I don't get enough abuse here, so...

I'm not a fan of tattoos on women. I think women physically are
decorative enough. Sometimes, though, I'll see a tattoo on a woman in an
advertisement or in a movie, and it doesn't bother me at all, because
those tattoos, whether for real or for show, typically are well-done by
artists, well-drawn, well-inked, and not covering a substantial portion
of female real estate.

But the tattoos I see on women in real life? Goodness. Enormous, badly
drawn, badly inked. Saw a woman at the supermarket today who was wearing
a scoop neck sweatshirt and who obviously had most of her frontage
tattooed so a lot of it would be on view. I swear, from what I could see
of it (and I was actually looking away, it was so bad), it looked like
the backside of the alien Sigourney Weaver encountered. In the summer
around here, I see tattoos on women that no self-respecting sailor would
get on a port call in the Philippines. "Tramp stamps" especially I find
offensive, especially on a woman who is 200 pounds overweight.

So, what is with these women and their big, ugly, poorly drawn,
amateurishly inked tattoos?

Fire away.

ESAD wrote:
I don't get enough abuse here, so...

I'm not a fan of tattoos on women. I think women physically are
decorative enough. Sometimes, though, I'll see a tattoo on a woman in
an advertisement or in a movie, and it doesn't bother me at all,
because those tattoos, whether for real or for show, typically are
well-done by artists, well-drawn, well-inked, and not covering a
substantial portion of female real estate.

But the tattoos I see on women in real life? Goodness. Enormous, badly
drawn, badly inked. Saw a woman at the supermarket today who was
wearing a scoop neck sweatshirt and who obviously had most of her
frontage tattooed so a lot of it would be on view. I swear, from what
I could see of it (and I was actually looking away, it was so bad), it
looked like the backside of the alien Sigourney Weaver encountered. In
the summer around here, I see tattoos on women that no self-respecting
sailor would get on a port call in the Philippines. "Tramp stamps"
especially I find offensive, especially on a woman who is 200 pounds
overweight.

So, what is with these women and their big, ugly, poorly drawn,
amateurishly inked tattoos?

Fire away.

You wife is clearly overweight, tax cheat. It's no wonder why you have
this strange infatuation with Sarah Palin.

On Jan 26, 8:29*pm, Earl wrote:
ESAD wrote:
I don't get enough abuse here, so...

I'm not a fan of tattoos on women. I think women physically are
decorative enough. Sometimes, though, I'll see a tattoo on a woman in
an advertisement or in a movie, and it doesn't bother me at all,
because those tattoos, whether for real or for show, typically are
well-done by artists, well-drawn, well-inked, and not covering a
substantial portion of female real estate.

But the tattoos I see on women in real life? Goodness. Enormous, badly
drawn, badly inked. Saw a woman at the supermarket today who was
wearing a scoop neck sweatshirt and who obviously had most of her
frontage tattooed so a lot of it would be on view. I swear, from what
I could see of it (and I was actually looking away, it was so bad), it
looked like the backside of the alien Sigourney Weaver encountered. In
the summer around here, I see tattoos on women that no self-respecting
sailor would get on a port call in the Philippines. "Tramp stamps"
especially I find offensive, especially on a woman who is 200 pounds
overweight.

So, what is with these women and their big, ugly, poorly drawn,
amateurishly inked tattoos?

Fire away.

You wife is clearly overweight, tax cheat. *It's no wonder why you have
this strange infatuation with Sarah Palin.

Harrys tattoo would be an asshole....right on his forehead.

In article ,
says...

I don't get enough abuse here, so...

I'm not a fan of tattoos on women. I think women physically are
decorative enough. Sometimes, though, I'll see a tattoo on a woman in an
advertisement or in a movie, and it doesn't bother me at all, because
those tattoos, whether for real or for show, typically are well-done by
artists, well-drawn, well-inked, and not covering a substantial portion
of female real estate.

But the tattoos I see on women in real life? Goodness. Enormous, badly
drawn, badly inked. Saw a woman at the supermarket today who was wearing
a scoop neck sweatshirt and who obviously had most of her frontage
tattooed so a lot of it would be on view. I swear, from what I could see
of it (and I was actually looking away, it was so bad), it looked like
the backside of the alien Sigourney Weaver encountered. In the summer
around here, I see tattoos on women that no self-respecting sailor would
get on a port call in the Philippines. "Tramp stamps" especially I find
offensive, especially on a woman who is 200 pounds overweight.

So, what is with these women and their big, ugly, poorly drawn,
amateurishly inked tattoos?

Fire away.

http://tinyurl.com/b646cme

On 1/27/13 12:53 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:10:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:

I don't get enough abuse here, so...

I'm not a fan of tattoos on women.

I liked the days when women had pony tails and sailors had tattoos.


Bygone days...