On 2/4/2013 12:10 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 11:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:04 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....

If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect
them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than
simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line.

This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on
speeding.

... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying
weapons in the first place."

Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can
buy car insurance?


It's all about the slippery slope to dems, all a compromise means is we
are gonna' reload and come for the rest...

Insurance? No habla engles senor.