ESAD wrote:
I don't get enough abuse here, so...

I'm not a fan of tattoos on women. I think women physically are
decorative enough. Sometimes, though, I'll see a tattoo on a woman in
an advertisement or in a movie, and it doesn't bother me at all,
because those tattoos, whether for real or for show, typically are
well-done by artists, well-drawn, well-inked, and not covering a
substantial portion of female real estate.

But the tattoos I see on women in real life? Goodness. Enormous, badly
drawn, badly inked. Saw a woman at the supermarket today who was
wearing a scoop neck sweatshirt and who obviously had most of her
frontage tattooed so a lot of it would be on view. I swear, from what
I could see of it (and I was actually looking away, it was so bad), it
looked like the backside of the alien Sigourney Weaver encountered. In
the summer around here, I see tattoos on women that no self-respecting
sailor would get on a port call in the Philippines. "Tramp stamps"
especially I find offensive, especially on a woman who is 200 pounds
overweight.

So, what is with these women and their big, ugly, poorly drawn,
amateurishly inked tattoos?

Fire away.

You wife is clearly overweight, tax cheat. It's no wonder why you have
this strange infatuation with Sarah Palin.