the hell out of it. But a
gun, no. What the ****? How many people kill 50 people with a car?

Believe the gun manufactures if you want, but they don't give a ****
about the 2nd Amend. They give a **** about making money.

You'll get nowhere with him. He's a gun nut. Besides, his 90% figure
is pulled from his ass. No truth in it at all. He'll dance as much as
it takes to make sure criminals have easy access to guns.
All because he doesn't want guns traceable like cars are.
Thinks the gov will send commandos dropping from black helicopters to
take his guns away. Kinda like a Waco scenario.
Real common right-winger thought process. That's the heart of it.

That 90% came from ME, and I'm FAR from a "gun nut".


------------

What is a ban on greater than 10 round magazines, and "Assault" rifles going
to do? There were about 6500 gun deaths over the last year. Less than 400
from long guns, and maybe 1/2 of those from the quote Assault looking rifle.
Probably none from a real assault rifle. Eliminate the thug on thug
shootings, and the death rate and wounding would fall precipitously! What
we have to address is not guns, but a break down in morals and society.
What the hell, some NBA player has 22 kids by 19 different women, and he is
not condoned? Sad commentary on modern society. Hugh Grant is so proud of
his newborn child. Not proud enough to formalize the relationship with the
mom.

Amen.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

You know you live in a Country run by idiots if...
....the death penalty is a 'no-no', but death by Hellfire
*without* a trial is AOK!