On Jan 26, 8:29*pm, Earl wrote:
ESAD wrote:
I don't get enough abuse here, so...

I'm not a fan of tattoos on women. I think women physically are
decorative enough. Sometimes, though, I'll see a tattoo on a woman in
an advertisement or in a movie, and it doesn't bother me at all,
because those tattoos, whether for real or for show, typically are
well-done by artists, well-drawn, well-inked, and not covering a
substantial portion of female real estate.

But the tattoos I see on women in real life? Goodness. Enormous, badly
drawn, badly inked. Saw a woman at the supermarket today who was
wearing a scoop neck sweatshirt and who obviously had most of her
frontage tattooed so a lot of it would be on view. I swear, from what
I could see of it (and I was actually looking away, it was so bad), it
looked like the backside of the alien Sigourney Weaver encountered. In
the summer around here, I see tattoos on women that no self-respecting
sailor would get on a port call in the Philippines. "Tramp stamps"
especially I find offensive, especially on a woman who is 200 pounds
overweight.

So, what is with these women and their big, ugly, poorly drawn,
amateurishly inked tattoos?

Fire away.

You wife is clearly overweight, tax cheat. *It's no wonder why you have
this strange infatuation with Sarah Palin.

Harrys tattoo would be an asshole....right on his forehead.